From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: ux500: update V-INTCORE constraints
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 10:24:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130402092446.GB4375@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130402084446.GA6850@balto.lan>
> > > I know that Lee's been sending off a large set of regulator patches
> > > lately, some include alterations to this platform config.
> >
> > > Maybe it's better to take this patch into the regulator tree if these
> > > machine configs will come in that way? Also like Lee to have a
> > > look at this...
> >
> > If it's touching the board constraints it's likely to have conflicts
> > with Lee's stuff, yes.
>
> Lee's patches are on -next
Not all of them are on -next, but all are on the MLs.
I'm currently fixing up some of Mark's review comments in order to
re-submit the remainder.
> and should not conflict with this one
> (tested again on today's tree), but it may be nice anyway to have this
> in the regulator framework with the others.
> Mark, would you consider taking this one in your tree?
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: ux500: update V-INTCORE constraints
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 10:24:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130402092446.GB4375@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130402084446.GA6850@balto.lan>
> > > I know that Lee's been sending off a large set of regulator patches
> > > lately, some include alterations to this platform config.
> >
> > > Maybe it's better to take this patch into the regulator tree if these
> > > machine configs will come in that way? Also like Lee to have a
> > > look at this...
> >
> > If it's touching the board constraints it's likely to have conflicts
> > with Lee's stuff, yes.
>
> Lee's patches are on -next
Not all of them are on -next, but all are on the MLs.
I'm currently fixing up some of Mark's review comments in order to
re-submit the remainder.
> and should not conflict with this one
> (tested again on today's tree), but it may be nice anyway to have this
> in the regulator framework with the others.
> Mark, would you consider taking this one in your tree?
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-02 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-27 15:21 [PATCH] ARM: ux500: update V-INTCORE constraints Fabio Baltieri
2013-03-27 15:21 ` Fabio Baltieri
2013-04-02 8:26 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-02 8:26 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-02 8:38 ` Mark Brown
2013-04-02 8:38 ` Mark Brown
2013-04-02 8:44 ` Fabio Baltieri
2013-04-02 8:44 ` Fabio Baltieri
2013-04-02 8:46 ` Mark Brown
2013-04-02 8:46 ` Mark Brown
2013-04-02 8:51 ` [PATCH RESEND] " Fabio Baltieri
2013-04-02 8:51 ` Fabio Baltieri
2013-04-02 9:23 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-02 9:23 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-02 9:34 ` Fabio Baltieri
2013-04-02 9:34 ` Fabio Baltieri
2013-04-02 9:24 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2013-04-02 9:24 ` [PATCH] " Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130402092446.GB4375@gmail.com \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.