From: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Cc: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com>, Julien FERRERO <jferrero06@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: XFS filesystem corruption
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:57:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201303121057.52092.Martin@lichtvoll.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130307232214.GY23616@dastard>
Am Freitag, 8. März 2013 schrieb Dave Chinner:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 02:15:31PM +0100, Julien FERRERO wrote:
> > > We actually test brutal "Power off" for xfs, ext4 and other file
> > > systems. If your storage is configured properly and you have
> > > barriers enabled, they all pass without corruption.
> > >
> > > What hardware raid cards can do is to hide a volatile write cache.
> > > Either on the raid HBA itself or, even worse, on the backend disks
> > > behind the card. S-ata disks tend to default to write cache enabled
> > > and need to be checked especially careful (sas drives tend to be
> > > write cache disabled by default).
> >
> >
> >
> > Write cache is supposed to be disabled on the H/W RAID (according to
> > hdparm) and barrier are correctly enabled since xfs does not report
> > any warning at mount.
> >
> >
> >
> > The odd thing is we never see this with kernel 2.6.18 where barriers
> > weren't yet available.
>
> Yes they were. XFS had barrier support added in 2.6.15.
I thought this was 2.6.16? Or was that the kernel where it became usable due
to the generic write barrier part being merged while the XFS one was ready
earlier?
I still remember the XFS filesystem crashes I had back then that went away
with disabling the write cache of the drive in my ThinkPad T42 back then and
where solved with 2.6.17, whereas 2.6.17.7 solved a directory corruption
issue introduced with 2.6.17. Thus I always recommended at least 2.6.17.7 in
case of write barrier usage with XFS.
Thanks,
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-12 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-06 15:08 XFS filesystem corruption Julien FERRERO
2013-03-06 15:15 ` Emmanuel Florac
2013-03-06 16:16 ` Julien FERRERO
2013-03-06 16:47 ` Ric Wheeler
2013-03-06 22:21 ` Emmanuel Florac
2013-03-06 23:12 ` Ric Wheeler
2013-03-07 13:15 ` Julien FERRERO
2013-03-07 13:40 ` Ric Wheeler
2013-03-07 23:22 ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-08 10:16 ` Julien FERRERO
2013-03-12 9:57 ` Martin Steigerwald [this message]
2013-03-08 8:39 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-03-08 10:17 ` Julien FERRERO
2013-03-08 12:20 ` Ric Wheeler
2013-03-08 18:59 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-03-09 9:11 ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-09 18:51 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-03-10 22:45 ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-10 23:54 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-03-11 0:50 ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-11 9:29 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-03-11 22:45 ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-11 9:25 ` Julien FERRERO
2013-03-12 10:54 ` Emmanuel Florac
2013-03-12 10:42 ` Martin Steigerwald
2013-03-12 22:16 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-03-07 3:56 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-03-07 13:04 ` Julien FERRERO
2013-03-07 13:32 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-03-10 2:50 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-10 22:11 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201303121057.52092.Martin@lichtvoll.de \
--to=martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=jferrero06@gmail.com \
--cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.