OCFS2 mainline state?

OCFS2 mainline state?

[Richard Weinberger]

Hi!

Today I encountered the following problem on v3.8:
[   28.940032] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
...
[   28.984953] Call Trace:
[   28.986628   [<ffffffffa04cb200>] ocfs2_fast_symlink_readpage+0x70/0x1b0 [ocfs2]
[   28.988302]  [<ffffffff8110dc49>] ? add_to_page_cache_lru+0x29/0x40
[   28.989942]  [<ffffffff8110ddca>] do_read_cache_page+0x7a/0x170
[   28.991573]  [<ffffffff8110def4>] read_cache_page_async+0x14/0x20
[   28.993212]  [<ffffffff8110df09>] read_cache_page+0x9/0x20
[   28.994827]  [<ffffffff81170ae5>] page_getlink.isra.9+0x25/0x80
[   28.996442]  [<ffffffff81170b61>] page_follow_link_light+0x21/0x40
[   28.998049]  [<ffffffff8117090d>] generic_readlink+0x3d/0xa0
[   28.999653]  [<ffffffff8116c0db>] sys_readlinkat+0xfb/0x130
[   29.001246]  [<ffffffff8116c126>] sys_readlink+0x16/0x20
[   29.002839]  [<ffffffff815d8dad>] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f

To my utter astonishment I found out that the issue is known since August 2012.
And there is also a trivial fix for it.[0]
The said fix found it's way into Oracle Unbreakable Linux very quickly,
but not into mainline.[1]

Now I'm wondering how much Oracle really cares about OCFS2 in mainline?
Maybe there are some more unfixed vulnerabilities?

Not amused,
//richard

[0] http://www.mail-archive.com/ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com/msg07774.html
[1] https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/el-errata/2012-October/003103.html

[Ocfs2-devel] OCFS2 mainline state?

[Mark Fasheh]

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 09:33:34PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Today I encountered the following problem on v3.8:
> [   28.940032] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> ...
> [   28.984953] Call Trace:
> [   28.986628   [<ffffffffa04cb200>] ocfs2_fast_symlink_readpage+0x70/0x1b0 [ocfs2]
> [   28.988302]  [<ffffffff8110dc49>] ? add_to_page_cache_lru+0x29/0x40
> [   28.989942]  [<ffffffff8110ddca>] do_read_cache_page+0x7a/0x170
> [   28.991573]  [<ffffffff8110def4>] read_cache_page_async+0x14/0x20
> [   28.993212]  [<ffffffff8110df09>] read_cache_page+0x9/0x20
> [   28.994827]  [<ffffffff81170ae5>] page_getlink.isra.9+0x25/0x80
> [   28.996442]  [<ffffffff81170b61>] page_follow_link_light+0x21/0x40
> [   28.998049]  [<ffffffff8117090d>] generic_readlink+0x3d/0xa0
> [   28.999653]  [<ffffffff8116c0db>] sys_readlinkat+0xfb/0x130
> [   29.001246]  [<ffffffff8116c126>] sys_readlink+0x16/0x20
> [   29.002839]  [<ffffffff815d8dad>] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f

I've seen that patch actually and yes it should have been in mainline
already. I didn't see whether it's in -mm (Andrew is pickup up some of the
patches for us right now).

I'll check and if it's not I'll try to send him a version of it today.
	--Mark

--
Mark Fasheh

Re: OCFS2 mainline state?

[Mark Fasheh]

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 09:33:34PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Today I encountered the following problem on v3.8:
> [   28.940032] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> ...
> [   28.984953] Call Trace:
> [   28.986628   [<ffffffffa04cb200>] ocfs2_fast_symlink_readpage+0x70/0x1b0 [ocfs2]
> [   28.988302]  [<ffffffff8110dc49>] ? add_to_page_cache_lru+0x29/0x40
> [   28.989942]  [<ffffffff8110ddca>] do_read_cache_page+0x7a/0x170
> [   28.991573]  [<ffffffff8110def4>] read_cache_page_async+0x14/0x20
> [   28.993212]  [<ffffffff8110df09>] read_cache_page+0x9/0x20
> [   28.994827]  [<ffffffff81170ae5>] page_getlink.isra.9+0x25/0x80
> [   28.996442]  [<ffffffff81170b61>] page_follow_link_light+0x21/0x40
> [   28.998049]  [<ffffffff8117090d>] generic_readlink+0x3d/0xa0
> [   28.999653]  [<ffffffff8116c0db>] sys_readlinkat+0xfb/0x130
> [   29.001246]  [<ffffffff8116c126>] sys_readlink+0x16/0x20
> [   29.002839]  [<ffffffff815d8dad>] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f

I've seen that patch actually and yes it should have been in mainline
already. I didn't see whether it's in -mm (Andrew is pickup up some of the
patches for us right now).

I'll check and if it's not I'll try to send him a version of it today.
	--Mark

--
Mark Fasheh

[Ocfs2-devel] OCFS2 mainline state?

[Al Viro]

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 01:11:03PM -0800, Mark Fasheh wrote:

> I've seen that patch actually and yes it should have been in mainline
> already. I didn't see whether it's in -mm (Andrew is pickup up some of the
> patches for us right now).
> 
> I'll check and if it's not I'll try to send him a version of it today.

Normally filesystem trees are fed to Linus...  Or I can pick that patch via
VFS tree (and send it to Linus tomorrow).  There also had been Jan's ocfs2
patch a while ago; I picked only the VFS part of that series, ext* and
IIRC xfs ones went to corresponding filesystem trees.  Should I just pick
the ocfs2 stuff from now on?

Re: OCFS2 mainline state?

[Al Viro]

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 01:11:03PM -0800, Mark Fasheh wrote:

> I've seen that patch actually and yes it should have been in mainline
> already. I didn't see whether it's in -mm (Andrew is pickup up some of the
> patches for us right now).
> 
> I'll check and if it's not I'll try to send him a version of it today.

Normally filesystem trees are fed to Linus...  Or I can pick that patch via
VFS tree (and send it to Linus tomorrow).  There also had been Jan's ocfs2
patch a while ago; I picked only the VFS part of that series, ext* and
IIRC xfs ones went to corresponding filesystem trees.  Should I just pick
the ocfs2 stuff from now on?

[Ocfs2-devel] OCFS2 mainline state?

[Mark Fasheh]

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 09:16:18PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 01:11:03PM -0800, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> 
> > I've seen that patch actually and yes it should have been in mainline
> > already. I didn't see whether it's in -mm (Andrew is pickup up some of the
> > patches for us right now).
> > 
> > I'll check and if it's not I'll try to send him a version of it today.
> 
> Normally filesystem trees are fed to Linus...  Or I can pick that patch via
> VFS tree (and send it to Linus tomorrow).  There also had been Jan's ocfs2
> patch a while ago; I picked only the VFS part of that series, ext* and
> IIRC xfs ones went to corresponding filesystem trees.  Should I just pick
> the ocfs2 stuff from now on?

I personally would absolutely be fine (and grateful) with you picking up the
Ocfs2 stuff.
	--Mark

Re: OCFS2 mainline state?

[Mark Fasheh]

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 09:16:18PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 01:11:03PM -0800, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> 
> > I've seen that patch actually and yes it should have been in mainline
> > already. I didn't see whether it's in -mm (Andrew is pickup up some of the
> > patches for us right now).
> > 
> > I'll check and if it's not I'll try to send him a version of it today.
> 
> Normally filesystem trees are fed to Linus...  Or I can pick that patch via
> VFS tree (and send it to Linus tomorrow).  There also had been Jan's ocfs2
> patch a while ago; I picked only the VFS part of that series, ext* and
> IIRC xfs ones went to corresponding filesystem trees.  Should I just pick
> the ocfs2 stuff from now on?

I personally would absolutely be fine (and grateful) with you picking up the
Ocfs2 stuff.
	--Mark

[Ocfs2-devel] OCFS2 mainline state?

[Joel Becker]

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 09:16:18PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 01:11:03PM -0800, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> 
> > I've seen that patch actually and yes it should have been in mainline
> > already. I didn't see whether it's in -mm (Andrew is pickup up some of the
> > patches for us right now).
> > 
> > I'll check and if it's not I'll try to send him a version of it today.
> 
> Normally filesystem trees are fed to Linus...  Or I can pick that patch via
> VFS tree (and send it to Linus tomorrow).  There also had been Jan's ocfs2
> patch a while ago; I picked only the VFS part of that series, ext* and
> IIRC xfs ones went to corresponding filesystem trees.  Should I just pick
> the ocfs2 stuff from now on?

Andrew's been picking it up.  I'm doing the Acked-by thing, until I have
a test environment back.  Thank you for offering, and if Andrew gets
tired of it before I'm fully operational, we'll happily take you up on
this.

Joel


-- 

"There is no more evil thing on earth than race prejudice, none at 
 all.  I write deliberately -- it is the worst single thing in life 
 now.  It justifies and holds together more baseness, cruelty and
 abomination than any other sort of error in the world." 
        - H. G. Wells

			http://www.jlbec.org/
			jlbec at evilplan.org

Re: OCFS2 mainline state?

[Joel Becker]

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 09:16:18PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 01:11:03PM -0800, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> 
> > I've seen that patch actually and yes it should have been in mainline
> > already. I didn't see whether it's in -mm (Andrew is pickup up some of the
> > patches for us right now).
> > 
> > I'll check and if it's not I'll try to send him a version of it today.
> 
> Normally filesystem trees are fed to Linus...  Or I can pick that patch via
> VFS tree (and send it to Linus tomorrow).  There also had been Jan's ocfs2
> patch a while ago; I picked only the VFS part of that series, ext* and
> IIRC xfs ones went to corresponding filesystem trees.  Should I just pick
> the ocfs2 stuff from now on?

Andrew's been picking it up.  I'm doing the Acked-by thing, until I have
a test environment back.  Thank you for offering, and if Andrew gets
tired of it before I'm fully operational, we'll happily take you up on
this.

Joel


-- 

"There is no more evil thing on earth than race prejudice, none at 
 all.  I write deliberately -- it is the worst single thing in life 
 now.  It justifies and holds together more baseness, cruelty and
 abomination than any other sort of error in the world." 
        - H. G. Wells

			http://www.jlbec.org/
			jlbec@evilplan.org

[Ocfs2-devel] OCFS2 mainline state?

[Mark Fasheh]

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 01:11:03PM -0800, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 09:33:34PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Today I encountered the following problem on v3.8:
> > [   28.940032] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> > ...
> > [   28.984953] Call Trace:
> > [   28.986628   [<ffffffffa04cb200>] ocfs2_fast_symlink_readpage+0x70/0x1b0 [ocfs2]
> > [   28.988302]  [<ffffffff8110dc49>] ? add_to_page_cache_lru+0x29/0x40
> > [   28.989942]  [<ffffffff8110ddca>] do_read_cache_page+0x7a/0x170
> > [   28.991573]  [<ffffffff8110def4>] read_cache_page_async+0x14/0x20
> > [   28.993212]  [<ffffffff8110df09>] read_cache_page+0x9/0x20
> > [   28.994827]  [<ffffffff81170ae5>] page_getlink.isra.9+0x25/0x80
> > [   28.996442]  [<ffffffff81170b61>] page_follow_link_light+0x21/0x40
> > [   28.998049]  [<ffffffff8117090d>] generic_readlink+0x3d/0xa0
> > [   28.999653]  [<ffffffff8116c0db>] sys_readlinkat+0xfb/0x130
> > [   29.001246]  [<ffffffff8116c126>] sys_readlink+0x16/0x20
> > [   29.002839]  [<ffffffff815d8dad>] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f
> 
> I've seen that patch actually and yes it should have been in mainline
> already. I didn't see whether it's in -mm (Andrew is pickup up some of the
> patches for us right now).
> 
> I'll check and if it's not I'll try to send him a version of it today.

Checked - this is in linux-next so I would expect to see it upstream
eventually.
	--Mark

--
Mark Fasheh

Re: OCFS2 mainline state?

[Mark Fasheh]

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 01:11:03PM -0800, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 09:33:34PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Today I encountered the following problem on v3.8:
> > [   28.940032] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> > ...
> > [   28.984953] Call Trace:
> > [   28.986628   [<ffffffffa04cb200>] ocfs2_fast_symlink_readpage+0x70/0x1b0 [ocfs2]
> > [   28.988302]  [<ffffffff8110dc49>] ? add_to_page_cache_lru+0x29/0x40
> > [   28.989942]  [<ffffffff8110ddca>] do_read_cache_page+0x7a/0x170
> > [   28.991573]  [<ffffffff8110def4>] read_cache_page_async+0x14/0x20
> > [   28.993212]  [<ffffffff8110df09>] read_cache_page+0x9/0x20
> > [   28.994827]  [<ffffffff81170ae5>] page_getlink.isra.9+0x25/0x80
> > [   28.996442]  [<ffffffff81170b61>] page_follow_link_light+0x21/0x40
> > [   28.998049]  [<ffffffff8117090d>] generic_readlink+0x3d/0xa0
> > [   28.999653]  [<ffffffff8116c0db>] sys_readlinkat+0xfb/0x130
> > [   29.001246]  [<ffffffff8116c126>] sys_readlink+0x16/0x20
> > [   29.002839]  [<ffffffff815d8dad>] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f
> 
> I've seen that patch actually and yes it should have been in mainline
> already. I didn't see whether it's in -mm (Andrew is pickup up some of the
> patches for us right now).
> 
> I'll check and if it's not I'll try to send him a version of it today.

Checked - this is in linux-next so I would expect to see it upstream
eventually.
	--Mark

--
Mark Fasheh

Re: OCFS2 mainline state?

[Mark Fasheh]

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 01:11:03PM -0800, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 09:33:34PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Today I encountered the following problem on v3.8:
> > [   28.940032] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> > ...
> > [   28.984953] Call Trace:
> > [   28.986628   [<ffffffffa04cb200>] ocfs2_fast_symlink_readpage+0x70/0x1b0 [ocfs2]
> > [   28.988302]  [<ffffffff8110dc49>] ? add_to_page_cache_lru+0x29/0x40
> > [   28.989942]  [<ffffffff8110ddca>] do_read_cache_page+0x7a/0x170
> > [   28.991573]  [<ffffffff8110def4>] read_cache_page_async+0x14/0x20
> > [   28.993212]  [<ffffffff8110df09>] read_cache_page+0x9/0x20
> > [   28.994827]  [<ffffffff81170ae5>] page_getlink.isra.9+0x25/0x80
> > [   28.996442]  [<ffffffff81170b61>] page_follow_link_light+0x21/0x40
> > [   28.998049]  [<ffffffff8117090d>] generic_readlink+0x3d/0xa0
> > [   28.999653]  [<ffffffff8116c0db>] sys_readlinkat+0xfb/0x130
> > [   29.001246]  [<ffffffff8116c126>] sys_readlink+0x16/0x20
> > [   29.002839]  [<ffffffff815d8dad>] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f
> 
> I've seen that patch actually and yes it should have been in mainline
> already. I didn't see whether it's in -mm (Andrew is pickup up some of the
> patches for us right now).
> 
> I'll check and if it's not I'll try to send him a version of it today.

Checked - this is in linux-next so I would expect to see it upstream
eventually.
	--Mark

--
Mark Fasheh

[Ocfs2-devel] OCFS2 mainline state?

[Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner]

Am 25.02.2013 21:33, schrieb Richard Weinberger:
> Hi!
> 
> Today I encountered the following problem on v3.8:
> [   28.940032] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> ...
> [   28.984953] Call Trace:
> [   28.986628   [<ffffffffa04cb200>] ocfs2_fast_symlink_readpage+0x70/0x1b0 [ocfs2]
> [   28.988302]  [<ffffffff8110dc49>] ? add_to_page_cache_lru+0x29/0x40
> [   28.989942]  [<ffffffff8110ddca>] do_read_cache_page+0x7a/0x170
> [   28.991573]  [<ffffffff8110def4>] read_cache_page_async+0x14/0x20
> [   28.993212]  [<ffffffff8110df09>] read_cache_page+0x9/0x20
> [   28.994827]  [<ffffffff81170ae5>] page_getlink.isra.9+0x25/0x80
> [   28.996442]  [<ffffffff81170b61>] page_follow_link_light+0x21/0x40
> [   28.998049]  [<ffffffff8117090d>] generic_readlink+0x3d/0xa0
> [   28.999653]  [<ffffffff8116c0db>] sys_readlinkat+0xfb/0x130
> [   29.001246]  [<ffffffff8116c126>] sys_readlink+0x16/0x20
> [   29.002839]  [<ffffffff815d8dad>] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f
> 
> To my utter astonishment I found out that the issue is known since August 2012.
> And there is also a trivial fix for it.[0]
> The said fix found it's way into Oracle Unbreakable Linux very quickly,
> but not into mainline.[1]
> 
> Now I'm wondering how much Oracle really cares about OCFS2 in mainline?
> Maybe there are some more unfixed vulnerabilities?
> 

I noticed and reported this on 07.02.2013 but got no reply ;(


-- 

Mit freundlichen Gr??en,

Florian Wiessner

Smart Weblications GmbH
Martinsberger Str. 1
D-95119 Naila

fon.: +49 9282 9638 200
fax.: +49 9282 9638 205
24/7: +49 900 144 000 00 - 0,99 EUR/Min*
http://www.smart-weblications.de

--
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Naila
Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Florian Wiessner
HRB-Nr.: HRB 3840 Amtsgericht Hof
*aus dem dt. Festnetz, ggf. abweichende Preise aus dem Mobilfunknetz
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner
	<f.wiessner@smart-weblications.de>
Subject: problem with ocfs2 in 3.7.6 and 3.6.11
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 03:04:27 +0100
Size: 10611
Url: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/attachments/20130225/09e255b0/attachment-0001.mht 

Re: OCFS2 mainline state?

[Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1809 bytes --]

Am 25.02.2013 21:33, schrieb Richard Weinberger:
> Hi!
> 
> Today I encountered the following problem on v3.8:
> [   28.940032] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> ...
> [   28.984953] Call Trace:
> [   28.986628   [<ffffffffa04cb200>] ocfs2_fast_symlink_readpage+0x70/0x1b0 [ocfs2]
> [   28.988302]  [<ffffffff8110dc49>] ? add_to_page_cache_lru+0x29/0x40
> [   28.989942]  [<ffffffff8110ddca>] do_read_cache_page+0x7a/0x170
> [   28.991573]  [<ffffffff8110def4>] read_cache_page_async+0x14/0x20
> [   28.993212]  [<ffffffff8110df09>] read_cache_page+0x9/0x20
> [   28.994827]  [<ffffffff81170ae5>] page_getlink.isra.9+0x25/0x80
> [   28.996442]  [<ffffffff81170b61>] page_follow_link_light+0x21/0x40
> [   28.998049]  [<ffffffff8117090d>] generic_readlink+0x3d/0xa0
> [   28.999653]  [<ffffffff8116c0db>] sys_readlinkat+0xfb/0x130
> [   29.001246]  [<ffffffff8116c126>] sys_readlink+0x16/0x20
> [   29.002839]  [<ffffffff815d8dad>] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f
> 
> To my utter astonishment I found out that the issue is known since August 2012.
> And there is also a trivial fix for it.[0]
> The said fix found it's way into Oracle Unbreakable Linux very quickly,
> but not into mainline.[1]
> 
> Now I'm wondering how much Oracle really cares about OCFS2 in mainline?
> Maybe there are some more unfixed vulnerabilities?
> 

I noticed and reported this on 07.02.2013 but got no reply ;(


-- 

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Florian Wiessner

Smart Weblications GmbH
Martinsberger Str. 1
D-95119 Naila

fon.: +49 9282 9638 200
fax.: +49 9282 9638 205
24/7: +49 900 144 000 00 - 0,99 EUR/Min*
http://www.smart-weblications.de

--
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Naila
Geschäftsführer: Florian Wiessner
HRB-Nr.: HRB 3840 Amtsgericht Hof
*aus dem dt. Festnetz, ggf. abweichende Preise aus dem Mobilfunknetz

[-- Attachment #2: Nachricht als Anhang --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 10406 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5118 bytes --]

Hi All,


Today i found a problem in linux 3.7.6 with ocfs2 when using ocfs2 from inside a
chroot or linux-vserver guest. This problem also exists at least in 3.6.11.

how to reproduce:

node:~# cat /etc/debian_version
6.0.6

node:~# rbd showmapped
id pool image snap device
1  rbd  ocfs2 -    /dev/rbd1

mounted ocfs2 fs on rdb device on /ocfs2:
/dev/rbd1 on /ocfs2 type ocfs2 (rw,_netdev,noatime,data=writeback,heartbeat=local)


mount --bind /ocfs2 /var/lib/vservers/www/ocfs2
chroot /var/lib/vservers/www


www:/# cat /etc/debian_version
5.0.10

DocumentRoots for apache are on ocfs2

/etc/init.d/apache2 start


Then apache hangs and i have to reboot, see trace (annotated with addr2line
where available):

[  225.548824] general protection fault: 0000[#1] PREEMPT SMP
[  225.549067] Modules linked in: ipt_REJECT xt_multiport arpt_mangle
arptable_filter arp_tables ip6table_filter ip6_tables iptable_filter ip_tables
ebtable_nat ebtables x_tables cpufreq_userspace cpufreq_powersave
cpufreq_ondemand cpufreq_conservative ocfs2_stack_o2cb bridge stp llc bonding
fuse ocfs2_dlm ocfs2_dlmfs dlm sctp ocfs2 ocfs2_nodemanager ocfs2_stackglue
configfs rbd acpi_cpufreq mperf coretemp kvm_intel kvm psmouse serio_raw lpc_ich
mfd_core i2c_i801 evdev i2c_core btrfs lzo_compress
[  225.551698] CPU 1
[  225.551755] Pid: 5888, comm: apache2 Not tainted 3.7.6 #1 Supermicro
X9SCI/X9SCA/X9SCI/X9SCA
[  225.551913] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81299f30>] [<ffffffff81299f30>]
strnlen+0x10/0x19    /lib/string.c:405
[  225.552059] RSP: 0018:ffff8808160a3b80  EFLAGS: 00010216
[  225.552135] RAX: e8894402000000a5 RBX: e8894402000000a5 RCX: 000000000063ea4c
[  225.552215] RDX: 000000000063ea4c RSI: 0000000000000f3f RDI: e8894402000000a5
[  225.552294] RBP: ffffea00170650b8 R08: ffffffff810b8c7e R09: 0000000000000000
[  225.552374] R10: ffff880816b50100 R11: ffff880816b50100 R12: ffff8806974afbf8
[  225.552450] R13: 00000000000200da R14: 00000000000201da R15: 0000000000000000
[  225.552530] FS:  00007eff6d9e2750(0000) GS:ffff88083fc40000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[  225.552625] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  225.552701] CR2: 00007fa71e7fbd40 CR3: 00000007f7849000 CR4: 00000000000407e0
[  225.552778] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[  225.552858] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[  225.552938] Process apache2 (pid: 5888, threadinfo ffff8808160a2000, task
ffff880816b50100)
[  225.553032] Stack:
[  225.553103]  ffffffffa06d7d27 ffffea00170650b8 ffff8806974afd38 ffffea00170650b8
[  225.553408]  ffffffff810b8c7e 0000000000000000 ffff8806974afd38 ffffea00170650b8
[  225.553711]  ffffffff810b8ddd ffff8808160a3ca8 ffffffffa06d7c20 ffff8806974d2440
[  225.554016] Call Trace:
[  225.554098] [<ffffffffa06d7d27>] ?
ocfs2_fast_symlink_readpage+0x107/0x1a0[ocfs2]   ??:0
[  225.554194] [<ffffffff810b8c7e>] ? add_to_page_cache_lru+0x2c/0x36
        /include/linux/swap.h:253
[  225.554272] [<ffffffff810b8ddd>] ? do_read_cache_page+0x8f/0x132
        /mm/filemap.c:1802
[  225.554359] [<ffffffffa06d7c20>] ? ocfs2_osb_debug_open+0x670/0x670[ocfs2]
       ??:0
[  225.554442] [<ffffffff810b8ebf>] ? read_cache_page+0x9/0x12
        /mm/filemap.c:1921
[  225.554521] [<ffffffff8110d1e1>] ? page_getlink+0x25/0x86
        /fs/namei.c:3956
[  225.554598] [<ffffffff8110d25d>] ? page_follow_link_light+0x1b/0x2c
        /include/linux/namei.h:88
[  225.554675] [<ffffffff8110e90c>] ? link_path_walk+0x400/0x7c5
        /fs/namei.c:851
[  225.554751] [<ffffffff8110f133>] ? path_lookupat+0x52/0x6cf
        /fs/namei.c:1983
[  225.554835] [<ffffffff8110f7d0>] ? filename_lookup+0x20/0x92
        /fs/namei.c:2024
[  225.554922] [<ffffffff81111a78>] ? getname_flags+0x70/0x146
        /fs/namei.c:159
[  225.554997] [<ffffffff81112376>] ? user_path_at_empty+0x49/0x7d
        /fs/namei.c:2172
[  225.555077] [<ffffffff8104dbee>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x2a/0x2a
        /kernel/wait.c:174
[  225.555155] [<ffffffff811093d4>] ? cp_new_stat+0x10d/0x11f
        /fs/stat.c:241
[  225.555231] [<ffffffff811095d1>] ? vfs_fstatat+0x39/0x66
        /fs/stat.c:89
[  225.555314] [<ffffffff811096c8>] ? sys_newstat+0x11/0x2d
        /fs/stat.c:248
[  225.555402] [<ffffffff81542dd2>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
        /arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:645
[  225.555480] Code: f6 82 30 a9 58 81 20 75 f1 c3 48 89 f8 eb 03 48 ff c0 80 38
00 75 f8 48 29 f8 c3 48 89 f8 eb 03 48 ff c0 48 85 f6 74 08 48 ff ce <80> 38 00
75 f0 48 29 f8 c3 31 c0 eb 14 44 38 c1 74 0c 48 ff c2
[  225.559020] RIP [<ffffffff81299f30>] strnlen+0x10/0x19
        /lib/string.c:405
[  225.559143]  RSP <ffff8808160a3b80>
[  225.559254] ---[ end trace 10bd8a6b280d52b1 ]---

-- 

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Florian Wiessner

Smart Weblications GmbH
Martinsberger Str. 1
D-95119 Naila

fon.: +49 9282 9638 200
fax.: +49 9282 9638 205
24/7: +49 900 144 000 00 - 0,99 EUR/Min*
http://www.smart-weblications.de

--
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Naila
Geschäftsführer: Florian Wiessner
HRB-Nr.: HRB 3840 Amtsgericht Hof
*aus dem dt. Festnetz, ggf. abweichende Preise aus dem Mobilfunknetz

[-- Attachment #2.1.2: trace.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4258 bytes --]

[  225.548824] general protection fault: 0000[#1] PREEMPT SMP
[  225.549067] Modules linked in: ipt_REJECT xt_multiport arpt_mangle arptable_filter arp_tables ip6table_filter ip6_tables iptable_filter ip_tables ebtable_nat ebtables x_tables cpufreq_userspace cpufreq_powersave cpufreq_ondemand cpufreq_conservative ocfs2_stack_o2cb bridge stp llc bonding fuse ocfs2_dlm ocfs2_dlmfs dlm sctp ocfs2 ocfs2_nodemanager ocfs2_stackglue configfs rbd acpi_cpufreq mperf coretemp kvm_intel kvm psmouse serio_raw lpc_ich mfd_core i2c_i801 evdev i2c_core btrfs lzo_compress
[  225.551698] CPU 1
[  225.551755] Pid: 5888, comm: apache2 Not tainted 3.7.6 #1 Supermicro X9SCI/X9SCA/X9SCI/X9SCA
[  225.551913] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81299f30>] [<ffffffff81299f30>] strnlen+0x10/0x19    /lib/string.c:405
[  225.552059] RSP: 0018:ffff8808160a3b80  EFLAGS: 00010216
[  225.552135] RAX: e8894402000000a5 RBX: e8894402000000a5 RCX: 000000000063ea4c
[  225.552215] RDX: 000000000063ea4c RSI: 0000000000000f3f RDI: e8894402000000a5
[  225.552294] RBP: ffffea00170650b8 R08: ffffffff810b8c7e R09: 0000000000000000
[  225.552374] R10: ffff880816b50100 R11: ffff880816b50100 R12: ffff8806974afbf8
[  225.552450] R13: 00000000000200da R14: 00000000000201da R15: 0000000000000000
[  225.552530] FS:  00007eff6d9e2750(0000) GS:ffff88083fc40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[  225.552625] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  225.552701] CR2: 00007fa71e7fbd40 CR3: 00000007f7849000 CR4: 00000000000407e0
[  225.552778] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[  225.552858] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[  225.552938] Process apache2 (pid: 5888, threadinfo ffff8808160a2000, task ffff880816b50100)
[  225.553032] Stack:
[  225.553103]  ffffffffa06d7d27 ffffea00170650b8 ffff8806974afd38 ffffea00170650b8
[  225.553408]  ffffffff810b8c7e 0000000000000000 ffff8806974afd38 ffffea00170650b8
[  225.553711]  ffffffff810b8ddd ffff8808160a3ca8 ffffffffa06d7c20 ffff8806974d2440
[  225.554016] Call Trace:
[  225.554098] [<ffffffffa06d7d27>] ? ocfs2_fast_symlink_readpage+0x107/0x1a0[ocfs2]   ??:0         
[  225.554194] [<ffffffff810b8c7e>] ? add_to_page_cache_lru+0x2c/0x36                   /include/linux/swap.h:253
[  225.554272] [<ffffffff810b8ddd>] ? do_read_cache_page+0x8f/0x132                     /mm/filemap.c:1802
[  225.554359] [<ffffffffa06d7c20>] ? ocfs2_osb_debug_open+0x670/0x670[ocfs2]          ??:0
[  225.554442] [<ffffffff810b8ebf>] ? read_cache_page+0x9/0x12                          /mm/filemap.c:1921
[  225.554521] [<ffffffff8110d1e1>] ? page_getlink+0x25/0x86                            /fs/namei.c:3956
[  225.554598] [<ffffffff8110d25d>] ? page_follow_link_light+0x1b/0x2c                  /include/linux/namei.h:88
[  225.554675] [<ffffffff8110e90c>] ? link_path_walk+0x400/0x7c5                        /fs/namei.c:851
[  225.554751] [<ffffffff8110f133>] ? path_lookupat+0x52/0x6cf                          /fs/namei.c:1983
[  225.554835] [<ffffffff8110f7d0>] ? filename_lookup+0x20/0x92                         /fs/namei.c:2024
[  225.554922] [<ffffffff81111a78>] ? getname_flags+0x70/0x146                          /fs/namei.c:159
[  225.554997] [<ffffffff81112376>] ? user_path_at_empty+0x49/0x7d                      /fs/namei.c:2172
[  225.555077] [<ffffffff8104dbee>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x2a/0x2a                /kernel/wait.c:174
[  225.555155] [<ffffffff811093d4>] ? cp_new_stat+0x10d/0x11f                           /fs/stat.c:241
[  225.555231] [<ffffffff811095d1>] ? vfs_fstatat+0x39/0x66                             /fs/stat.c:89
[  225.555314] [<ffffffff811096c8>] ? sys_newstat+0x11/0x2d                             /fs/stat.c:248
[  225.555402] [<ffffffff81542dd2>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b                    /arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:645
[  225.555480] Code: f6 82 30 a9 58 81 20 75 f1 c3 48 89 f8 eb 03 48 ff c0 80 38 00 75 f8 48 29 f8 c3 48 89 f8 eb 03 48 ff c0 48 85 f6 74 08 48 ff ce <80> 38 00 75 f0 48 29 f8 c3 31 c0 eb 14 44 38 c1 74 0c 48 ff c2
[  225.559020] RIP [<ffffffff81299f30>] strnlen+0x10/0x19                               /lib/string.c:405
[  225.559143]  RSP <ffff8808160a3b80>
[  225.559254] ---[ end trace 10bd8a6b280d52b1 ]---

[Ocfs2-devel] OCFS2 mainline state?

[Vincent ETIENNE]

Hi

I was testing this path in august and  i have two patch applied for ocfs2
The one your referring and also  a changed in file.c

At the time of the test, the two patch were necessary ( and both
suppress a BUG although
not the same one)

Sorry i have no idea if it's still necessary or not, but i prefer to
send you a notice


Vincent ETIENNE


--- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
@@ -1998,7 +1998,7 @@ static long ocfs2_fallocate(struct file *file, int
mode, loff_t offset,
        sr.l_start = (s64)offset;
        sr.l_len = (s64)len;
 
-       return __ocfs2_change_file_space(NULL, inode, offset, cmd, &sr,
+       return __ocfs2_change_file_space(file, inode, offset, cmd, &sr,
                                         change_size);
 }
 
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/symlink.c b/fs/ocfs2/symlink.c
index f1fbb4b..66edce7 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/symlink.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/symlink.c
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
 static int ocfs2_fast_symlink_readpage(struct file *unused, struct page
*page)
 {
        struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
-       struct buffer_head *bh;
+       struct buffer_head *bh = NULL;
        int status = ocfs2_read_inode_block(inode, &bh);
        struct ocfs2_dinode *fe;
        const char *link;





Le 25/02/2013 21:33, Richard Weinberger a ?crit :
> Hi!
>
> Today I encountered the following problem on v3.8:
> [   28.940032] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> ...
> [   28.984953] Call Trace:
> [   28.986628   [<ffffffffa04cb200>]
> ocfs2_fast_symlink_readpage+0x70/0x1b0 [ocfs2]
> [   28.988302]  [<ffffffff8110dc49>] ? add_to_page_cache_lru+0x29/0x40
> [   28.989942]  [<ffffffff8110ddca>] do_read_cache_page+0x7a/0x170
> [   28.991573]  [<ffffffff8110def4>] read_cache_page_async+0x14/0x20
> [   28.993212]  [<ffffffff8110df09>] read_cache_page+0x9/0x20
> [   28.994827]  [<ffffffff81170ae5>] page_getlink.isra.9+0x25/0x80
> [   28.996442]  [<ffffffff81170b61>] page_follow_link_light+0x21/0x40
> [   28.998049]  [<ffffffff8117090d>] generic_readlink+0x3d/0xa0
> [   28.999653]  [<ffffffff8116c0db>] sys_readlinkat+0xfb/0x130
> [   29.001246]  [<ffffffff8116c126>] sys_readlink+0x16/0x20
> [   29.002839]  [<ffffffff815d8dad>] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f
>
> To my utter astonishment I found out that the issue is known since
> August 2012.
> And there is also a trivial fix for it.[0]
> The said fix found it's way into Oracle Unbreakable Linux very quickly,
> but not into mainline.[1]
>
> Now I'm wondering how much Oracle really cares about OCFS2 in mainline?
> Maybe there are some more unfixed vulnerabilities?
>
> Not amused,
> //richard
>
> [0] http://www.mail-archive.com/ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com/msg07774.html
> [1] https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/el-errata/2012-October/003103.html
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

Re: OCFS2 mainline state?

[Vincent ETIENNE]

Hi

I was testing this path in august and  i have two patch applied for ocfs2
The one your referring and also  a changed in file.c

At the time of the test, the two patch were necessary ( and both
suppress a BUG although
not the same one)

Sorry i have no idea if it's still necessary or not, but i prefer to
send you a notice


Vincent ETIENNE


--- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c
@@ -1998,7 +1998,7 @@ static long ocfs2_fallocate(struct file *file, int
mode, loff_t offset,
        sr.l_start = (s64)offset;
        sr.l_len = (s64)len;
 
-       return __ocfs2_change_file_space(NULL, inode, offset, cmd, &sr,
+       return __ocfs2_change_file_space(file, inode, offset, cmd, &sr,
                                         change_size);
 }
 
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/symlink.c b/fs/ocfs2/symlink.c
index f1fbb4b..66edce7 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/symlink.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/symlink.c
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
 static int ocfs2_fast_symlink_readpage(struct file *unused, struct page
*page)
 {
        struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
-       struct buffer_head *bh;
+       struct buffer_head *bh = NULL;
        int status = ocfs2_read_inode_block(inode, &bh);
        struct ocfs2_dinode *fe;
        const char *link;





Le 25/02/2013 21:33, Richard Weinberger a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> Today I encountered the following problem on v3.8:
> [   28.940032] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> ...
> [   28.984953] Call Trace:
> [   28.986628   [<ffffffffa04cb200>]
> ocfs2_fast_symlink_readpage+0x70/0x1b0 [ocfs2]
> [   28.988302]  [<ffffffff8110dc49>] ? add_to_page_cache_lru+0x29/0x40
> [   28.989942]  [<ffffffff8110ddca>] do_read_cache_page+0x7a/0x170
> [   28.991573]  [<ffffffff8110def4>] read_cache_page_async+0x14/0x20
> [   28.993212]  [<ffffffff8110df09>] read_cache_page+0x9/0x20
> [   28.994827]  [<ffffffff81170ae5>] page_getlink.isra.9+0x25/0x80
> [   28.996442]  [<ffffffff81170b61>] page_follow_link_light+0x21/0x40
> [   28.998049]  [<ffffffff8117090d>] generic_readlink+0x3d/0xa0
> [   28.999653]  [<ffffffff8116c0db>] sys_readlinkat+0xfb/0x130
> [   29.001246]  [<ffffffff8116c126>] sys_readlink+0x16/0x20
> [   29.002839]  [<ffffffff815d8dad>] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f
>
> To my utter astonishment I found out that the issue is known since
> August 2012.
> And there is also a trivial fix for it.[0]
> The said fix found it's way into Oracle Unbreakable Linux very quickly,
> but not into mainline.[1]
>
> Now I'm wondering how much Oracle really cares about OCFS2 in mainline?
> Maybe there are some more unfixed vulnerabilities?
>
> Not amused,
> //richard
>
> [0] http://www.mail-archive.com/ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com/msg07774.html
> [1] https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/el-errata/2012-October/003103.html
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>