From: Alex Hacker <hacker@epn.ru>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Fixing the rate and rate relationship to OFDM
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 21:03:24 +0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130330150324.GA13043@infinet.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmonCXomWbD-9fTEPhAyLxdEJU767Fa0chx9E4YQaeL9Gqw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Adrian,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 06:27:53AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Yup. Either is kinda frightening though! Even a back-to-back frame
> transmission with CCA disabled is bordering on unhappiness.
Yeah! Although it is all nothing compared to 1kW microwave oven or 500kW weather radar. :)
> IIRC, there's ETSI requirements that tones are generated to test centre
> frequency accuracies. I thought that the FCC had those too?
I think yes in some way. I ask the authoritative people at the morinig they did both
procedures.
> Adrian
Best regards,
Alex.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-30 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-27 18:49 [ath9k-devel] Fixing the rate and rate relationship to OFDM John Clark
2013-03-28 11:32 ` shinnazar
2013-03-28 17:45 ` John Clark
2013-03-28 18:19 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-03-28 19:29 ` John Clark
2013-03-28 19:58 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-04-02 13:04 ` Holger Schurig
2013-04-02 14:57 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-04-02 18:15 ` John Clark
2013-04-02 20:08 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-04-02 23:05 ` Jerald A DeLong
2013-04-02 23:35 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-04-02 13:51 ` Peter Stuge
2013-04-02 14:55 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-04-02 16:43 ` Peter Stuge
2013-04-02 16:49 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-04-02 17:03 ` Peter Stuge
2013-04-02 17:38 ` John Clark
2013-03-29 5:23 ` Alex Hacker
2013-03-29 17:10 ` John Clark
2013-03-29 17:47 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-03-30 12:32 ` Alex Hacker
2013-03-30 13:27 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-03-30 15:03 ` Alex Hacker [this message]
2013-03-30 15:20 ` Alex Hacker
2013-04-01 8:14 ` Alex Hacker
2013-04-01 21:29 ` Adrian Chadd
2013-03-28 19:00 ` Felix Fietkau
2013-03-28 19:32 ` John Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130330150324.GA13043@infinet.ru \
--to=hacker@epn.ru \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.