From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paul Chavent <Paul.Chavent@onera.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] PF_PACKET timestamping updates
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:07:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130423180715.GB2675@netboy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+FuTSdKPJ0wQUoAKGAh4t=cKs=GQx0tymd8a93GwFGjdB6oAg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 08:33:50AM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>
> Does this solve the issue you raised, Richard? The patch does not
> change which timestamp is written, so the ring will still fall back on
> software if a hardware timestamp is unavailable. It now reports this
> to the application in tp_status, however, so that it can act
> accordingly (worst case: ignore the timestamp).
Yes, this looks like a nice solution.
Thanks,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-23 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-23 10:39 [PATCH net-next 0/5] PF_PACKET timestamping updates Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-23 10:39 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] packet: tx timestamping on tpacket ring Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-23 10:39 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] packet: enable hardware " Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-23 12:13 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-23 10:39 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] packet: minor: convert status bits into shifting format Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-23 12:22 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-23 10:39 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] packet: if hw/sw ts enabled in rx/tx ring, report which ts we got Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-23 12:18 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-23 10:39 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] packet: doc: update timestamping part Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-23 12:20 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-23 12:33 ` [PATCH net-next 0/5] PF_PACKET timestamping updates Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-23 12:53 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-23 18:13 ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-23 18:07 ` Richard Cochran [this message]
2013-04-25 5:35 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130423180715.GB2675@netboy \
--to=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=Paul.Chavent@onera.fr \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.