From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/22] xfs: add CRCs to attr leaf blocks
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:02:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130423230245.GC29359@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364965892-19623-17-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
Hi Dave,
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 04:11:26PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Comments below.
> +static bool
> +xfs_attr3_leaf_verify(
> struct xfs_buf *bp)
> {
> struct xfs_mount *mp = bp->b_target->bt_mount;
> - struct xfs_attr_leaf_hdr *hdr = bp->b_addr;
> - int block_ok = 0;
> + struct xfs_attr_leafblock *leaf = bp->b_addr;
> + struct xfs_attr3_icleaf_hdr ichdr;
>
> - block_ok = hdr->info.magic == cpu_to_be16(XFS_ATTR_LEAF_MAGIC);
> - if (!block_ok) {
> - XFS_CORRUPTION_ERROR(__func__, XFS_ERRLEVEL_LOW, mp, hdr);
> - xfs_buf_ioerror(bp, EFSCORRUPTED);
> + xfs_attr3_leaf_hdr_from_disk(&ichdr, leaf);
> +
> + if (xfs_sb_version_hascrc(&mp->m_sb)) {
> + struct xfs_da3_node_hdr *hdr3 = bp->b_addr;
> +
> + if (ichdr.magic != XFS_ATTR3_LEAF_MAGIC)
> + return false;
> +
> + if (!uuid_equal(&hdr3->info.uuid, &mp->m_sb.sb_uuid))
> + return false;
> + if (be64_to_cpu(hdr3->info.blkno) != bp->b_bn)
> + return false;
> + } else {
> + if (ichdr.magic != XFS_ATTR_LEAF_MAGIC)
> + return false;
> }
> + if (ichdr.count == 0)
> + return false;
> +
> + /* XXX: need to range check rest of attr header values */
> + /* XXX: hash order check? */
Seems reasonable for debug code. Is that coming along in a subsequent patch?
> int
> -xfs_attr_leaf_to_shortform(
> - struct xfs_buf *bp,
> - xfs_da_args_t *args,
> - int forkoff)
> +xfs_attr3_leaf_to_shortform(
> + struct xfs_buf *bp,
> + struct xfs_da_args *args,
> + int forkoff)
> {
> - xfs_attr_leafblock_t *leaf;
> - xfs_attr_leaf_entry_t *entry;
> - xfs_attr_leaf_name_local_t *name_loc;
> - xfs_da_args_t nargs;
> - xfs_inode_t *dp;
> - char *tmpbuffer;
> - int error, i;
> + struct xfs_attr_leafblock *leaf;
> + struct xfs_attr3_icleaf_hdr ichdr;
> + struct xfs_attr_leaf_entry *entry;
> + struct xfs_attr_leaf_name_local *name_loc;
> + struct xfs_da_args nargs;
> + struct xfs_inode *dp = args->dp;
> + char *tmpbuffer;
> + int error;
> + int i;
>
> trace_xfs_attr_leaf_to_sf(args);
>
> - dp = args->dp;
> tmpbuffer = kmem_alloc(XFS_LBSIZE(dp->i_mount), KM_SLEEP);
> - ASSERT(tmpbuffer != NULL);
> + if (!tmpbuffer)
> + return ENOMEM;
>
> - ASSERT(bp != NULL);
> memcpy(tmpbuffer, bp->b_addr, XFS_LBSIZE(dp->i_mount));
> +
> leaf = (xfs_attr_leafblock_t *)tmpbuffer;
> - ASSERT(leaf->hdr.info.magic == cpu_to_be16(XFS_ATTR_LEAF_MAGIC));
> + xfs_attr3_leaf_hdr_from_disk(&ichdr, leaf);
> + entry = xfs_attr3_leaf_entryp(leaf);
> +
> + /* XXX (dgc): buffer is about to be marked stale - why zero it? */
> memset(bp->b_addr, 0, XFS_LBSIZE(dp->i_mount));
Good point. Why do we need a temporary buffer here? It seems like we could
keep the leaf around long enough to copy from it directly into shortform.
> int
> -xfs_attr_leaf_to_node(xfs_da_args_t *args)
> +xfs_attr3_leaf_to_node(
> + struct xfs_da_args *args)
> {
> - xfs_attr_leafblock_t *leaf;
> - xfs_da_intnode_t *node;
> - xfs_inode_t *dp;
> - struct xfs_buf *bp1, *bp2;
> - xfs_dablk_t blkno;
> - int error;
> + struct xfs_attr_leafblock *leaf;
> + struct xfs_attr3_icleaf_hdr icleafhdr;
> + struct xfs_attr_leaf_entry *entries;
> struct xfs_da_node_entry *btree;
> + struct xfs_da3_icnode_hdr icnodehdr;
> + struct xfs_da_intnode *node;
> + struct xfs_inode *dp = args->dp;
> + struct xfs_mount *mp = dp->i_mount;
> + struct xfs_buf *bp1 = NULL;
> + struct xfs_buf *bp2 = NULL;
> + xfs_dablk_t blkno;
> + int error;
>
> trace_xfs_attr_leaf_to_node(args);
>
> - dp = args->dp;
> - bp1 = bp2 = NULL;
> error = xfs_da_grow_inode(args, &blkno);
> if (error)
> goto out;
> - error = xfs_attr_leaf_read(args->trans, args->dp, 0, -1, &bp1);
> + error = xfs_attr3_leaf_read(args->trans, dp, 0, -1, &bp1);
> if (error)
> goto out;
>
> - bp2 = NULL;
> - error = xfs_da_get_buf(args->trans, args->dp, blkno, -1, &bp2,
> - XFS_ATTR_FORK);
> + error = xfs_da_get_buf(args->trans, dp, blkno, -1, &bp2, XFS_ATTR_FORK);
> if (error)
> goto out;
> +
> + /* copy leaf to new buffer, update identifiers */
> bp2->b_ops = bp1->b_ops;
> - memcpy(bp2->b_addr, bp1->b_addr, XFS_LBSIZE(dp->i_mount));
> - bp1 = NULL;
> - xfs_trans_log_buf(args->trans, bp2, 0, XFS_LBSIZE(dp->i_mount) - 1);
> + memcpy(bp2->b_addr, bp1->b_addr, XFS_LBSIZE(mp));
> + if (xfs_sb_version_hascrc(&mp->m_sb)) {
> + struct xfs_da3_blkinfo *hdr3 = bp2->b_addr;
> + hdr3->blkno = cpu_to_be64(bp2->b_bn);
Ok, so the memcpy above got uuid, ino, etc, and we only need to update blkno.
> @@ -963,52 +1120,62 @@ out:
> * or a leaf in a node attribute list.
> */
> STATIC int
> -xfs_attr_leaf_create(
> - xfs_da_args_t *args,
> - xfs_dablk_t blkno,
> - struct xfs_buf **bpp)
> +xfs_attr3_leaf_create(
> + struct xfs_da_args *args,
> + xfs_dablk_t blkno,
> + struct xfs_buf **bpp)
> {
> - xfs_attr_leafblock_t *leaf;
> - xfs_attr_leaf_hdr_t *hdr;
> - xfs_inode_t *dp;
> - struct xfs_buf *bp;
> - int error;
> + struct xfs_attr_leafblock *leaf;
> + struct xfs_attr3_icleaf_hdr ichdr;
> + struct xfs_inode *dp = args->dp;
> + struct xfs_mount *mp = dp->i_mount;
> + struct xfs_buf *bp;
> + int error;
>
> trace_xfs_attr_leaf_create(args);
>
> - dp = args->dp;
> - ASSERT(dp != NULL);
> error = xfs_da_get_buf(args->trans, args->dp, blkno, -1, &bp,
> XFS_ATTR_FORK);
> if (error)
> - return(error);
> - bp->b_ops = &xfs_attr_leaf_buf_ops;
> + return error;
> + bp->b_ops = &xfs_attr3_leaf_buf_ops;
> leaf = bp->b_addr;
> - memset((char *)leaf, 0, XFS_LBSIZE(dp->i_mount));
> - hdr = &leaf->hdr;
> - hdr->info.magic = cpu_to_be16(XFS_ATTR_LEAF_MAGIC);
> - hdr->firstused = cpu_to_be16(XFS_LBSIZE(dp->i_mount));
> - if (!hdr->firstused) {
> - hdr->firstused = cpu_to_be16(
> - XFS_LBSIZE(dp->i_mount) - XFS_ATTR_LEAF_NAME_ALIGN);
> - }
Saw this several times in review. I don't understand why that code would be
there, given that we just set firstused to be XFS_LBSIZE, the blocksize of the
filesystem. It's dead code now, so it's fine to remove... There must be some
history there. Any idea?
> @@ -1113,82 +1279,90 @@ xfs_attr_leaf_add(
> * and we don't have enough freespace, then compaction will do us
> * no good and we should just give up.
> */
> - if (!hdr->holes && (sum < entsize))
> - return(XFS_ERROR(ENOSPC));
> + if (!ichdr.holes && sum < entsize)
> + return XFS_ERROR(ENOSPC);
>
> /*
> * Compact the entries to coalesce free space.
> * This may change the hdr->count via dropping INCOMPLETE entries.
> */
> - xfs_attr_leaf_compact(args, bp);
> + xfs_attr3_leaf_compact(args, &ichdr, bp);
>
> /*
> * After compaction, the block is guaranteed to have only one
> * free region, in freemap[0]. If it is not big enough, give up.
> */
> - if (be16_to_cpu(hdr->freemap[0].size)
> - < (entsize + sizeof(xfs_attr_leaf_entry_t)))
> - return(XFS_ERROR(ENOSPC));
> + if (ichdr.freemap[0].size < (entsize + sizeof(xfs_attr_leaf_entry_t))) {
> + tmp = ENOSPC;
> + goto out_log_hdr;
That represents a change in behavior that I'm not sure about... Before if we
had ENOSPC here we would simply return and xfs_addr3_leaf_add_work would not
have a chance to log the header. Now...
> + }
> +
> + tmp = xfs_attr3_leaf_add_work(bp, &ichdr, args, 0);
>
> - return(xfs_attr_leaf_add_work(bp, args, 0));
> +out_log_hdr:
> + xfs_attr3_leaf_hdr_to_disk(leaf, &ichdr);
> + xfs_trans_log_buf(args->trans, bp,
> + XFS_DA_LOGRANGE(leaf, &leaf->hdr,
> + xfs_attr3_leaf_hdr_size(leaf)));
We're logging the header here instead of in xfs_attr_leaf_add_work
> + return tmp;
> }
and then returning. I think this would be better with a second goto so that we
don't log the header in keeping with the old behavior.
> @@ -1232,44 +1406,41 @@ xfs_attr_leaf_add_work(
> args->rmtblkcnt = XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, args->valuelen);
> }
> xfs_trans_log_buf(args->trans, bp,
> - XFS_DA_LOGRANGE(leaf, xfs_attr_leaf_name(leaf, args->index),
> + XFS_DA_LOGRANGE(leaf, xfs_attr3_leaf_name(leaf, args->index),
> xfs_attr_leaf_entsize(leaf, args->index)));
>
> /*
> * Update the control info for this leaf node
> */
> - if (be16_to_cpu(entry->nameidx) < be16_to_cpu(hdr->firstused)) {
> - /* both on-disk, don't endian-flip twice */
> - hdr->firstused = entry->nameidx;
> - }
> - ASSERT(be16_to_cpu(hdr->firstused) >=
> - ((be16_to_cpu(hdr->count) * sizeof(*entry)) + sizeof(*hdr)));
> - tmp = (be16_to_cpu(hdr->count)-1) * sizeof(xfs_attr_leaf_entry_t)
> - + sizeof(xfs_attr_leaf_hdr_t);
> - map = &hdr->freemap[0];
> + if (be16_to_cpu(entry->nameidx) < ichdr->firstused)
> + ichdr->firstused = be16_to_cpu(entry->nameidx);
> +
> + ASSERT(ichdr->firstused >= ichdr->count * sizeof(xfs_attr_leaf_entry_t)
> + + xfs_attr3_leaf_hdr_size(leaf));
> + tmp = (ichdr->count - 1) * sizeof(xfs_attr_leaf_entry_t)
> + + xfs_attr3_leaf_hdr_size(leaf);
> +
> for (i = 0; i < XFS_ATTR_LEAF_MAPSIZE; map++, i++) {
Looks like you can get rid of map.
> @@ -1286,34 +1457,69 @@ xfs_attr_leaf_compact(
> */
> leaf_s = (xfs_attr_leafblock_t *)tmpbuffer;
> leaf_d = bp->b_addr;
> - hdr_s = &leaf_s->hdr;
> - hdr_d = &leaf_d->hdr;
> - hdr_d->info = hdr_s->info; /* struct copy */
> - hdr_d->firstused = cpu_to_be16(XFS_LBSIZE(mp));
> - /* handle truncation gracefully */
> - if (!hdr_d->firstused) {
> - hdr_d->firstused = cpu_to_be16(
> - XFS_LBSIZE(mp) - XFS_ATTR_LEAF_NAME_ALIGN);
> - }
Another one. Weird.
> - hdr_d->usedbytes = 0;
> - hdr_d->count = 0;
> - hdr_d->holes = 0;
> - hdr_d->freemap[0].base = cpu_to_be16(sizeof(xfs_attr_leaf_hdr_t));
> - hdr_d->freemap[0].size = cpu_to_be16(be16_to_cpu(hdr_d->firstused) -
> - sizeof(xfs_attr_leaf_hdr_t));
> + ichdr_s = *ichdr_d; /* struct copy */
ichdr_s should be initialized from the copy we have in the temporary buffer
rather than from a struct copy of ichdr_d. I understand that what you have
here probably works fine, but it is not very obvious, or clear that it was
an intentional deviation from the struct copy up above.
> + ichdr_d->firstused = XFS_LBSIZE(mp);
> + ichdr_d->usedbytes = 0;
> + ichdr_d->count = 0;
> + ichdr_d->holes = 0;
> + ichdr_d->freemap[0].base = xfs_attr3_leaf_hdr_size(leaf_s);
> + ichdr_d->freemap[0].size = ichdr_d->firstused - ichdr_d->freemap[0].base;
>
> /*
> * Copy all entry's in the same (sorted) order,
> * but allocate name/value pairs packed and in sequence.
> */
> - xfs_attr_leaf_moveents(leaf_s, 0, leaf_d, 0,
> - be16_to_cpu(hdr_s->count), mp);
> + xfs_attr3_leaf_moveents(leaf_s, &ichdr_s, 0, leaf_d, ichdr_d, 0,
> + ichdr_s.count, mp);
> + /*
> + * this logs the entire buffer, but the caller must write the header
> + * back to the buffer when it is finished modifying it.
> + */
> xfs_trans_log_buf(trans, bp, 0, XFS_LBSIZE(mp) - 1);
Maybe better to just log the entries here, someday.
> @@ -2201,45 +2425,41 @@ xfs_attr_leaf_moveents(xfs_attr_leafblock_t *leaf_s, int start_s,
> /*
> * Set up environment.
> */
> - ASSERT(leaf_s->hdr.info.magic == cpu_to_be16(XFS_ATTR_LEAF_MAGIC));
> - ASSERT(leaf_d->hdr.info.magic == cpu_to_be16(XFS_ATTR_LEAF_MAGIC));
> - hdr_s = &leaf_s->hdr;
> - hdr_d = &leaf_d->hdr;
> - ASSERT((be16_to_cpu(hdr_s->count) > 0) &&
> - (be16_to_cpu(hdr_s->count) < (XFS_LBSIZE(mp)/8)));
> - ASSERT(be16_to_cpu(hdr_s->firstused) >=
> - ((be16_to_cpu(hdr_s->count)
> - * sizeof(*entry_s))+sizeof(*hdr_s)));
> - ASSERT(be16_to_cpu(hdr_d->count) < (XFS_LBSIZE(mp)/8));
> - ASSERT(be16_to_cpu(hdr_d->firstused) >=
> - ((be16_to_cpu(hdr_d->count)
> - * sizeof(*entry_d))+sizeof(*hdr_d)));
> -
> - ASSERT(start_s < be16_to_cpu(hdr_s->count));
> - ASSERT(start_d <= be16_to_cpu(hdr_d->count));
> - ASSERT(count <= be16_to_cpu(hdr_s->count));
> + ASSERT(ichdr_s->magic == XFS_ATTR_LEAF_MAGIC ||
> + ichdr_s->magic == XFS_ATTR3_LEAF_MAGIC);
This assert might be unnecessary due to the asserts in hdr_from_disk.
> @@ -2286,71 +2504,40 @@ xfs_attr_leaf_moveents(xfs_attr_leafblock_t *leaf_s, int start_s,
> /*
> * Zero out the entries we just copied.
> */
> - if (start_s == be16_to_cpu(hdr_s->count)) {
> + if (start_s == ichdr_s->count) {
> tmp = count * sizeof(xfs_attr_leaf_entry_t);
> - entry_s = &leaf_s->entries[start_s];
> + entry_s = &xfs_attr3_leaf_entryp(leaf_s)[start_s];
> ASSERT(((char *)entry_s + tmp) <=
> ((char *)leaf_s + XFS_LBSIZE(mp)));
> - memset((char *)entry_s, 0, tmp);
> + memset(entry_s, 0, tmp);
> } else {
> /*
> * Move the remaining entries down to fill the hole,
> * then zero the entries at the top.
> */
> - tmp = be16_to_cpu(hdr_s->count) - count;
> - tmp *= sizeof(xfs_attr_leaf_entry_t);
> - entry_s = &leaf_s->entries[start_s + count];
> - entry_d = &leaf_s->entries[start_s];
> - memmove((char *)entry_d, (char *)entry_s, tmp);
> + tmp = (ichdr_s->count - count) - sizeof(xfs_attr_leaf_entry_t);
*
Multiply.
> @@ -2379,20 +2567,21 @@ xfs_attr_leaf_lasthash(
> STATIC int
> xfs_attr_leaf_entsize(xfs_attr_leafblock_t *leaf, int index)
> {
> + struct xfs_attr_leaf_entry *entries;
> xfs_attr_leaf_name_local_t *name_loc;
> xfs_attr_leaf_name_remote_t *name_rmt;
> int size;
>
> - ASSERT(leaf->hdr.info.magic == cpu_to_be16(XFS_ATTR_LEAF_MAGIC));
I don't see a replacement for this assert.
> @@ -2786,38 +3003,44 @@ xfs_attr_root_inactive(xfs_trans_t **trans, xfs_inode_t *dp)
> */
> error = xfs_da3_node_read(*trans, dp, 0, -1, &bp, XFS_ATTR_FORK);
> if (error)
> - return(error);
> - blkno = XFS_BUF_ADDR(bp);
> + return error;
> + blkno = bp->b_bn;
I'm a little concerned about the switch from XFS_BUF_ADDR to bp->b_bn here, but
have not looked into it yet. If you have a quick explanation, that's great.
Otherwise I'll come back to it.
> +/*
> + * incore, neutral version of the attribute leaf header
> + */
> +struct xfs_attr3_icleaf_hdr {
> + __uint32_t forw;
> + __uint32_t back;
> + __uint16_t magic;
> + __uint16_t count;
> + __uint16_t usedbytes;
> + __uint16_t firstused;
> + __u8 holes;
> + struct {
> + __uint16_t base;
> + __uint16_t size;
> + } freemap[XFS_ATTR_LEAF_MAPSIZE];
Should that be an array of xfs_attr_leaf_map_t? No, that's ondisk format.
Nevermind then.
> @@ -1479,7 +1480,9 @@ xfs_da3_node_lookup_int(
> curr = blk->bp->b_addr;
> blk->magic = be16_to_cpu(curr->magic);
>
> - if (blk->magic == XFS_ATTR_LEAF_MAGIC) {
> + if (blk->magic == XFS_ATTR_LEAF_MAGIC ||
> + blk->magic == XFS_ATTR3_LEAF_MAGIC) {
> + blk->magic = XFS_ATTR_LEAF_MAGIC;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I'm still a little confused by these assignments. I understand you're
squashing them down from a comment, and that the correct magic is still in the
buffer... I need to find who is looking at blk->magic. Any hints?
That's about it for now.
Thanks,
Ben
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-23 23:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-03 5:11 [PATCH 00/22] xfs: metadata CRCs, fourth version Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 01/22] xfs: increase hexdump output in xfs_corruption_error Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 02/22] xfs: add support for large btree blocks Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 03/22] xfs: add CRC checks to the AGF Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 04/22] xfs: add CRC checks to the AGFL Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 05/22] xfs: add CRC checks to the AGI Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 06/22] xfs: add CRC checks for quota blocks Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 07/22] xfs: add version 3 inode format with CRCs Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 08/22] xfs: split out symlink code into it's own file Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 09/22] xfs: add CRC checks to remote symlinks Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 10/22] xfs: add CRC checks to block format directory blocks Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 11/22] xfs: add CRC checking to dir2 free blocks Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 12/22] xfs: add CRC checking to dir2 data blocks Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 13/22] xfs: add CRC checking to dir2 leaf blocks Dave Chinner
2013-04-10 17:46 ` Ben Myers
2013-04-11 2:06 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-11 16:16 ` Ben Myers
2013-04-11 21:30 ` [PATCH V2 " Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 14/22] xfs: shortform directory offsets change for dir3 format Dave Chinner
2013-04-10 19:52 ` Ben Myers
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 15/22] xfs: add CRCs to dir2/da node blocks Dave Chinner
2013-04-22 18:55 ` Ben Myers
2013-04-24 0:33 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-24 8:58 ` [PATCH V2 " Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 16/22] xfs: add CRCs to attr leaf blocks Dave Chinner
2013-04-23 23:02 ` Ben Myers [this message]
2013-04-24 1:17 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-24 8:58 ` [PATCH V2 " Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 17/22] xfs: split remote attribute code out Dave Chinner
2013-04-24 19:13 ` Ben Myers
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 18/22] xfs: add CRC protection to remote attributes Dave Chinner
2013-04-25 18:56 ` Ben Myers
2013-04-30 7:20 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 19/22] xfs: add buffer types to directory and attribute buffers Dave Chinner
2013-04-26 19:09 ` Ben Myers
2013-04-30 7:28 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 20/22] xfs: buffer type overruns blf_flags field Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 21/22] xfs: add CRC checks to the superblock Dave Chinner
2013-04-03 5:11 ` [PATCH 22/22] xfs: implement extended feature masks Dave Chinner
2013-04-05 6:55 ` [PATCH 00/22] xfs: metadata CRCs, fourth version Dave Chinner
2013-04-05 7:00 ` [PATCH 23/22] xfs: add metadata CRC documentation Dave Chinner
2013-04-05 10:45 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2013-04-05 11:20 ` Dave Howorth
2013-04-07 23:06 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-05 11:35 ` Brian Foster
2013-04-07 23:08 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-09 6:49 ` [PATCH V2 " Dave Chinner
2013-04-09 7:33 ` [PATCH 24/22] xfs: Teach dquot recovery about CONFIG_XFS_QUOTA Dave Chinner
2013-04-27 20:44 ` Ben Myers
2013-04-30 6:18 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-27 20:42 ` [PATCH 00/22] xfs: metadata CRCs, fourth version Ben Myers
2013-04-28 23:25 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130423230245.GC29359@sgi.com \
--to=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.