From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 3.9-rc1
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:04:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130212230458.GA24673@quad.lixom.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5119FE2A.5040108@atmel.com>
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 09:32:42AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 02/05/2013 11:20 AM, Nicolas Ferre :
> > Arnd, Olof,
> >
> > As I realized reading Linus' email that it was not possible to queue more
> > fixes for 3.8, I took my time to send this tiny pull request. But now that
> > the merge window is approaching, I prefer not to wait for more material.
> > So, here is a "fixes" pull-request embedding a single patch. I have placed this
> > one on top of material that you already have from me in your "fixes" and
> > "for-next" branches.
>
> Olof,
>
> Ping?
>
> As the other AT91 related branches have been pulled in, I suspect this
> little pull-request had been forgotten.
Yeah, due to the hold-off on fixes in general I let this one sit for a bit
while I sorted out what we were going to send to Linus. I've pulled it in now.
Thanks for the reminder.
-Olof
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Robert Nelson <Robert.Nelson@digikey.com>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 3.9-rc1
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:04:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130212230458.GA24673@quad.lixom.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5119FE2A.5040108@atmel.com>
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 09:32:42AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 02/05/2013 11:20 AM, Nicolas Ferre :
> > Arnd, Olof,
> >
> > As I realized reading Linus' email that it was not possible to queue more
> > fixes for 3.8, I took my time to send this tiny pull request. But now that
> > the merge window is approaching, I prefer not to wait for more material.
> > So, here is a "fixes" pull-request embedding a single patch. I have placed this
> > one on top of material that you already have from me in your "fixes" and
> > "for-next" branches.
>
> Olof,
>
> Ping?
>
> As the other AT91 related branches have been pulled in, I suspect this
> little pull-request had been forgotten.
Yeah, due to the hold-off on fixes in general I let this one sit for a bit
while I sorted out what we were going to send to Linus. I've pulled it in now.
Thanks for the reminder.
-Olof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-12 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-05 10:20 [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 3.9-rc1 Nicolas Ferre
2013-02-05 10:20 ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-02-12 8:32 ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-02-12 8:32 ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-02-12 23:04 ` Olof Johansson [this message]
2013-02-12 23:04 ` Olof Johansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130212230458.GA24673@quad.lixom.net \
--to=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.