From: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v5 5/5] Make reboot_cpuid a kernel parameter.
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:48:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130417194836.GK3658@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <516EF9DE.6000707@zytor.com>
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:37:02PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 04/17/2013 11:43 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> > Moving the reboot=s<##> parameter for x86 to a kernel parameter
> > proper. I did not find any other arch that was specifying the
> > reboot cpu.
> >
> > I left a compatibility mode in there. The new parameter always
> > takes precedence. I also fixed up the current code to support
> > up to cpuid's up to the current max of 4096.
> >
>
> I still don't understand why you insist on introducing a new parameter
> rather than just supporting the existing, somewhat ugly, syntax: it is
> rare enough to need that the compatibility wins over the aestetics.
Did you see my response I sent this morning?
I would really like to try and remove the apparently unused reboot=
parameter from arm and unicore32 as well. Does anybody have a concern
with that? That should make documenting slightly easier.
> Furthermore that word "cpuid" that you keep using, I don't think it
> means what you think it means...
If we stayed with the core_param, would you prefer reboot_processor=###
over reboot_cpuid=###?
Robin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-17 19:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-17 18:43 [PATCH -v5 0/5] Shutdown from reboot_cpuid without stopping other cpus Robin Holt
2013-04-17 18:43 ` [PATCH -v5 1/5] CPU hotplug: Provide a generic helper to disable/enable CPU hotplug Robin Holt
2013-04-17 18:43 ` [PATCH -v5 2/5] Migrate shutdown/reboot to boot cpu Robin Holt
2013-04-17 18:43 ` [PATCH -v5 3/5] Move shutdown/reboot related functions to kernel/reboot.c Robin Holt
2013-04-17 18:43 ` [PATCH -v5 4/5] checkpatch.pl the new kernel/reboot.c file Robin Holt
2013-04-17 19:13 ` Robin Holt
2013-04-17 18:43 ` [PATCH -v5 5/5] Make reboot_cpuid a kernel parameter Robin Holt
2013-04-17 19:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-17 19:48 ` Robin Holt [this message]
2013-04-17 19:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-17 19:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-17 20:15 ` Robin Holt
2013-04-18 0:17 ` Robin Holt
2013-04-18 0:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-18 0:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-18 1:25 ` Robin Holt
2013-04-18 2:04 ` Robin Holt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130417194836.GK3658@sgi.com \
--to=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rja@sgi.com \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.