All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: "linux-mips@linux-mips.org" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	"jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com"
	<jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
	"linux@arm.linux.org.uk" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"siva.kallam@samsung.com" <siva.kallam@samsung.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" 
	<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"jg1.han@samsung.com" <jg1.han@samsung.com>,
	Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" 
	<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kgene.kim@samsung.com" <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
	"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"suren.reddy@samsung.com" <suren.reddy@samsung.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"monstr@monstr.eu" <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	"benh@kernel.crashing.org" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	"paulus@samba.org" <paulus@samba.org>,
	"thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com" 
	<thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
	"thierry.reding@avionic-design.de"
	<thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>,
	"thomas.abraham@linaro.org" <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>,
	"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"linus.walleij@linaro.org" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] of/pci: Provide support for parsing PCI DT ranges property
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:38:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130418153803.GA19373@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACxGe6u7yoecyTR2r-EzpcRxLuSw-p9KC7jA12wEQZs4of3vFA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 04:29:54PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 02:44:01PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:18:27 +0100, Andrew Murray <Andrew.Murray@arm.com> wrote:
> >> >             /* Act based on address space type */
> >> >             res = NULL;
> >> > -           switch ((pci_space >> 24) & 0x3) {
> >> > -           case 1:         /* PCI IO space */
> >> > +           res_type = range.flags & IORESOURCE_TYPE_BITS;
> >> > +           if (res_type == IORESOURCE_IO) {
> >>
> >> Why the change from switch() to an if/else if sequence?
> >
> > Russell King suggested this change - see
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2323941/
> 
> Umm, that isn't what that link shows. That link shows the patch
> already changing to an if/else if construct, and rmk is commenting on
> that.

Arh yes sorry about that. I can't find or remember any good reason why I
changed it from a switch to an if/else :\

Andrew Murray

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: "linux-mips@linux-mips.org" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	"jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com"
	<jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
	"linux@arm.linux.org.uk" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"siva.kallam@samsung.com" <siva.kallam@samsung.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
	<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"jg1.han@samsung.com" <jg1.han@samsung.com>,
	Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kgene.kim@samsung.com" <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
	"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhel>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] of/pci: Provide support for parsing PCI DT ranges property
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:38:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130418153803.GA19373@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACxGe6u7yoecyTR2r-EzpcRxLuSw-p9KC7jA12wEQZs4of3vFA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 04:29:54PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 02:44:01PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:18:27 +0100, Andrew Murray <Andrew.Murray@arm.com> wrote:
> >> >             /* Act based on address space type */
> >> >             res = NULL;
> >> > -           switch ((pci_space >> 24) & 0x3) {
> >> > -           case 1:         /* PCI IO space */
> >> > +           res_type = range.flags & IORESOURCE_TYPE_BITS;
> >> > +           if (res_type == IORESOURCE_IO) {
> >>
> >> Why the change from switch() to an if/else if sequence?
> >
> > Russell King suggested this change - see
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2323941/
> 
> Umm, that isn't what that link shows. That link shows the patch
> already changing to an if/else if construct, and rmk is commenting on
> that.

Arh yes sorry about that. I can't find or remember any good reason why I
changed it from a switch to an if/else :\

Andrew Murray

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: "linux-mips@linux-mips.org" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
	"siva.kallam@samsung.com" <siva.kallam@samsung.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linus.walleij@linaro.org" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	"thierry.reding@avionic-design.de"
	<thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>,
	Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
	"paulus@samba.org" <paulus@samba.org>,
	"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux@arm.linux.org.uk" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"jg1.han@samsung.com" <jg1.han@samsung.com>,
	"jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com"
	<jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
	"thomas.abraham@linaro.org" <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>,
	"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
	<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	"kgene.kim@samsung.com" <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
	"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com"
	<thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
	"monstr@monstr.eu" <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"suren.reddy@samsung.com" <suren.reddy@samsung.com>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] of/pci: Provide support for parsing PCI DT ranges property
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:38:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130418153803.GA19373@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACxGe6u7yoecyTR2r-EzpcRxLuSw-p9KC7jA12wEQZs4of3vFA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 04:29:54PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 02:44:01PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:18:27 +0100, Andrew Murray <Andrew.Murray@arm.com> wrote:
> >> >             /* Act based on address space type */
> >> >             res = NULL;
> >> > -           switch ((pci_space >> 24) & 0x3) {
> >> > -           case 1:         /* PCI IO space */
> >> > +           res_type = range.flags & IORESOURCE_TYPE_BITS;
> >> > +           if (res_type == IORESOURCE_IO) {
> >>
> >> Why the change from switch() to an if/else if sequence?
> >
> > Russell King suggested this change - see
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2323941/
> 
> Umm, that isn't what that link shows. That link shows the patch
> already changing to an if/else if construct, and rmk is commenting on
> that.

Arh yes sorry about that. I can't find or remember any good reason why I
changed it from a switch to an if/else :\

Andrew Murray

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: andrew.murray@arm.com (Andrew Murray)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 2/3] of/pci: Provide support for parsing PCI DT ranges property
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:38:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130418153803.GA19373@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACxGe6u7yoecyTR2r-EzpcRxLuSw-p9KC7jA12wEQZs4of3vFA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 04:29:54PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 02:44:01PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:18:27 +0100, Andrew Murray <Andrew.Murray@arm.com> wrote:
> >> >             /* Act based on address space type */
> >> >             res = NULL;
> >> > -           switch ((pci_space >> 24) & 0x3) {
> >> > -           case 1:         /* PCI IO space */
> >> > +           res_type = range.flags & IORESOURCE_TYPE_BITS;
> >> > +           if (res_type == IORESOURCE_IO) {
> >>
> >> Why the change from switch() to an if/else if sequence?
> >
> > Russell King suggested this change - see
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2323941/
> 
> Umm, that isn't what that link shows. That link shows the patch
> already changing to an if/else if construct, and rmk is commenting on
> that.

Arh yes sorry about that. I can't find or remember any good reason why I
changed it from a switch to an if/else :\

Andrew Murray

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-18 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-16 10:18 [PATCH v7 0/3] of/pci: Provide common support for PCI DT parsing Andrew Murray
2013-04-16 10:18 ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-16 10:18 ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-16 10:18 ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-16 10:18 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] of/pci: Unify pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges from Microblaze and PowerPC Andrew Murray
2013-04-16 10:18   ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-16 10:18   ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-16 10:30   ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-16 10:30     ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-16 10:30     ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-16 10:30     ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-17 16:00     ` Grant Likely
2013-04-17 16:00       ` Grant Likely
2013-04-17 16:00       ` Grant Likely
2013-04-17 16:00       ` Grant Likely
2013-04-17 16:10       ` Jason Cooper
2013-04-17 16:10         ` Jason Cooper
2013-04-17 16:10         ` Jason Cooper
2013-04-17 16:10         ` Jason Cooper
2013-04-17 16:17         ` Grant Likely
2013-04-17 16:17           ` Grant Likely
2013-04-17 16:17           ` Grant Likely
2013-04-17 16:17           ` Grant Likely
2013-04-17 16:22           ` Jason Cooper
2013-04-17 16:22             ` Jason Cooper
2013-04-17 16:22             ` Jason Cooper
2013-04-17 16:22             ` Jason Cooper
2013-04-18 12:48             ` Grant Likely
2013-04-18 12:48               ` Grant Likely
2013-04-18 12:48               ` Grant Likely
2013-04-18 12:48               ` Grant Likely
2013-04-18 13:06               ` Jason Cooper
2013-04-18 13:06                 ` Jason Cooper
2013-04-18 13:06                 ` Jason Cooper
2013-04-16 10:18 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] of/pci: Provide support for parsing PCI DT ranges property Andrew Murray
2013-04-16 10:18   ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-16 10:18   ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-18 13:44   ` Grant Likely
2013-04-18 13:44     ` Grant Likely
2013-04-18 13:44     ` Grant Likely
2013-04-18 13:44     ` Grant Likely
2013-04-18 13:44     ` Grant Likely
2013-04-18 14:24     ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-18 14:24       ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-18 14:24       ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-18 14:24       ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-18 15:29       ` Grant Likely
2013-04-18 15:29         ` Grant Likely
2013-04-18 15:29         ` Grant Likely
2013-04-18 15:29         ` Grant Likely
2013-04-18 15:38         ` Andrew Murray [this message]
2013-04-18 15:38           ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-18 15:38           ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-18 15:38           ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-22 10:57     ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-22 10:57       ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-22 10:57       ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-22 10:57       ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-16 10:18 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] of/pci: mips: convert to common of_pci_range_parser Andrew Murray
2013-04-16 10:18   ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-16 10:18   ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-17 15:42   ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-17 15:42     ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-17 15:42     ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-17 15:42     ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-18 12:59     ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-18 12:59       ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-18 12:59       ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-18 12:59       ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-18 13:09       ` Jason Cooper
2013-04-18 13:09         ` Jason Cooper
2013-04-18 13:09         ` Jason Cooper
2013-04-18 13:09         ` Jason Cooper
2013-04-19  7:19         ` Gabor Juhos
2013-04-19  7:19           ` Gabor Juhos
2013-04-19  7:19           ` Gabor Juhos
2013-04-19  7:19           ` Gabor Juhos
2013-04-20 22:33           ` Jason Cooper
2013-04-20 22:33             ` Jason Cooper
2013-04-20 22:33             ` Jason Cooper
2013-04-20 22:33             ` Jason Cooper
2013-04-21  7:27             ` Gabor Juhos
2013-04-21  7:27               ` Gabor Juhos
2013-04-21  7:27               ` Gabor Juhos
2013-04-21  7:27               ` Gabor Juhos
2013-04-22 10:49               ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-22 10:49                 ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-22 10:49                 ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-22 10:49                 ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-18 13:45   ` Grant Likely
2013-04-18 13:45     ` Grant Likely
2013-04-18 13:45     ` Grant Likely
2013-04-18 13:45     ` Grant Likely
2013-04-18 13:45     ` Grant Likely
2013-04-18 14:26     ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-18 14:26       ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-18 14:26       ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-18 14:26       ` Andrew Murray
2013-04-16 15:05 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] of/pci: Provide common support for PCI DT parsing Jason Cooper
2013-04-16 15:05   ` Jason Cooper
2013-04-16 15:05   ` Jason Cooper
2013-04-16 15:05   ` Jason Cooper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130418153803.GA19373@arm.com \
    --to=andrew.murray@arm.com \
    --cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
    --cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
    --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=siva.kallam@samsung.com \
    --cc=suren.reddy@samsung.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@avionic-design.de \
    --cc=thomas.abraham@linaro.org \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.