From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/22] xfs: add CRC checking to dir2 leaf blocks
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:46:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130410174639.GG22182@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364965892-19623-14-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
Hi Dave,
Comments below. Basically just some nits about asserts, comments, variable
names, and looks like an off-by-one in xfs_dir3_leaf_log_header. I would like
to know your plan for xfs_da_root_split and xfs_dir3_leaf_check_int.
Nice find in xfs_dir2_block_to_leaf! That should be a separate patch.
Regards,
Ben
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 04:11:23PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> This addition follows the same pattern as the dir2 block CRCs.
> Seeing as both LEAF1 and LEAFN types need to changed at the same
> time, this is a pretty large amount of change. leaf block headers
> neeed to be abstracted away from the on-disk structures (struct
need
> xfs_dir3_icleaf_hdr), as do the base leaf entry locations.
>
> This header abstract allows the in-core header and leaf entry
> location to be passed around instead of the leaf block itself. This
> saves a lot of converting individual variables from on-disk format
> to host format where they are used, so there's a good chance that
> the compiler will be able to produce much more optimal code as it's
> not having to byteswap variables all over the place.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
...
> @@ -396,11 +397,18 @@ xfs_da_root_split(xfs_da_state_t *state, xfs_da_state_blk_t *blk1,
> size = (int)((char *)&oldroot->btree[be16_to_cpu(oldroot->hdr.count)] -
> (char *)oldroot);
> } else {
> - ASSERT(oldroot->hdr.info.magic == cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC));
> + struct xfs_dir3_icleaf_hdr leafhdr;
> + struct xfs_dir2_leaf_entry *ents;
> +
> leaf = (xfs_dir2_leaf_t *)oldroot;
> - size = (int)((char *)&leaf->ents[be16_to_cpu(leaf->hdr.count)] -
> - (char *)leaf);
> + xfs_dir3_leaf_hdr_from_disk(&leafhdr, leaf);
> + ents = xfs_dir3_leaf_ents_p(leaf);
> +
> + ASSERT(leafhdr.magic == XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC ||
> + leafhdr.magic == XFS_DIR3_LEAFN_MAGIC);
> + size = (int)((char *)&ents[leafhdr.count] - (char *)leaf);
> }
> + /* XXX: can't just copy CRC headers from one block to another */
What is your plan for resolving that?
> @@ -2281,10 +2299,17 @@ xfs_da_read_buf(
> XFS_TEST_ERROR((magic != XFS_DA_NODE_MAGIC) &&
> (magic != XFS_ATTR_LEAF_MAGIC) &&
> (magic != XFS_DIR2_LEAF1_MAGIC) &&
> + (magic != XFS_DIR3_LEAF1_MAGIC) &&
> (magic != XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC) &&
> + (magic != XFS_DIR3_LEAFN_MAGIC) &&
> (magic1 != XFS_DIR2_BLOCK_MAGIC) &&
> + (magic1 != XFS_DIR3_BLOCK_MAGIC) &&
Did this DIR3_BLOCK_MAGIC change sneak in from another patch?
> (magic1 != XFS_DIR2_DATA_MAGIC) &&
> - (free->hdr.magic != cpu_to_be32(XFS_DIR2_FREE_MAGIC)),
> + (magic1 != XFS_DIR3_DATA_MAGIC) &&
> + (free->hdr.magic !=
> + cpu_to_be32(XFS_DIR2_FREE_MAGIC)) &&
> + (free->hdr.magic !=
> + cpu_to_be32(XFS_DIR3_FREE_MAGIC)),
Do DIRx_DATA_MAGIC and DIRx_FREE_MAGIC belong in a different patch?
> /*
> * Get address of the bestcount field in the single-leaf block.
> */
> +static inline struct xfs_dir2_leaf_entry *
> +xfs_dir3_leaf_ents_p(struct xfs_dir2_leaf *lp)
> +{
> + if (lp->hdr.info.magic == cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR3_LEAF1_MAGIC) ||
> + lp->hdr.info.magic == cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR3_LEAFN_MAGIC)) {
> + struct xfs_dir3_leaf *lp3 = (struct xfs_dir3_leaf *)lp;
> + return lp3->__ents;
> + }
> + return lp->__ents;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Get address of the bestcount field in the single-leaf block.
> + */
I appreciate the addition of the comment.
> +bool
> +xfs_dir3_leaf_check_int(
> + struct xfs_mount *mp,
> + struct xfs_dir3_icleaf_hdr *hdr,
> + struct xfs_dir2_leaf *leaf)
> +{
> + struct xfs_dir2_leaf_entry *ents;
> + xfs_dir2_leaf_tail_t *ltp;
> + int stale;
> + int i;
> +
> + ents = xfs_dir3_leaf_ents_p(leaf);
> + ltp = xfs_dir2_leaf_tail_p(mp, leaf);
> +
> + /*
> + * This value is not restrictive enough.
> + * Should factor in the size of the bests table as well.
> + * We can deduce a value for that from di_size.
> + */
^^^^^
That should probably be marked with a TODO.
> +static bool
> +xfs_dir3_leaf_verify(
> struct xfs_buf *bp,
> - __be16 magic)
> + __uint16_t magic)
> +{
> + struct xfs_mount *mp = bp->b_target->bt_mount;
> + struct xfs_dir2_leaf *leaf = bp->b_addr;
> + struct xfs_dir3_icleaf_hdr leafhdr;
> +
> + ASSERT(magic == XFS_DIR2_LEAF1_MAGIC || magic == XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC);
Using v2 magics to choose between leaf1 and leafn is ok, but not as clear as
using a non-version-specific #define or enum might be for this purpose.
> @@ -169,27 +432,34 @@ xfs_dir2_block_to_leaf(
> /*
> * Initialize the leaf block, get a buffer for it.
> */
> - if ((error = xfs_dir2_leaf_init(args, ldb, &lbp, XFS_DIR2_LEAF1_MAGIC))) {
> + error = xfs_dir3_leaf_get_buf(args, ldb, &lbp, XFS_DIR2_LEAF1_MAGIC);
> + if (error)
> return error;
> - }
> - ASSERT(lbp != NULL);
> +
> leaf = lbp->b_addr;
> hdr = dbp->b_addr;
> xfs_dir3_data_check(dp, dbp);
> btp = xfs_dir2_block_tail_p(mp, hdr);
> blp = xfs_dir2_block_leaf_p(btp);
> bf = xfs_dir3_data_bestfree_p(hdr);
> + ents = xfs_dir3_leaf_ents_p(leaf);
> +
> /*
> * Set the counts in the leaf header.
> + *
> + * XXX: are these actually logged, or just gathered by chance?
Nice find. I'm not seeing where that header is being logged. Worth a separate
patch.
> void
> -xfs_dir2_leaf_log_header(
> +xfs_dir3_leaf_log_header(
> struct xfs_trans *tp,
> struct xfs_buf *bp)
> {
> - xfs_dir2_leaf_t *leaf; /* leaf structure */
> + struct xfs_dir2_leaf *leaf = bp->b_addr;
>
> - leaf = bp->b_addr;
> ASSERT(leaf->hdr.info.magic == cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR2_LEAF1_MAGIC) ||
> - leaf->hdr.info.magic == cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC));
> + leaf->hdr.info.magic == cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR3_LEAF1_MAGIC) ||
> + leaf->hdr.info.magic == cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC) ||
> + leaf->hdr.info.magic == cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR3_LEAFN_MAGIC));
> +
> xfs_trans_log_buf(tp, bp, (uint)((char *)&leaf->hdr - (char *)leaf),
> - (uint)(sizeof(leaf->hdr) - 1));
> + xfs_dir3_leaf_hdr_size(leaf));
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Should be xfs_dir3_leaf_hdr_size(leaf) - 1, I think.
> @@ -1958,36 +2171,40 @@ xfs_dir2_node_to_leaf(
> * Now see if the leafn and free data will fit in a leaf1.
> * If not, release the buffer and give up.
> */
> - if (xfs_dir2_leaf_size(&leaf->hdr, freehdr.nvalid) > mp->m_dirblksize) {
> + if (xfs_dir3_leaf_size(&leafhdr, freehdr.nvalid) > mp->m_dirblksize) {
> xfs_trans_brelse(tp, fbp);
> return 0;
> }
>
> /*
> * If the leaf has any stale entries in it, compress them out.
> - * The compact routine will log the header.
> */
> - if (be16_to_cpu(leaf->hdr.stale))
> - xfs_dir2_leaf_compact(args, lbp);
> - else
> - xfs_dir2_leaf_log_header(tp, lbp);
> + if (leafhdr.stale)
> + xfs_dir3_leaf_compact(args, &leafhdr, lbp);
>
> - lbp->b_ops = &xfs_dir2_leaf1_buf_ops;
> - leaf->hdr.info.magic = cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR2_LEAF1_MAGIC);
> + lbp->b_ops = &xfs_dir3_leaf1_buf_ops;
> + leafhdr.magic = (leafhdr.magic == XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC)
> + ? XFS_DIR2_LEAF1_MAGIC
> + : XFS_DIR3_LEAF1_MAGIC;
An assert might be nice here:
if (leafhdr.magic == XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC)
leafhdr.magic = XFS_DIR2_LEAF1_MAGIC;
else {
ASSERT(leafhdr.magic == XFS_DIR3_LEAFN_MAGIC);
leafhdr.magic = XFS_DIR3_LEAF1_MAGIC;
}
> static bool
> xfs_dir3_free_verify(
> struct xfs_buf *bp)
> @@ -360,11 +385,19 @@ xfs_dir2_leaf_to_node(
> xfs_dir2_free_log_bests(tp, fbp, 0, freehdr.nvalid - 1);
> xfs_dir2_free_log_header(tp, fbp);
>
> - /* convert the leaf to a leafnode */
> - leaf->hdr.info.magic = cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC);
> - lbp->b_ops = &xfs_dir2_leafn_buf_ops;
> - xfs_dir2_leaf_log_header(tp, lbp);
> - xfs_dir2_leafn_check(dp, lbp);
> + /*
> + * Converting the leaf to a leafnode is just a matter of changing the
> + * magic number and the ops. Do the change directly to the buffer as
> + * it's less work (and less code) than decoding the header to host
> + * format and back again.
> + */
> + if (leaf->hdr.info.magic == cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR2_LEAF1_MAGIC))
> + leaf->hdr.info.magic = cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC);
> + else
> + leaf->hdr.info.magic = cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR3_LEAFN_MAGIC);
Here too might be a good spot for an assert in the else.
> static void
> xfs_dir2_free_hdr_check(
> struct xfs_mount *mp,
> @@ -510,15 +520,18 @@ xfs_dir2_leafn_lasthash(
> struct xfs_buf *bp, /* leaf buffer */
> int *count) /* count of entries in leaf */
> {
> - xfs_dir2_leaf_t *leaf; /* leaf structure */
> + struct xfs_dir2_leaf *leaf = bp->b_addr;
> + struct xfs_dir2_leaf_entry *ents;
> + struct xfs_dir3_icleaf_hdr leafhdr;
> +
> + xfs_dir3_leaf_hdr_from_disk(&leafhdr, leaf);
> + ents = xfs_dir3_leaf_ents_p(leaf);
>
> - leaf = bp->b_addr;
> - ASSERT(leaf->hdr.info.magic == cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC));
Looks like this assert has gone missing. It was intentionally more specific
than the one in xfs_dir3_leaf_hdr_from_disk, right?
> @@ -547,16 +560,19 @@ xfs_dir2_leafn_lookup_for_addname(
> xfs_dir2_db_t newdb; /* new data block number */
> xfs_dir2_db_t newfdb; /* new free block number */
> xfs_trans_t *tp; /* transaction pointer */
> + struct xfs_dir2_leaf_entry *ents;
> + struct xfs_dir3_icleaf_hdr leafhdr;
>
> dp = args->dp;
> tp = args->trans;
> mp = dp->i_mount;
> leaf = bp->b_addr;
> - ASSERT(leaf->hdr.info.magic == cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC));
Here the assert is also missing, but it looks like it is handled below in
xfs_dir3_leaf_check. Maybe the above is similar.
> -#ifdef __KERNEL__
> - ASSERT(be16_to_cpu(leaf->hdr.count) > 0);
> -#endif
> - xfs_dir2_leafn_check(dp, bp);
> + xfs_dir3_leaf_hdr_from_disk(&leafhdr, leaf);
> + ents = xfs_dir3_leaf_ents_p(leaf);
> +
> + xfs_dir3_leaf_check(mp, bp);
...
> @@ -694,16 +710,19 @@ xfs_dir2_leafn_lookup_for_entry(
> xfs_dir2_db_t newdb; /* new data block number */
> xfs_trans_t *tp; /* transaction pointer */
> enum xfs_dacmp cmp; /* comparison result */
> + struct xfs_dir2_leaf_entry *ents;
> + struct xfs_dir3_icleaf_hdr leafhdr;
>
> dp = args->dp;
> tp = args->trans;
> mp = dp->i_mount;
> leaf = bp->b_addr;
> - ASSERT(leaf->hdr.info.magic == cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC));
Again. But you've also got xfs_dir3_leaf_check below, so maybe the first one is
the only issue.
> -#ifdef __KERNEL__
> - ASSERT(be16_to_cpu(leaf->hdr.count) > 0);
> -#endif
> - xfs_dir2_leafn_check(dp, bp);
> + xfs_dir3_leaf_hdr_from_disk(&leafhdr, leaf);
> + ents = xfs_dir3_leaf_ents_p(leaf);
> +
> + xfs_dir3_leaf_check(mp, bp);
...
> +xfs_dir3_leafn_moveents(
> + xfs_da_args_t *args, /* operation arguments */
> + struct xfs_buf *bp_s, /* source */
> + struct xfs_dir3_icleaf_hdr *shdr,
> + struct xfs_dir2_leaf_entry *sents,
> + int start_s,/* source leaf index */
> + struct xfs_buf *bp_d, /* destination */
> + struct xfs_dir3_icleaf_hdr *dhdr,
> + struct xfs_dir2_leaf_entry *dents,
> + int start_d,/* destination leaf index */
> + int count) /* count of leaves to copy */
> {
> - xfs_dir2_leaf_t *leaf_d; /* destination leaf structure */
> - xfs_dir2_leaf_t *leaf_s; /* source leaf structure */
> - int stale; /* count stale leaves copied */
> - xfs_trans_t *tp; /* transaction pointer */
> + int stale;
I agree
/* transaction pointer */
is a bit overkill but
/* count stale leaves copied */
does help a new reader of this code.
> @@ -922,21 +936,25 @@ xfs_dir2_leafn_moveents(
> */
> int /* sort order */
> xfs_dir2_leafn_order(
> - struct xfs_buf *leaf1_bp, /* leaf1 buffer */
> - struct xfs_buf *leaf2_bp) /* leaf2 buffer */
> + struct xfs_buf *leaf1_bp, /* leaf1 buffer */
> + struct xfs_buf *leaf2_bp) /* leaf2 buffer */
> {
> - xfs_dir2_leaf_t *leaf1; /* leaf1 structure */
> - xfs_dir2_leaf_t *leaf2; /* leaf2 structure */
> -
> - leaf1 = leaf1_bp->b_addr;
> - leaf2 = leaf2_bp->b_addr;
> - ASSERT(leaf1->hdr.info.magic == cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC));
> - ASSERT(leaf2->hdr.info.magic == cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC));
These asserts are more specific than those in xfs_dir3_leaf_hdr_from_disk so
they should probably stay and have dirv3 magic added.
> @@ -1153,6 +1193,8 @@ xfs_dir2_leafn_remove(
> int needscan; /* need to rescan data frees */
> xfs_trans_t *tp; /* transaction pointer */
> struct xfs_dir2_data_free *bf; /* bestfree table */
> + struct xfs_dir3_icleaf_hdr leafhdr;
> + struct xfs_dir2_leaf_entry *ents;
>
> trace_xfs_dir2_leafn_remove(args, index);
>
> @@ -1160,11 +1202,14 @@ xfs_dir2_leafn_remove(
> tp = args->trans;
> mp = dp->i_mount;
> leaf = bp->b_addr;
> - ASSERT(leaf->hdr.info.magic == cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC));
Another assert that is more specific than what it is replaced with, but you do
have a leafn check, so that's something.
> @@ -1366,6 +1413,8 @@ xfs_dir2_leafn_toosmall(
> xfs_da_blkinfo_t *info; /* leaf block header */
Looks like you can get rid of the info pointer now.
> @@ -1374,10 +1423,12 @@ xfs_dir2_leafn_toosmall(
> */
> blk = &state->path.blk[state->path.active - 1];
> info = blk->bp->b_addr;
> - ASSERT(info->magic == cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC));
Another assert that is more specific than it's replacement.
> @@ -1428,13 +1481,15 @@ xfs_dir2_leafn_toosmall(
> /*
> * Count bytes in the two blocks combined.
> */
> - leaf = (xfs_dir2_leaf_t *)info;
> - count = be16_to_cpu(leaf->hdr.count) - be16_to_cpu(leaf->hdr.stale);
> + count = leafhdr.count - leafhdr.stale;
> bytes = state->blocksize - (state->blocksize >> 2);
> +
> leaf = bp->b_addr;
> - ASSERT(leaf->hdr.info.magic == cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC));
> - count += be16_to_cpu(leaf->hdr.count) - be16_to_cpu(leaf->hdr.stale);
> - bytes -= count * (uint)sizeof(leaf->ents[0]);
^^^^^
I wonder why that (uint) was added.
> @@ -1481,34 +1536,52 @@ xfs_dir2_leafn_unbalance(
> xfs_da_args_t *args; /* operation arguments */
> xfs_dir2_leaf_t *drop_leaf; /* dead leaf structure */
> xfs_dir2_leaf_t *save_leaf; /* surviving leaf structure */
> + struct xfs_dir3_icleaf_hdr shdr;
> + struct xfs_dir3_icleaf_hdr dhdr;
> + struct xfs_dir2_leaf_entry *sents;
> + struct xfs_dir2_leaf_entry *dents;
As I read this I really had a hard time not thinking 'source' and 'dest'
instead of 'save' and 'drop'. This would be more readable as the latter.
>
> args = state->args;
> ASSERT(drop_blk->magic == XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC);
> ASSERT(save_blk->magic == XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC);
> drop_leaf = drop_blk->bp->b_addr;
> save_leaf = save_blk->bp->b_addr;
> - ASSERT(drop_leaf->hdr.info.magic == cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC));
> - ASSERT(save_leaf->hdr.info.magic == cpu_to_be16(XFS_DIR2_LEAFN_MAGIC));
More specific assert than its replacement.
> +
> + xfs_dir3_leaf_hdr_from_disk(&shdr, save_leaf);
> + xfs_dir3_leaf_hdr_from_disk(&dhdr, drop_leaf);
> + sents = xfs_dir3_leaf_ents_p(save_leaf);
> + dents = xfs_dir3_leaf_ents_p(drop_leaf);
> +
> /*
> * If there are any stale leaf entries, take this opportunity
> * to purge them.
> */
> - if (drop_leaf->hdr.stale)
> - xfs_dir2_leaf_compact(args, drop_blk->bp);
> - if (save_leaf->hdr.stale)
> - xfs_dir2_leaf_compact(args, save_blk->bp);
> + if (dhdr.stale)
> + xfs_dir3_leaf_compact(args, &dhdr, drop_blk->bp);
> + if (shdr.stale)
> + xfs_dir3_leaf_compact(args, &shdr, save_blk->bp);
> +
> /*
> * Move the entries from drop to the appropriate end of save.
> */
> - drop_blk->hashval = be32_to_cpu(drop_leaf->ents[be16_to_cpu(drop_leaf->hdr.count) - 1].hashval);
> + drop_blk->hashval = be32_to_cpu(dents[dhdr.count - 1].hashval);
> if (xfs_dir2_leafn_order(save_blk->bp, drop_blk->bp))
> - xfs_dir2_leafn_moveents(args, drop_blk->bp, 0, save_blk->bp, 0,
> - be16_to_cpu(drop_leaf->hdr.count));
> + xfs_dir3_leafn_moveents(args, drop_blk->bp, &dhdr, dents, 0,
> + save_blk->bp, &shdr, sents, 0,
> + dhdr.count);
> else
> - xfs_dir2_leafn_moveents(args, drop_blk->bp, 0, save_blk->bp,
> - be16_to_cpu(save_leaf->hdr.count), be16_to_cpu(drop_leaf->hdr.count));
> - save_blk->hashval = be32_to_cpu(save_leaf->ents[be16_to_cpu(save_leaf->hdr.count) - 1].hashval);
> - xfs_dir2_leafn_check(args->dp, save_blk->bp);
> + xfs_dir3_leafn_moveents(args, drop_blk->bp, &dhdr, dents, 0,
> + save_blk->bp, &shdr, sents,
> + shdr.count, dhdr.count);
> + save_blk->hashval = be32_to_cpu(sents[shdr.count - 1].hashval);
> +
> + /* log the changes made when moving the entries */
> + xfs_dir3_leaf_hdr_to_disk(save_leaf, &shdr);
> + xfs_dir3_leaf_hdr_to_disk(drop_leaf, &dhdr);
> + xfs_dir3_leaf_log_header(args->trans, save_blk->bp);
> + xfs_dir3_leaf_log_header(args->trans, drop_blk->bp);
> +
> + xfs_dir3_leaf_check(args->dp->i_mount, save_blk->bp);
xfs_dir3_leaf_check(args->dp->i_mount, drop_block->bp);
We used to check it in debug code. Might as well continue to do so.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-10 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-03 5:11 [PATCH 00/22] xfs: metadata CRCs, fourth version Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 01/22] xfs: increase hexdump output in xfs_corruption_error Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 02/22] xfs: add support for large btree blocks Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 03/22] xfs: add CRC checks to the AGF Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 04/22] xfs: add CRC checks to the AGFL Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 05/22] xfs: add CRC checks to the AGI Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 06/22] xfs: add CRC checks for quota blocks Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 07/22] xfs: add version 3 inode format with CRCs Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 08/22] xfs: split out symlink code into it's own file Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 09/22] xfs: add CRC checks to remote symlinks Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 10/22] xfs: add CRC checks to block format directory blocks Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 11/22] xfs: add CRC checking to dir2 free blocks Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 12/22] xfs: add CRC checking to dir2 data blocks Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 13/22] xfs: add CRC checking to dir2 leaf blocks Dave Chinner
2013-04-10 17:46 ` Ben Myers [this message]
2013-04-11 2:06 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-11 16:16 ` Ben Myers
2013-04-11 21:30 ` [PATCH V2 " Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 14/22] xfs: shortform directory offsets change for dir3 format Dave Chinner
2013-04-10 19:52 ` Ben Myers
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 15/22] xfs: add CRCs to dir2/da node blocks Dave Chinner
2013-04-22 18:55 ` Ben Myers
2013-04-24 0:33 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-24 8:58 ` [PATCH V2 " Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 16/22] xfs: add CRCs to attr leaf blocks Dave Chinner
2013-04-23 23:02 ` Ben Myers
2013-04-24 1:17 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-24 8:58 ` [PATCH V2 " Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 17/22] xfs: split remote attribute code out Dave Chinner
2013-04-24 19:13 ` Ben Myers
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 18/22] xfs: add CRC protection to remote attributes Dave Chinner
2013-04-25 18:56 ` Ben Myers
2013-04-30 7:20 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 19/22] xfs: add buffer types to directory and attribute buffers Dave Chinner
2013-04-26 19:09 ` Ben Myers
2013-04-30 7:28 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 20/22] xfs: buffer type overruns blf_flags field Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 21/22] xfs: add CRC checks to the superblock Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 22/22] xfs: implement extended feature masks Dave Chinner
2013-04-05 6:55 ` [PATCH 00/22] xfs: metadata CRCs, fourth version Dave Chinner
2013-04-05 7:00 ` [PATCH 23/22] xfs: add metadata CRC documentation Dave Chinner
2013-04-05 10:45 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2013-04-05 11:20 ` Dave Howorth
2013-04-07 23:06 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-05 11:35 ` Brian Foster
2013-04-07 23:08 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-09 6:49 ` [PATCH V2 " Dave Chinner
2013-04-09 7:33 ` [PATCH 24/22] xfs: Teach dquot recovery about CONFIG_XFS_QUOTA Dave Chinner
2013-04-27 20:44 ` Ben Myers
2013-04-30 6:18 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-27 20:42 ` [PATCH 00/22] xfs: metadata CRCs, fourth version Ben Myers
2013-04-28 23:25 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130410174639.GG22182@sgi.com \
--to=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.