All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Cc: wim@iguana.be, manabian@gmail.com,
	linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: Revert the AT91RM9200_WATCHDOG dependency
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 06:33:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130410133351.GA7295@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365597382-15455-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 02:36:22PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Compiling the at91rm9200_wdt.c driver without at91rm9200
> support was leading to several errors:
> 
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `at91_wdt_close':
> at91_adc.c:(.text+0xc9fe4): undefined reference to `at91_st_base'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `at91_wdt_write':
> at91_adc.c:(.text+0xca004): undefined reference to `at91_st_base'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `at91wdt_shutdown':
> at91_adc.c:(.text+0xca01c): undefined reference to `at91_st_base'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `at91wdt_suspend':
> at91_adc.c:(.text+0xca038): undefined reference to `at91_st_base'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `at91_wdt_open':
> at91_adc.c:(.text+0xca0cc): undefined reference to `at91_st_base'
> drivers/built-in.o:at91_adc.c:(.text+0xca2c8): more undefined references to
> `at91_st_base' follow
> 
> So, reverting the modification of the "depends" Kconfig line
> introduced by patch a6a1bcd37 (watchdog: at91rm9200: add DT support)
> seems to be the good solution.
> 
Really ? Why ? I mean, this was supposed to be for at91rm9200, wasn't it ?
And why would want try to compile a watchdog for at91rm9200 without at91rm9200
support ?

I understand there is a problem, I just don't see how removing that line would
solgve it.

Guenter

> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/watchdog/Kconfig | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> index 9fcc70c..e89fc31 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ config ARM_SP805_WATCHDOG
>  
>  config AT91RM9200_WATCHDOG
>  	tristate "AT91RM9200 watchdog"
> -	depends on ARCH_AT91
> +	depends on ARCH_AT91RM9200
>  	help
>  	  Watchdog timer embedded into AT91RM9200 chips. This will reboot your
>  	  system when the timeout is reached.
> -- 
> 1.8.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: linux@roeck-us.net (Guenter Roeck)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] watchdog: Revert the AT91RM9200_WATCHDOG dependency
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 06:33:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130410133351.GA7295@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365597382-15455-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 02:36:22PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Compiling the at91rm9200_wdt.c driver without at91rm9200
> support was leading to several errors:
> 
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `at91_wdt_close':
> at91_adc.c:(.text+0xc9fe4): undefined reference to `at91_st_base'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `at91_wdt_write':
> at91_adc.c:(.text+0xca004): undefined reference to `at91_st_base'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `at91wdt_shutdown':
> at91_adc.c:(.text+0xca01c): undefined reference to `at91_st_base'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `at91wdt_suspend':
> at91_adc.c:(.text+0xca038): undefined reference to `at91_st_base'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `at91_wdt_open':
> at91_adc.c:(.text+0xca0cc): undefined reference to `at91_st_base'
> drivers/built-in.o:at91_adc.c:(.text+0xca2c8): more undefined references to
> `at91_st_base' follow
> 
> So, reverting the modification of the "depends" Kconfig line
> introduced by patch a6a1bcd37 (watchdog: at91rm9200: add DT support)
> seems to be the good solution.
> 
Really ? Why ? I mean, this was supposed to be for at91rm9200, wasn't it ?
And why would want try to compile a watchdog for at91rm9200 without at91rm9200
support ?

I understand there is a problem, I just don't see how removing that line would
solgve it.

Guenter

> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/watchdog/Kconfig | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> index 9fcc70c..e89fc31 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ config ARM_SP805_WATCHDOG
>  
>  config AT91RM9200_WATCHDOG
>  	tristate "AT91RM9200 watchdog"
> -	depends on ARCH_AT91
> +	depends on ARCH_AT91RM9200
>  	help
>  	  Watchdog timer embedded into AT91RM9200 chips. This will reboot your
>  	  system when the timeout is reached.
> -- 
> 1.8.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, wim@iguana.be,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	manabian@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: Revert the AT91RM9200_WATCHDOG dependency
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 06:33:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130410133351.GA7295@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365597382-15455-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 02:36:22PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Compiling the at91rm9200_wdt.c driver without at91rm9200
> support was leading to several errors:
> 
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `at91_wdt_close':
> at91_adc.c:(.text+0xc9fe4): undefined reference to `at91_st_base'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `at91_wdt_write':
> at91_adc.c:(.text+0xca004): undefined reference to `at91_st_base'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `at91wdt_shutdown':
> at91_adc.c:(.text+0xca01c): undefined reference to `at91_st_base'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `at91wdt_suspend':
> at91_adc.c:(.text+0xca038): undefined reference to `at91_st_base'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `at91_wdt_open':
> at91_adc.c:(.text+0xca0cc): undefined reference to `at91_st_base'
> drivers/built-in.o:at91_adc.c:(.text+0xca2c8): more undefined references to
> `at91_st_base' follow
> 
> So, reverting the modification of the "depends" Kconfig line
> introduced by patch a6a1bcd37 (watchdog: at91rm9200: add DT support)
> seems to be the good solution.
> 
Really ? Why ? I mean, this was supposed to be for at91rm9200, wasn't it ?
And why would want try to compile a watchdog for at91rm9200 without at91rm9200
support ?

I understand there is a problem, I just don't see how removing that line would
solgve it.

Guenter

> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/watchdog/Kconfig | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> index 9fcc70c..e89fc31 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ config ARM_SP805_WATCHDOG
>  
>  config AT91RM9200_WATCHDOG
>  	tristate "AT91RM9200 watchdog"
> -	depends on ARCH_AT91
> +	depends on ARCH_AT91RM9200
>  	help
>  	  Watchdog timer embedded into AT91RM9200 chips. This will reboot your
>  	  system when the timeout is reached.
> -- 
> 1.8.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-10 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-14 22:02 [PATCH] watchdog: at91rm9200: add DT support Joachim Eastwood
2013-02-14 22:02 ` Joachim Eastwood
2013-02-19 19:44 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2013-02-19 19:44   ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2013-04-09 14:04 ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-04-09 14:04   ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-04-09 20:27   ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2013-04-09 20:27     ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2013-04-10 12:36     ` [PATCH] watchdog: Revert the AT91RM9200_WATCHDOG dependency Nicolas Ferre
2013-04-10 12:36       ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-04-10 12:36       ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-04-10 13:33       ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2013-04-10 13:33         ` Guenter Roeck
2013-04-10 13:33         ` Guenter Roeck
2013-04-10 13:41         ` Guenter Roeck
2013-04-10 13:41           ` Guenter Roeck
2013-04-10 13:41           ` Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130410133351.GA7295@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manabian@gmail.com \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    --cc=wim@iguana.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.