From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>,
Christian Ruppert
<christian.ruppert-ux6zf3SgZrrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [5/7] i2c-designware: enable/disable the controller properly
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:39:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130409093903.GI21818@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130409092857.GE3624-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 11:28:57AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 12:28:36PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 11:09:14AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > >
> > > > +static void __i2c_dw_enable(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev, bool enable)
> > > > +{
> > > > + int timeout = 100;
> > > > +
> > > > + do {
> > > > + dw_writel(dev, enable, DW_IC_ENABLE);
> > > > + if ((dw_readl(dev, DW_IC_ENABLE_STATUS) & 1) == enable)
> > > > + return;
> > > > +
> > > > + usleep_range(25, 250);
> > >
> > > This would wait 25ms max. Is there a timeout value specified in the docs?
> >
> > The datasheet says something like:
> >
> > 1. Define a timer interval (t_i2c_poll) equal 10 times the highest
> > signaling period. For 400kHz this is 25us.
> >
> > 2. Define max timeout parameter, MAX_T_POLL_COUNT, such that if any
> > repeated operation exeeds this maximum, an error is reported.
> >
> > In this case I have:
> >
> > t_i2c_poll = 25 (to 250 us)
> > MAX_T_POLL_COUNT = 100
>
> Maybe worth a comment?
I'll add it in the next revision.
> Other than that, the series looks fine to me.
Thanks!
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
ben-linux@fluff.org, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Christian Ruppert <christian.ruppert@abilis.com>
Subject: Re: [5/7] i2c-designware: enable/disable the controller properly
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:39:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130409093903.GI21818@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130409092857.GE3624@the-dreams.de>
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 11:28:57AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 12:28:36PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 11:09:14AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > >
> > > > +static void __i2c_dw_enable(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev, bool enable)
> > > > +{
> > > > + int timeout = 100;
> > > > +
> > > > + do {
> > > > + dw_writel(dev, enable, DW_IC_ENABLE);
> > > > + if ((dw_readl(dev, DW_IC_ENABLE_STATUS) & 1) == enable)
> > > > + return;
> > > > +
> > > > + usleep_range(25, 250);
> > >
> > > This would wait 25ms max. Is there a timeout value specified in the docs?
> >
> > The datasheet says something like:
> >
> > 1. Define a timer interval (t_i2c_poll) equal 10 times the highest
> > signaling period. For 400kHz this is 25us.
> >
> > 2. Define max timeout parameter, MAX_T_POLL_COUNT, such that if any
> > repeated operation exeeds this maximum, an error is reported.
> >
> > In this case I have:
> >
> > t_i2c_poll = 25 (to 250 us)
> > MAX_T_POLL_COUNT = 100
>
> Maybe worth a comment?
I'll add it in the next revision.
> Other than that, the series looks fine to me.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-09 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-21 12:09 [PATCH 1/7] i2c-designware: move to managed functions (devm_*) Mika Westerberg
[not found] ` <1363867800-23861-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-21 12:09 ` [PATCH 2/7] i2c-designware-pci: use dev_err() instead of printk() Mika Westerberg
2013-03-21 12:09 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-04-08 11:04 ` [PATCH 1/7] i2c-designware: move to managed functions (devm_*) Mika Westerberg
2013-04-08 11:04 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-03-21 12:09 ` [PATCH 3/7] i2c-designware-pci: use managed functions pcim_* and devm_* Mika Westerberg
[not found] ` <1363867800-23861-3-git-send-email-mika.westerberg-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-09 9:03 ` [3/7] " Wolfram Sang
2013-04-09 9:03 ` Wolfram Sang
2013-03-21 12:09 ` [PATCH 4/7] i2c-designware: use dynamic adapter numbering on Lynxpoint Mika Westerberg
[not found] ` <1363867800-23861-4-git-send-email-mika.westerberg-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-09 9:06 ` [4/7] " Wolfram Sang
2013-04-09 9:06 ` Wolfram Sang
2013-04-09 9:23 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-04-09 9:29 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20130409092923.GF3624-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-09 9:37 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-04-09 9:37 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-03-21 12:09 ` [PATCH 5/7] i2c-designware: enable/disable the controller properly Mika Westerberg
2013-04-09 9:09 ` [5/7] " Wolfram Sang
2013-04-09 9:28 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-04-09 9:28 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20130409092857.GE3624-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-09 9:39 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2013-04-09 9:39 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-03-21 12:09 ` [PATCH 6/7] i2c-designware: use usleep_range() in the busy-loop Mika Westerberg
2013-03-21 12:10 ` [PATCH 7/7] i2c-designware: switch to use runtime PM autosuspend Mika Westerberg
2013-04-09 9:00 ` [1/7] i2c-designware: move to managed functions (devm_*) Wolfram Sang
2013-04-09 9:22 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-04-09 9:20 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130409093903.GI21818@intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg-vuqaysv1563yd54fqh9/ca@public.gmane.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=christian.ruppert-ux6zf3SgZrrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.