From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
device-mapper development
<dm-devel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Kent Overstreet
<koverstreet-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Amit Kale <akale-FZ1t8LVTR2ZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
ejt-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: bcache/dmcache/enhanceio bake-off
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:55:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130415135539.GA19977@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130413193319.GD8156-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On Sat, Apr 13 2013 at 3:33pm -0400,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13 2013 at 12:09pm -0400,
> Joe Thornber <thornber-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Darrick,
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:22:39AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Lately I've been having some fun playing with bcache, dmcache, and enhanceio.
> >
> > I pushed some tweaks to the mq policy today to my thin-dev tree. They
> > show some improvements to these fio based tests.
> >
> > In addition I've written a blog post trying to explain what's going on in dm-cache:
> > http://device-mapper.org/blog/2013/04/13/benchmarking-dm-cache-with-fio/
>
> Darrick,
>
> Joe has a few other dm-cache-target.c changes in his thin-dev branch
> that are required in order to realize the gains from his mq changes. I
> haven't yet isolated which changes are important but if I just use the
> 3.9-rc6's dm-cache-tagret.c with thin-dev's mq changes I cannot
> reproduce the improved performance Joe mentions in his blog post.
I've now isolated the dm-cache-target.c commit in Joe's thin-dev that is
important to have in conjunction with the mq changes (from commit 7362f43a):
commit f134e6382a534dd3622c3850e4824ae5929885d9
Author: Joe Thornber <ejt-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date: Wed Mar 27 14:46:57 2013 +0000
[dm-cache] Change the default migration_threshold to something more suitable.
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c b/drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c
index 8a4bcf3..f215307 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c
@@ -1948,7 +1948,7 @@ static sector_t calculate_discard_block_size(sector_t cache_block_size,
return discard_block_size;
}
-#define DEFAULT_MIGRATION_THRESHOLD (2048 * 100)
+#define DEFAULT_MIGRATION_THRESHOLD 2048
static int cache_create(struct cache_args *ca, struct cache **result)
{
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>,
Amit Kale <akale@stec-inc.com>,
ejt@redhat.com
Subject: Re: bcache/dmcache/enhanceio bake-off
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:55:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130415135539.GA19977@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130413193319.GD8156@redhat.com>
On Sat, Apr 13 2013 at 3:33pm -0400,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13 2013 at 12:09pm -0400,
> Joe Thornber <thornber@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Darrick,
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:22:39AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Lately I've been having some fun playing with bcache, dmcache, and enhanceio.
> >
> > I pushed some tweaks to the mq policy today to my thin-dev tree. They
> > show some improvements to these fio based tests.
> >
> > In addition I've written a blog post trying to explain what's going on in dm-cache:
> > http://device-mapper.org/blog/2013/04/13/benchmarking-dm-cache-with-fio/
>
> Darrick,
>
> Joe has a few other dm-cache-target.c changes in his thin-dev branch
> that are required in order to realize the gains from his mq changes. I
> haven't yet isolated which changes are important but if I just use the
> 3.9-rc6's dm-cache-tagret.c with thin-dev's mq changes I cannot
> reproduce the improved performance Joe mentions in his blog post.
I've now isolated the dm-cache-target.c commit in Joe's thin-dev that is
important to have in conjunction with the mq changes (from commit 7362f43a):
commit f134e6382a534dd3622c3850e4824ae5929885d9
Author: Joe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Mar 27 14:46:57 2013 +0000
[dm-cache] Change the default migration_threshold to something more suitable.
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c b/drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c
index 8a4bcf3..f215307 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c
@@ -1948,7 +1948,7 @@ static sector_t calculate_discard_block_size(sector_t cache_block_size,
return discard_block_size;
}
-#define DEFAULT_MIGRATION_THRESHOLD (2048 * 100)
+#define DEFAULT_MIGRATION_THRESHOLD 2048
static int cache_create(struct cache_args *ca, struct cache **result)
{
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-15 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-11 7:22 bcache/dmcache/enhanceio bake-off Darrick J. Wong
2013-04-11 7:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
[not found] ` <20130411072239.GD8910-yuuUpGxbzT9UbpRmUfBrXUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-13 16:09 ` [dm-devel] " Joe Thornber
2013-04-13 16:09 ` Joe Thornber
2013-04-13 19:33 ` Mike Snitzer
[not found] ` <20130413193319.GD8156-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-15 13:55 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2013-04-15 13:55 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-04-16 8:23 ` Joe Thornber
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-04-16 15:33 Mike Snitzer
2013-04-16 15:33 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130415135539.GA19977@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=akale-FZ1t8LVTR2ZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=darrick.wong-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dm-devel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ejt-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=koverstreet-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.