From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Julien FERRERO <jferrero06@gmail.com>
Cc: stan@hardwarefreak.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS filesystem corruption
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 20:50:13 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <513BF4E5.8080006@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcwv6yAHAsmwgROs12gRtCbqTXBvTPrx8F-e4kYab2YApsobg@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/7/13 7:04 AM, Julien FERRERO wrote:
>> It may be unrelated to your corruption, problem but I'm curious why you
>> are specifying a 32MB log section instead of letting mkfs.xfs make the
>> log size decision.
>
> I honestly don' know, the rebuild script was written 8 years ago by an
> engineer that since left the company.
>
> Is 32MB a short log space for a 1.5 TB of data ?
$ mkfs.xfs -dfile,name=fsfile,size=1536g
meta-data=fsfile isize=256 agcount=4, agsize=100663296 blks
= sectsz=512 attr=2, projid32bit=0
data = bsize=4096 blocks=402653184, imaxpct=5
= sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0
log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=196608, version=2
= sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
Default would be 768M w/ current xfsprogs.
So I'd say yes it's short. You might do well to re-examine any old, crufty
"engineer left a while ago" tunings. Defaults are defaults for a reason,
if you don't know why you're tuning something it may well be the wrong
choice.
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-10 2:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-06 15:08 XFS filesystem corruption Julien FERRERO
2013-03-06 15:15 ` Emmanuel Florac
2013-03-06 16:16 ` Julien FERRERO
2013-03-06 16:47 ` Ric Wheeler
2013-03-06 22:21 ` Emmanuel Florac
2013-03-06 23:12 ` Ric Wheeler
2013-03-07 13:15 ` Julien FERRERO
2013-03-07 13:40 ` Ric Wheeler
2013-03-07 23:22 ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-08 10:16 ` Julien FERRERO
2013-03-12 9:57 ` Martin Steigerwald
2013-03-08 8:39 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-03-08 10:17 ` Julien FERRERO
2013-03-08 12:20 ` Ric Wheeler
2013-03-08 18:59 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-03-09 9:11 ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-09 18:51 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-03-10 22:45 ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-10 23:54 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-03-11 0:50 ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-11 9:29 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-03-11 22:45 ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-11 9:25 ` Julien FERRERO
2013-03-12 10:54 ` Emmanuel Florac
2013-03-12 10:42 ` Martin Steigerwald
2013-03-12 22:16 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-03-07 3:56 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-03-07 13:04 ` Julien FERRERO
2013-03-07 13:32 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-03-10 2:50 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2013-03-10 22:11 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=513BF4E5.8080006@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=jferrero06@gmail.com \
--cc=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.