From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: Andrew Murray <Andrew.Murray@arm.com>
Cc: rob.herring@calxeda.com, siva.kallam@samsung.com,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, thierry.reding@avionic-design.de,
Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, paulus@samba.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
jg1.han@samsung.com, jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com,
thomas.abraham@linaro.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
arnd@arndb.de, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
kgene.kim@samsung.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, monstr@monstr.eu,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, suren.reddy@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] of/pci: Unify pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges from Microblaze and PowerPC
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:33:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130410233330.4e9479b0@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365578969-30966-2-git-send-email-Andrew.Murray@arm.com>
Dear Andrew Murray,
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:29:26 +0100, Andrew Murray wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/of_pci.h b/include/linux/of_pci.h
> index bb115de..6852481 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of_pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of_pci.h
> @@ -11,4 +11,7 @@ struct device_node;
> struct device_node *of_pci_find_child_device(struct device_node *parent,
> unsigned int devfn);
>
> +void pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges(struct pci_controller *hose,
> + struct device_node *dev, int primary);
> +
> #endif
In this file, 'struct pci_controller' is not defined anywhere, and not
in any header file that is included. So I get a warning at compile time
when <linux/of_pci.h> is included, but nothing has defined 'struct
pci_controller' beforehand. So I think this file should carry a change
like:
+struct pci_controller;
In my version of the patch I added it, see:
diff --git a/include/linux/of_pci.h b/include/linux/of_pci.h
index bb115de..e56182f 100644
--- a/include/linux/of_pci.h
+++ b/include/linux/of_pci.h
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
#include <linux/pci.h>
struct pci_dev;
+struct pci_controller;
struct of_irq;
int of_irq_map_pci(const struct pci_dev *pdev, struct of_irq *out_irq);
@@ -11,4 +12,7 @@ struct device_node;
struct device_node *of_pci_find_child_device(struct device_node *parent,
unsigned int devfn);
+void pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges(struct pci_controller *hose,
+ struct device_node *dev, int primary);
+
#endif
But otherwise, for PATCH 1/3 and 2/3,
Tested-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com (Thomas Petazzoni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/3] of/pci: Unify pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges from Microblaze and PowerPC
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:33:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130410233330.4e9479b0@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365578969-30966-2-git-send-email-Andrew.Murray@arm.com>
Dear Andrew Murray,
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:29:26 +0100, Andrew Murray wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/of_pci.h b/include/linux/of_pci.h
> index bb115de..6852481 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of_pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of_pci.h
> @@ -11,4 +11,7 @@ struct device_node;
> struct device_node *of_pci_find_child_device(struct device_node *parent,
> unsigned int devfn);
>
> +void pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges(struct pci_controller *hose,
> + struct device_node *dev, int primary);
> +
> #endif
In this file, 'struct pci_controller' is not defined anywhere, and not
in any header file that is included. So I get a warning at compile time
when <linux/of_pci.h> is included, but nothing has defined 'struct
pci_controller' beforehand. So I think this file should carry a change
like:
+struct pci_controller;
In my version of the patch I added it, see:
diff --git a/include/linux/of_pci.h b/include/linux/of_pci.h
index bb115de..e56182f 100644
--- a/include/linux/of_pci.h
+++ b/include/linux/of_pci.h
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
#include <linux/pci.h>
struct pci_dev;
+struct pci_controller;
struct of_irq;
int of_irq_map_pci(const struct pci_dev *pdev, struct of_irq *out_irq);
@@ -11,4 +12,7 @@ struct device_node;
struct device_node *of_pci_find_child_device(struct device_node *parent,
unsigned int devfn);
+void pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges(struct pci_controller *hose,
+ struct device_node *dev, int primary);
+
#endif
But otherwise, for PATCH 1/3 and 2/3,
Tested-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-10 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-10 7:29 [PATCH v5 0/3] of/pci: Provide common support for PCI DT parsing Andrew Murray
2013-04-10 7:29 ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-10 7:29 ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-10 7:29 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] of/pci: Unify pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges from Microblaze and PowerPC Andrew Murray
2013-04-10 7:29 ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-10 7:29 ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-10 13:13 ` Rob Herring
2013-04-10 13:13 ` Rob Herring
2013-04-10 21:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-04-10 21:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-04-11 16:57 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-11 16:57 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-11 16:57 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-11 12:03 ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-11 12:03 ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-11 12:03 ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-10 21:33 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2013-04-10 21:33 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-04-11 12:12 ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-11 12:12 ` Andrew Murray
[not found] ` <20130411121242.GB28981-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-11 15:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-04-11 15:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-04-10 7:29 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] of/pci: Provide support for parsing PCI DT ranges property Andrew Murray
2013-04-10 7:29 ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-10 7:29 ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-10 18:26 ` Rob Herring
2013-04-10 18:26 ` Rob Herring
2013-04-10 18:26 ` Rob Herring
2013-04-11 13:11 ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-11 13:11 ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-11 13:11 ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-10 7:29 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] of/pci: mips: convert to common of_pci_range_parser Andrew Murray
2013-04-10 7:29 ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-10 7:29 ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-10 18:28 ` Rob Herring
2013-04-10 18:28 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130410233330.4e9479b0@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=Andrew.Murray@arm.com \
--cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
--cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=siva.kallam@samsung.com \
--cc=suren.reddy@samsung.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@avionic-design.de \
--cc=thomas.abraham@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.