From: keld@keldix.com
To: Peter Landmann <sfrazt@googlemail.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Solving the raid write performance problems
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 16:14:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130402141418.GA2941@www5.open-std.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20130402T133516-865@post.gmane.org>
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 11:36:13AM +0000, Peter Landmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i'm a university student in end phase and considering to write my master thesis
> about the md raid performance issues and to implement a prototype to solve it.
>
> What i have done and know:
> 1. I wrote a (internal) paper to measure raid performance with SSDs with freebsd
> software raid implementations and md raid under linux. I tested RAID 0 and RAID
> 5 with up to 6 Intel SSDs (X25-M G2, each 20k Write and 40k read OPS) and esp
> for RAID 5 it doesn't scaled. With my fio and general environment (bs 4k,
> iodepth 256, direct=1, randomwrite, spare capacity 87,5%, noop scheduler, latest
> mainline kernel from git, amd phenom II 1055T 2,8 GHz, 8GB ram) i got
> SSDs IOPS
> 3 14497.7
> 4 14005
> 5 17172.3
> 6 19779
>
> 2. AFAIK the main problem is that md uses only one write thread for each raid
> instance and their is a patch in work but still not availible.
>
> So my questions:
> 1. Is this problem solved (i know it isn't in mainline)? Is there still some
> work to do?
> 2. If not solved: Why isn't solved already (time? technical problem? priority?
> Not solvable?)
> 3. Is it the only problem? With my tests i captured detailed cpu stats and no
> cpu core was nearly at its capacity. So there are known other big reasons for
> perfomance issues?
> For example: 6 SSD randomwrite:
> CPU %usr %nice %sys %iowait %irq %soft %steal %guest %idle
> all 1,17 0,00 12,67 12,71 3,27 3,05 0,00 0,00 67,13
> 0 1,41 0,00 7,88 15,42 0,07 0,15 0,00 0,00 75,07
> 1 0,00 0,00 38,04 3,14 19,20 18,08 0,00 0,00 21,54
> 2 1,50 0,00 7,55 14,78 0,07 0,02 0,00 0,00 76,08
> 3 1,09 0,00 7,31 12,15 0,05 0,02 0,00 0,00 79,38
> 4 1,35 0,00 7,41 12,94 0,07 0,00 0,00 0,00 78,23
> 5 1,65 0,00 7,78 17,84 0,12 0,03 0,00 0,00 72,57
>
> 4. Is this (bringing the raid performance to or near the theoretically
> performance) a work that a man can archieve in less then 6 months without
> practical experience in kernel hacking (and i'm not a genuis :( )
>
> Thanks in advance for your responses,
> Peter Landmann
Are you only investigating SSDs? Ore are you also looking at ordinary rotating disks?
I think you should also look at RAID1 raid6 and raid10 near,offset and far.
Maybe there are bottlenecks other places in the system. There is more on performance and
bottlenecks on the wiki.
best regards
Keld
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-02 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-02 11:36 Solving the raid write performance problems Peter Landmann
2013-04-02 13:29 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2013-04-02 16:10 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-04-02 14:14 ` keld [this message]
2013-04-02 16:33 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130402141418.GA2941@www5.open-std.org \
--to=keld@keldix.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfrazt@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.