From: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Matthias Schniedermeyer" <ms@citd.de>,
"Holger Hoffstätte" <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com>,
"Jonathan Nieder" <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
"Tilman Schmidt" <tilman@imap.cc>,
kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com,
"Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski" <herton.krzesinski@canonical.com>
Subject: Stable backport request, Was: Re: [regression] external HDD in USB3 enclosure cannot be dynamically removed (Re: Linux 3.7.5)
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 14:10:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130305221050.GC8339@xanatos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130301164839.GA5435@kroah.com>
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 08:48:39AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 02:12:50PM -0800, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 01:31:29PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 01:08:46PM -0800, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 09:04:13PM +0100, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> > > > > On 13.02.2013 11:33, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> > > > Greg,
> > > >
> > > > How do you want to handle this? The above four patches should go into
> > > > 3.8 and stable, but they're not currently in Linus' tree and it's
> > > > probably too late in the cycle to merge them this week. Should we just
> > > > wait until 3.9 is out and put the patches into the stable trees then?
> > >
> > > > My email shows that the bad commit
> > > > f7965c0846d74b270e246c1470ca955d5078eb07 has been added to the 3.2, 3.4,
> > > > and 3.7 stable trees, as well as Canonical's 3.7 stable tree. I'm also
> > > > fine with just reverting that commit from 3.8 and stable.
> > >
> > > It's probably easier at this point in time to just revert that commit,
> > > leave the stable kernels alone, and then everything will be fixed in
> > > 3.9. When the commits go into Linus's tree, we can backport everything
> > > to the stable releases (including 3.8.1) at that point.
> > >
> > > As long as someone remembers to send the needed information to
> > > stable@vger.kernel.org, I know I'll forget :)
> > >
> > > Sound ok?
> >
> > Yep, sounds fine. I'll attempt to remember to send email to stable once
> > 3.9 is out.
>
> Did this happen yet?
Nope. Here's the upstream commit IDs of the patches that need to be
backported to stable. Let me know if you need them in patch form:
d3b9d7a9051d7024a93c76a84b2f84b3b66ad6d5 USB: Fix connected device switch to Inactive state.
a24a6078754f28528bc91e7e7b3e6ae86bd936d8 USB: Rip out recursive call on warm port reset.
2d4fa940f99663c82ba55b2244638833b388e4e2 USB: Prepare for refactoring by adding extra udev checks.
0fe51aa5eee51db7c7ecd201d42a977ad79c58b6 USB: Don't use EHCI port sempahore for USB 3.0 hubs.
Sarah Sharp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-05 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-28 4:56 Linux 3.7.5 Greg KH
2013-01-28 4:57 ` Greg KH
[not found] ` <pan.2013.01.28.11.42.16.556318@googlemail.com>
2013-01-28 14:39 ` Greg KH
[not found] ` <pan.2013.01.28.20.33.44.918987@googlemail.com>
2013-01-28 20:46 ` [regression] external HDD in USB3 enclosure cannot be dynamically removed (Re: Linux 3.7.5) Jonathan Nieder
2013-02-12 0:40 ` Sarah Sharp
2013-02-12 0:54 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-02-12 8:36 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2013-02-12 10:35 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2013-02-12 20:42 ` Sarah Sharp
2013-02-12 20:42 ` Sarah Sharp
2013-02-13 8:28 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2013-02-13 17:16 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2013-02-13 17:16 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2013-02-13 19:33 ` Sarah Sharp
2013-02-13 19:33 ` Sarah Sharp
2013-02-13 20:04 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2013-02-13 20:04 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2013-02-13 21:08 ` Sarah Sharp
2013-02-13 21:08 ` Sarah Sharp
2013-02-13 21:31 ` Greg KH
2013-02-13 21:31 ` Greg KH
2013-02-13 22:12 ` Sarah Sharp
2013-02-13 22:12 ` Sarah Sharp
2013-03-01 16:48 ` Greg KH
2013-03-01 16:48 ` Greg KH
2013-03-05 22:10 ` Sarah Sharp [this message]
2013-03-06 2:11 ` Stable backport request, Was: " Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130305221050.GC8339@xanatos \
--to=sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=herton.krzesinski@canonical.com \
--cc=holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ms@citd.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tilman@imap.cc \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.