* [PATCH] pps: pps_kc_hardpps_lock can be static
@ 2013-04-20 9:54 Fengguang Wu
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2013-04-20 9:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rodolfo Giometti; +Cc: Alexander Gordeev, linux-kernel
drivers/pps/kc.c:37:1: sparse: symbol 'pps_kc_hardpps_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/pps/kc.c:39:19: sparse: symbol 'pps_kc_hardpps_dev' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/pps/kc.c:40:5: sparse: symbol 'pps_kc_hardpps_mode' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
drivers/pps/kc.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- linux-next.orig/drivers/pps/kc.c 2012-02-23 14:54:18.218537076 +0800
+++ linux-next/drivers/pps/kc.c 2013-04-20 17:20:18.866632025 +0800
@@ -34,10 +34,10 @@
*/
/* state variables to bind kernel consumer */
-DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pps_kc_hardpps_lock);
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pps_kc_hardpps_lock);
/* PPS API (RFC 2783): current source and mode for kernel consumer */
-struct pps_device *pps_kc_hardpps_dev; /* unique pointer to device */
-int pps_kc_hardpps_mode; /* mode bits for kernel consumer */
+static struct pps_device *pps_kc_hardpps_dev; /* unique pointer to device */
+static int pps_kc_hardpps_mode; /* mode bits for kernel consumer */
/* pps_kc_bind - control PPS kernel consumer binding
* @pps: the PPS source
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2013-04-20 9:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-04-20 9:54 [PATCH] pps: pps_kc_hardpps_lock can be static Fengguang Wu
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.