All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: "Ивайло Димитров" <freemangordon@abv.bg>
Cc: pali.rohar@gmail.com, nm@ti.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 08:58:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130328155803.GT10155@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24838523.73311.1364448607026.JavaMail.apache@mail82.abv.bg>

* Ивайло Димитров <freemangordon@abv.bg> [130327 22:34]:
>  Tony,
> 
> Who do you expect to make that code merge? Do you expect us to mechanically merge RX51 PPA API patch with the existing generic OMAP PPA API code putting #ifdefs all over the place? Not that it is impossible, but the only real piece of HW I have here is n900, so I just can't be sure the code will still work on the other platforms besides RX51, once the code modified. Please, advice on how to proceed.

Probably ifdefs won't work nice for other omapss. It seems that
your original patch is pretty close based on all that's been
discussed. Can you please repost with a proper patch description
also summarizing why we cannot have generci SMC API as discussed?

Thanks,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 08:58:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130328155803.GT10155@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24838523.73311.1364448607026.JavaMail.apache@mail82.abv.bg>

* ?????? ???????? <freemangordon@abv.bg> [130327 22:34]:
>  Tony,
> 
> Who do you expect to make that code merge? Do you expect us to mechanically merge RX51 PPA API patch with the existing generic OMAP PPA API code putting #ifdefs all over the place? Not that it is impossible, but the only real piece of HW I have here is n900, so I just can't be sure the code will still work on the other platforms besides RX51, once the code modified. Please, advice on how to proceed.

Probably ifdefs won't work nice for other omapss. It seems that
your original patch is pretty close based on all that's been
discussed. Can you please repost with a proper patch description
also summarizing why we cannot have generci SMC API as discussed?

Thanks,

Tony

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: "Ивайло Димитров" <freemangordon@abv.bg>
Cc: pali.rohar@gmail.com, nm@ti.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 08:58:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130328155803.GT10155@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24838523.73311.1364448607026.JavaMail.apache@mail82.abv.bg>

* Ивайло Димитров <freemangordon@abv.bg> [130327 22:34]:
>  Tony,
> 
> Who do you expect to make that code merge? Do you expect us to mechanically merge RX51 PPA API patch with the existing generic OMAP PPA API code putting #ifdefs all over the place? Not that it is impossible, but the only real piece of HW I have here is n900, so I just can't be sure the code will still work on the other platforms besides RX51, once the code modified. Please, advice on how to proceed.

Probably ifdefs won't work nice for other omapss. It seems that
your original patch is pretty close based on all that's been
discussed. Can you please repost with a proper patch description
also summarizing why we cannot have generci SMC API as discussed?

Thanks,

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-28 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-28  5:30 [PATCH] arm: omap: RX-51: ARM errata 430973 workaround Ивайло Димитров
2013-03-28 15:58 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2013-03-28 15:58   ` Tony Lindgren
2013-03-28 15:58   ` Tony Lindgren
2013-03-31 13:54   ` [PATCH] " Pali Rohár
2013-03-31 13:54     ` Pali Rohár
2013-04-01  8:33     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-01  8:33       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-04-01  8:33       ` Santosh Shilimkar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-03-30 22:31 [PATCH] arm: omap: " Ивайло Димитров
2013-03-31  7:37 ` Pavel Machek
2013-03-31  7:37   ` Pavel Machek
2013-03-06  9:32 Ивайло Димитров
2013-03-01 10:09 Ивайло Димитров
2013-03-01 23:51 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-03-01 23:51   ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-03-01 23:51   ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-03-01  7:47 Ивайло Димитров
2013-03-01 14:38 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-03-01 14:38   ` Nishanth Menon
2013-03-04 18:58   ` Tony Lindgren
2013-03-04 18:58     ` Tony Lindgren
2013-03-06 14:09     ` Pali Rohár
2013-03-06 14:09       ` Pali Rohár
2013-03-06 17:51       ` Tony Lindgren
2013-03-06 17:51         ` Tony Lindgren
2013-03-06 19:13         ` Pali Rohár
2013-03-06 19:13           ` Pali Rohár
2013-03-24 14:26           ` Pali Rohár
2013-03-24 14:26             ` Pali Rohár
2013-03-27 20:56             ` Tony Lindgren
2013-03-27 20:56               ` Tony Lindgren
2013-03-27 20:56               ` Tony Lindgren
2013-03-27 21:05               ` Pali Rohár
2013-03-27 21:05                 ` Pali Rohár
2013-03-27 21:12                 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-03-27 21:12                   ` Tony Lindgren
2013-03-28  9:50               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-28  9:50                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-28 10:07                 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-28 10:07                   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-28 15:53                   ` Tony Lindgren
2013-03-28 15:53                     ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-28  9:42 Pali Rohár
2013-02-28  9:42 ` Pali Rohár
2013-02-28  9:42 ` Pali Rohár
2013-02-28 14:40 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-02-28 14:40   ` Nishanth Menon
2013-02-28 14:40   ` Nishanth Menon
2013-03-01  9:43 ` Peter De Schrijver
2013-03-01  9:43   ` Peter De Schrijver
2013-03-30 18:36 ` Pavel Machek
2013-03-30 18:36   ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130328155803.GT10155@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=freemangordon@abv.bg \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.