From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Simon Jeons <simon.jeons@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@darnok.org>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zsmalloc: Fix TLB coherency and build problem
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:45:16 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130219234516.GB16950@blaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51234EEC.3010700@gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:07:40PM +0800, Simon Jeons wrote:
> On 01/28/2013 09:00 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >Recently, Matt Sealey reported he fail to build zsmalloc caused by
> >using of local_flush_tlb_kernel_range which are architecture dependent
> >function so !CONFIG_SMP in ARM couldn't implement it so it ends up
> >build error following as.
>
> Confuse me!
>
> 1) Why I see flush_tlb_kernel_range is different in different architecture?
IMHO, all architecture can do their best effort by thier own way.
> 2) Does local here means local cpu? If the answer is yes, why ARM
Yes.
> doesn't support it?
ARM supports it for some configuration and CPUs.
The thing is that every architecture doesn't support so it's not a generic API.
It means we should avoid it in general layer.
>
> >
> > MODPOST 216 modules
> > LZMA arch/arm/boot/compressed/piggy.lzma
> > AS arch/arm/boot/compressed/lib1funcs.o
> >ERROR: "v7wbi_flush_kern_tlb_range"
> >[drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc.ko] undefined!
> >make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1
> >make: *** [modules] Error 2
> >make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> >
> >The reason we used that function is copy method by [1]
> >was really slow in ARM but at that time.
> >
> >More severe problem is ARM can prefetch speculatively on other CPUs
> >so under us, other TLBs can have an entry only if we do flush local
> >CPU. Russell King pointed that. Thanks!
> >We don't have many choices except using flush_tlb_kernel_range.
> >
> >My experiment in ARMv7 processor 4 core didn't make any difference with
> >zsmapbench[2] between local_flush_tlb_kernel_range and flush_tlb_kernel_range
> >but still page-table based is much better than copy-based.
> >
> >* bigger is better.
> >
> >1. local_flush_tlb_kernel_range: 3918795 mappings
> >2. flush_tlb_kernel_range : 3989538 mappings
> >3. copy-based: 635158 mappings
> >
> >This patch replace local_flush_tlb_kernel_range with
> >flush_tlb_kernel_range which are avaialbe in all architectures
> >because we already have used it in vmalloc allocator which are
> >generic one so build problem should go away and performane loss
> >shoud be void.
> >
> >[1] f553646, zsmalloc: add page table mapping method
> >[2] https://github.com/spartacus06/zsmapbench
> >
> >Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> >Cc: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>
> >Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
> >Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@darnok.org>
> >Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
> >Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >Reported-by: Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa.com>
> >Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> >---
> >
> >Matt, Could you test this patch?
> >
> > drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c | 10 ++++------
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c b/drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c
> >index eb00772..82e627c 100644
> >--- a/drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c
> >+++ b/drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c
> >@@ -222,11 +222,9 @@ struct zs_pool {
> > /*
> > * By default, zsmalloc uses a copy-based object mapping method to access
> > * allocations that span two pages. However, if a particular architecture
> >- * 1) Implements local_flush_tlb_kernel_range() and 2) Performs VM mapping
> >- * faster than copying, then it should be added here so that
> >- * USE_PGTABLE_MAPPING is defined. This causes zsmalloc to use page table
> >- * mapping rather than copying
> >- * for object mapping.
> >+ * performs VM mapping faster than copying, then it should be added here
> >+ * so that USE_PGTABLE_MAPPING is defined. This causes zsmalloc to use
> >+ * page table mapping rather than copying for object mapping.
> > */
> > #if defined(CONFIG_ARM)
> > #define USE_PGTABLE_MAPPING
> >@@ -663,7 +661,7 @@ static inline void __zs_unmap_object(struct mapping_area *area,
> > flush_cache_vunmap(addr, end);
> > unmap_kernel_range_noflush(addr, PAGE_SIZE * 2);
> >- local_flush_tlb_kernel_range(addr, end);
> >+ flush_tlb_kernel_range(addr, end);
> > }
> > #else /* USE_PGTABLE_MAPPING */
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Simon Jeons <simon.jeons@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@darnok.org>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zsmalloc: Fix TLB coherency and build problem
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:45:16 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130219234516.GB16950@blaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51234EEC.3010700@gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:07:40PM +0800, Simon Jeons wrote:
> On 01/28/2013 09:00 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >Recently, Matt Sealey reported he fail to build zsmalloc caused by
> >using of local_flush_tlb_kernel_range which are architecture dependent
> >function so !CONFIG_SMP in ARM couldn't implement it so it ends up
> >build error following as.
>
> Confuse me!
>
> 1) Why I see flush_tlb_kernel_range is different in different architecture?
IMHO, all architecture can do their best effort by thier own way.
> 2) Does local here means local cpu? If the answer is yes, why ARM
Yes.
> doesn't support it?
ARM supports it for some configuration and CPUs.
The thing is that every architecture doesn't support so it's not a generic API.
It means we should avoid it in general layer.
>
> >
> > MODPOST 216 modules
> > LZMA arch/arm/boot/compressed/piggy.lzma
> > AS arch/arm/boot/compressed/lib1funcs.o
> >ERROR: "v7wbi_flush_kern_tlb_range"
> >[drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc.ko] undefined!
> >make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1
> >make: *** [modules] Error 2
> >make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> >
> >The reason we used that function is copy method by [1]
> >was really slow in ARM but at that time.
> >
> >More severe problem is ARM can prefetch speculatively on other CPUs
> >so under us, other TLBs can have an entry only if we do flush local
> >CPU. Russell King pointed that. Thanks!
> >We don't have many choices except using flush_tlb_kernel_range.
> >
> >My experiment in ARMv7 processor 4 core didn't make any difference with
> >zsmapbench[2] between local_flush_tlb_kernel_range and flush_tlb_kernel_range
> >but still page-table based is much better than copy-based.
> >
> >* bigger is better.
> >
> >1. local_flush_tlb_kernel_range: 3918795 mappings
> >2. flush_tlb_kernel_range : 3989538 mappings
> >3. copy-based: 635158 mappings
> >
> >This patch replace local_flush_tlb_kernel_range with
> >flush_tlb_kernel_range which are avaialbe in all architectures
> >because we already have used it in vmalloc allocator which are
> >generic one so build problem should go away and performane loss
> >shoud be void.
> >
> >[1] f553646, zsmalloc: add page table mapping method
> >[2] https://github.com/spartacus06/zsmapbench
> >
> >Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> >Cc: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>
> >Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
> >Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@darnok.org>
> >Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
> >Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >Reported-by: Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa.com>
> >Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> >---
> >
> >Matt, Could you test this patch?
> >
> > drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c | 10 ++++------
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c b/drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c
> >index eb00772..82e627c 100644
> >--- a/drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c
> >+++ b/drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c
> >@@ -222,11 +222,9 @@ struct zs_pool {
> > /*
> > * By default, zsmalloc uses a copy-based object mapping method to access
> > * allocations that span two pages. However, if a particular architecture
> >- * 1) Implements local_flush_tlb_kernel_range() and 2) Performs VM mapping
> >- * faster than copying, then it should be added here so that
> >- * USE_PGTABLE_MAPPING is defined. This causes zsmalloc to use page table
> >- * mapping rather than copying
> >- * for object mapping.
> >+ * performs VM mapping faster than copying, then it should be added here
> >+ * so that USE_PGTABLE_MAPPING is defined. This causes zsmalloc to use
> >+ * page table mapping rather than copying for object mapping.
> > */
> > #if defined(CONFIG_ARM)
> > #define USE_PGTABLE_MAPPING
> >@@ -663,7 +661,7 @@ static inline void __zs_unmap_object(struct mapping_area *area,
> > flush_cache_vunmap(addr, end);
> > unmap_kernel_range_noflush(addr, PAGE_SIZE * 2);
> >- local_flush_tlb_kernel_range(addr, end);
> >+ flush_tlb_kernel_range(addr, end);
> > }
> > #else /* USE_PGTABLE_MAPPING */
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-19 23:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-28 1:00 [PATCH] zsmalloc: Fix TLB coherency and build problem Minchan Kim
2013-01-28 1:00 ` Minchan Kim
2013-01-30 2:48 ` Minchan Kim
2013-01-30 2:48 ` Minchan Kim
2013-02-01 13:02 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-02-01 13:02 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-02-01 14:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-01 14:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-03 23:50 ` Minchan Kim
2013-02-03 23:50 ` Minchan Kim
2013-02-19 10:07 ` Simon Jeons
2013-02-19 10:07 ` Simon Jeons
2013-02-19 23:45 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2013-02-19 23:45 ` Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130219234516.GB16950@blaptop \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=konrad@darnok.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=matt@genesi-usa.com \
--cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
--cc=simon.jeons@gmail.com \
--cc=sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.