All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jake Edge <jake@lwn.net>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Bisected 3.9 regression for iwl4965 connection problem to 1672c0e3
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 09:29:10 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130506092910.080f96cd@chukar.edge2.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1367853859.8434.11.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net>

On Mon, 06 May 2013 17:24:19 +0200 Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 09:21 -0600, Jake Edge wrote:
> 
> > > Thanks for the report. Is the AP on a passive channel by any
> > > chance (5 GHz, or channels 12/13)?
> > 
> > No, from what I can see on my router, it is using channel 36 (5.180
> > GHz) for the SSID in question
> 
> So yes, that is a passive channel for the 4965 device :-)

oops, sorry :)  (obviously I don't know what a passive channel is :)

> > but Stanislaw seems to have pinpointed the issue.
> 
> Yeah that was a workaround, but I'm not sure we'd really want to do
> that. I'd rather see what really caused this issue. I have a feeling
> it's the passive-no-RX workaround, or lack thereof maybe? I need to
> look a bit closer.

Ok, I'm happy to test things out at this end ... change channels on the
router, build new kernels, etc.

thanks,

jake

-- 
Jake Edge - LWN - jake@lwn.net - http://lwn.net

      reply	other threads:[~2013-05-06 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-05 20:38 Bisected 3.9 regression for iwl4965 connection problem to 1672c0e3 Jake Edge
2013-05-06 12:38 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-06 14:37   ` Jake Edge
2013-05-06 15:30     ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-06 15:31       ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-06 15:44         ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-07  8:42           ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-07  8:46             ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2013-05-07 13:53             ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-07 15:35               ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-07 16:07                 ` [PATCH 3.10] iwl4965: workaround connection regression on passive channel Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-22 11:59                 ` Bisected 3.9 regression for iwl4965 connection problem to 1672c0e3 Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-24 20:28                   ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-06 15:11 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-06 15:21   ` Jake Edge
2013-05-06 15:24     ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-06 15:29       ` Jake Edge [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130506092910.080f96cd@chukar.edge2.net \
    --to=jake@lwn.net \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.