All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: christian.ruppert@abilis.com (Christian Ruppert)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] clk: Add device tree binding to clk-fixed-factor
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:12:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130412091234.GC29291@ab42.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5167CE33.9010403@free-electrons.com>

On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:04:51AM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> On 04/12/2013 08:54 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 06:26:07PM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> >> On 04/11/2013 11:19 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> >>> Hi Gregory,
> >>>
> >>> Since there doesn't seem to be anyone opposing this feature I just
> >>> checked your patch and after adding the CLK_OF_DECLARE macro in the end
> >>> it works well for us. Tell me if you would like to rebase and resubmit
> >>> your patch or if I should follow up on our own.
> >>
> >> I can rebase and resubmit my patch, it's pretty straightforward.
> >> The problem was the lack of user in the kernel. And by user I mean
> >> a driver using these functions. Usually a new function enter in the
> >> kernel only if there are users for it inside the kernel so if you plan
> >> to submit a driver using this piece of code, then I see no reason
> >> to not get it.
> > 
> > If you add the line
> > 
> > CLK_OF_DECLARE(fixed_factor_clk, "fixed-factor-clkdiv", 
> 
> Why did you add the div suffix?
> 
> There is nothing in the function which prevent to have "mul" greater than
> "div" and hence having a multiplicative factor.
> 
> I think that this suffix is misleading.

You are right, let's remove it.

> [...]

-- 
  Christian Ruppert              ,          <christian.ruppert@abilis.com>
                                /|
  Tel: +41/(0)22 816 19-42     //|                 3, Chemin du Pr?-Fleuri
                             _// | bilis Systems   CH-1228 Plan-les-Ouates

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christian Ruppert <christian.ruppert@abilis.com>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
	Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Add device tree binding to clk-fixed-factor
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:12:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130412091234.GC29291@ab42.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5167CE33.9010403@free-electrons.com>

On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:04:51AM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> On 04/12/2013 08:54 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 06:26:07PM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> >> On 04/11/2013 11:19 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> >>> Hi Gregory,
> >>>
> >>> Since there doesn't seem to be anyone opposing this feature I just
> >>> checked your patch and after adding the CLK_OF_DECLARE macro in the end
> >>> it works well for us. Tell me if you would like to rebase and resubmit
> >>> your patch or if I should follow up on our own.
> >>
> >> I can rebase and resubmit my patch, it's pretty straightforward.
> >> The problem was the lack of user in the kernel. And by user I mean
> >> a driver using these functions. Usually a new function enter in the
> >> kernel only if there are users for it inside the kernel so if you plan
> >> to submit a driver using this piece of code, then I see no reason
> >> to not get it.
> > 
> > If you add the line
> > 
> > CLK_OF_DECLARE(fixed_factor_clk, "fixed-factor-clkdiv", 
> 
> Why did you add the div suffix?
> 
> There is nothing in the function which prevent to have "mul" greater than
> "div" and hence having a multiplicative factor.
> 
> I think that this suffix is misleading.

You are right, let's remove it.

> [...]

-- 
  Christian Ruppert              ,          <christian.ruppert@abilis.com>
                                /|
  Tel: +41/(0)22 816 19-42     //|                 3, Chemin du Pré-Fleuri
                             _// | bilis Systems   CH-1228 Plan-les-Ouates

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christian Ruppert <christian.ruppert@abilis.com>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
	Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Add device tree binding to clk-fixed-factor
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:12:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130412091234.GC29291@ab42.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5167CE33.9010403@free-electrons.com>

On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:04:51AM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> On 04/12/2013 08:54 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 06:26:07PM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> >> On 04/11/2013 11:19 AM, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> >>> Hi Gregory,
> >>>
> >>> Since there doesn't seem to be anyone opposing this feature I just
> >>> checked your patch and after adding the CLK_OF_DECLARE macro in the end
> >>> it works well for us. Tell me if you would like to rebase and resubmit
> >>> your patch or if I should follow up on our own.
> >>
> >> I can rebase and resubmit my patch, it's pretty straightforward.
> >> The problem was the lack of user in the kernel. And by user I mean
> >> a driver using these functions. Usually a new function enter in the
> >> kernel only if there are users for it inside the kernel so if you plan
> >> to submit a driver using this piece of code, then I see no reason
> >> to not get it.
> > 
> > If you add the line
> > 
> > CLK_OF_DECLARE(fixed_factor_clk, "fixed-factor-clkdiv", 
> 
> Why did you add the div suffix?
> 
> There is nothing in the function which prevent to have "mul" greater than
> "div" and hence having a multiplicative factor.
> 
> I think that this suffix is misleading.

You are right, let's remove it.

> [...]

-- 
  Christian Ruppert              ,          <christian.ruppert@abilis.com>
                                /|
  Tel: +41/(0)22 816 19-42     //|                 3, Chemin du Pré-Fleuri
                             _// | bilis Systems   CH-1228 Plan-les-Ouates

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-12  9:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-10 15:40 [PATCH] clk: Add device tree binding to clk-fixed-factor Christian Ruppert
2013-04-10 15:40 ` Christian Ruppert
2013-04-10 15:40 ` Christian Ruppert
2013-04-10 15:56 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-04-10 15:56   ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-04-10 16:27   ` Christian Ruppert
2013-04-10 16:27     ` Christian Ruppert
2013-04-11  9:19     ` Christian Ruppert
2013-04-11  9:19       ` Christian Ruppert
2013-04-11 16:26       ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-04-11 16:26         ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-04-12  6:54         ` Christian Ruppert
2013-04-12  6:54           ` Christian Ruppert
2013-04-12  7:05           ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-04-12  7:05             ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-04-12  9:04           ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-04-12  9:04             ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-04-12  9:12             ` Christian Ruppert [this message]
2013-04-12  9:12               ` Christian Ruppert
2013-04-12  9:12               ` Christian Ruppert
2013-04-12  9:46               ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-04-12  9:46                 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-04-12 10:36                 ` [PATCH] ARC: [TB10x] Adapt device tree to new compatible string Christian Ruppert
2013-04-12 10:36                   ` Christian Ruppert
2013-04-12 10:36                   ` Christian Ruppert
2013-04-12 10:38                   ` Vineet Gupta
2013-04-12 10:38                     ` Vineet Gupta
2013-04-12 10:38                     ` Vineet Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130412091234.GC29291@ab42.lan \
    --to=christian.ruppert@abilis.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.