From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
To: Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: DLOS
<davinci-linux-open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab
<mchehab-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Hans Verkuil
<hans.verkuil-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki
<s.nawrocki-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski
<g.liakhovetski-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>,
LMML <linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3] media: i2c: mt9p031: add OF support
Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 16:34:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201305031634.39129.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1367563919-2880-1-git-send-email-prabhakar.csengg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
On Friday 03 May 2013, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
>
> +static struct mt9p031_platform_data *
> +mt9p031_get_pdata(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np;
> + struct mt9p031_platform_data *pdata;
> +
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) || !client->dev.of_node)
> + return client->dev.platform_data;
> +
> + np = v4l2_of_get_next_endpoint(client->dev.of_node, NULL);
> + if (!np)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + pdata = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(struct mt9p031_platform_data),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pdata)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + pdata->reset = of_get_named_gpio(client->dev.of_node, "gpio-reset", 0);
> + of_property_read_u32(np, "input-clock-frequency", &pdata->ext_freq);
> + of_property_read_u32(np, "pixel-clock-frequency", &pdata->target_freq);
> +
> + return pdata;
> +}
Ok, good.
> @@ -955,7 +998,17 @@ static int mt9p031_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> mt9p031->pdata = pdata;
> mt9p031->output_control = MT9P031_OUTPUT_CONTROL_DEF;
> mt9p031->mode2 = MT9P031_READ_MODE_2_ROW_BLC;
> - mt9p031->model = did->driver_data;
> +
> + if (!client->dev.of_node) {
> + mt9p031->model = (enum mt9p031_model)did->driver_data;
> + } else {
> + const struct of_device_id *of_id;
> +
> + of_id = of_match_device(of_match_ptr(mt9p031_of_match),
> + &client->dev);
> + if (of_id)
> + mt9p031->model = (enum mt9p031_model)of_id->data;
> + }
> mt9p031->reset = -1;
Is this actually required? I thought the i2c core just compared the
part of the "compatible" value after the first comma to the string, so
"mt9p031->model = (enum mt9p031_model)did->driver_data" should work
in both cases.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Cc: LMML <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
DLOS <davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3] media: i2c: mt9p031: add OF support
Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 16:34:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201305031634.39129.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1367563919-2880-1-git-send-email-prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
On Friday 03 May 2013, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
>
> +static struct mt9p031_platform_data *
> +mt9p031_get_pdata(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np;
> + struct mt9p031_platform_data *pdata;
> +
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) || !client->dev.of_node)
> + return client->dev.platform_data;
> +
> + np = v4l2_of_get_next_endpoint(client->dev.of_node, NULL);
> + if (!np)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + pdata = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(struct mt9p031_platform_data),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pdata)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + pdata->reset = of_get_named_gpio(client->dev.of_node, "gpio-reset", 0);
> + of_property_read_u32(np, "input-clock-frequency", &pdata->ext_freq);
> + of_property_read_u32(np, "pixel-clock-frequency", &pdata->target_freq);
> +
> + return pdata;
> +}
Ok, good.
> @@ -955,7 +998,17 @@ static int mt9p031_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> mt9p031->pdata = pdata;
> mt9p031->output_control = MT9P031_OUTPUT_CONTROL_DEF;
> mt9p031->mode2 = MT9P031_READ_MODE_2_ROW_BLC;
> - mt9p031->model = did->driver_data;
> +
> + if (!client->dev.of_node) {
> + mt9p031->model = (enum mt9p031_model)did->driver_data;
> + } else {
> + const struct of_device_id *of_id;
> +
> + of_id = of_match_device(of_match_ptr(mt9p031_of_match),
> + &client->dev);
> + if (of_id)
> + mt9p031->model = (enum mt9p031_model)of_id->data;
> + }
> mt9p031->reset = -1;
Is this actually required? I thought the i2c core just compared the
part of the "compatible" value after the first comma to the string, so
"mt9p031->model = (enum mt9p031_model)did->driver_data" should work
in both cases.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-03 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-03 6:51 [PATCH RFC v3] media: i2c: mt9p031: add OF support Prabhakar Lad
[not found] ` <1367563919-2880-1-git-send-email-prabhakar.csengg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-03 14:34 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2013-05-03 14:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-06 14:59 ` Prabhakar Lad
2013-05-07 9:40 ` Prabhakar Lad
2013-05-08 2:02 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-05-08 4:49 ` Prabhakar Lad
2013-05-08 10:37 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-05-08 12:43 ` Prabhakar Lad
2013-05-13 10:46 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-05-13 22:59 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-05-14 5:13 ` Sascha Hauer
2013-05-08 2:01 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-05-08 4:47 ` Prabhakar Lad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201305031634.39129.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd-r2ngtmty4d4@public.gmane.org \
--cc=davinci-linux-open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=g.liakhovetski-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hans.verkuil-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mchehab-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=prabhakar.csengg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=s.hauer-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=s.nawrocki-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.