All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V5 0/6] USB: EHCI multiplatform for 3.10
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 19:14:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201304081914.30266.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130408164209.GA13694@kroah.com>

On Monday 08 April 2013, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 06:23:58PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> > 
> > Here are the EHCI patches that I think are good for inclusion in 3.10,
> > I hope you are willing to include them after the debacle over these
> > patches in 3.9.
> > 
> > The patches are all logically independent but sorted by priority,
> > so decide for yourself how many you want to take, starting at the
> > first one. The first six patches all have an Ack from Alan Stern
> > and from the respective ARM platform maintainers.
> 
> I don't see an ACK for the 6th patch from Alan, any reason for that?
> 
> I've applied the first 5 for now, if you want the 6th one applied,
> please resend.

Thanks a lot!

I had mentioned the fact that the last one is missing the ack in my
email, maybe not prominently enough when I wrote:

> > * The final patch is from me and still waiting for an Ack from Alan
> >   Stern, so please wait for his feedback before applying that one.

It would be nice to get that in, but it's not as important for 3.10 since
the only conflict between backends I expect is between Exynos and SPEAr.
SPEAr is not widely used for all I can tell, and whether Exynos actually
makes the multiplatform conversion is still an open question, since there
are a number of missing patches and we are about to close the window for
arm-soc patches as well. In 3.11, things will look quite different.

	Arnd

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	Manjunath Goudar <manjunath.goudar@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/6] USB: EHCI multiplatform for 3.10
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 19:14:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201304081914.30266.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130408164209.GA13694@kroah.com>

On Monday 08 April 2013, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 06:23:58PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> > 
> > Here are the EHCI patches that I think are good for inclusion in 3.10,
> > I hope you are willing to include them after the debacle over these
> > patches in 3.9.
> > 
> > The patches are all logically independent but sorted by priority,
> > so decide for yourself how many you want to take, starting at the
> > first one. The first six patches all have an Ack from Alan Stern
> > and from the respective ARM platform maintainers.
> 
> I don't see an ACK for the 6th patch from Alan, any reason for that?
> 
> I've applied the first 5 for now, if you want the 6th one applied,
> please resend.

Thanks a lot!

I had mentioned the fact that the last one is missing the ack in my
email, maybe not prominently enough when I wrote:

> > * The final patch is from me and still waiting for an Ack from Alan
> >   Stern, so please wait for his feedback before applying that one.

It would be nice to get that in, but it's not as important for 3.10 since
the only conflict between backends I expect is between Exynos and SPEAr.
SPEAr is not widely used for all I can tell, and whether Exynos actually
makes the multiplatform conversion is still an open question, since there
are a number of missing patches and we are about to close the window for
arm-soc patches as well. In 3.11, things will look quite different.

	Arnd

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-04-08 17:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-02 16:23 [PATCH V5 0/6] USB: EHCI multiplatform for 3.10 Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-02 16:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-02 16:23 ` [PATCH V5 1/6] USB: EHCI: make ehci-orion a separate driver Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-02 16:23   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-02 16:24 ` [PATCH V5 2/6] USB: EHCI: make ehci-spear " Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-02 16:24   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-02 16:24 ` [PATCH V5 3/6] USB: EHCI: make ehci-s5p " Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-02 16:24   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-02 16:24 ` [PATCH V5 4/6] USB: EHCI: make ehci-atmel " Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-02 16:24   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-02 16:24 ` [PATCH V5 5/6] USB: EHCI: make ehci-msm " Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-02 16:24   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-02 16:24 ` [PATCH V5 6/6] USB: OHCI: avoid conflicting platform drivers Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-02 16:24   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-17 20:57   ` Alan Stern
2013-04-17 20:57     ` Alan Stern
2013-04-08 16:42 ` [PATCH V5 0/6] USB: EHCI multiplatform for 3.10 Greg KH
2013-04-08 16:42   ` Greg KH
2013-04-08 16:48   ` Alan Stern
2013-04-08 16:48     ` Alan Stern
2013-04-08 17:14   ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2013-04-08 17:14     ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201304081914.30266.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.