From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Jake Edge <jake@lwn.net>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Bisected 3.9 regression for iwl4965 connection problem to 1672c0e3
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 13:59:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130522115908.GA22547@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130507153525.GB1576@redhat.com>
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 05:35:25PM +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 03:53:30PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > I'm not sure if I like to add passive_no_rx to iwlegacy. Stopping queues
> > > and waiting for beacon looks sticky, what happen if beacon will not be
> > > received?
> >
> > Good question, do we get stuck? I was assuming we'd time out, but maybe
> > that's not the case?
>
> AFICT, we wake queues only if beacon arrives or mac80211 call drv_config
> with BSS_CHANGED_IDLE. I'm not sure if the latter prevent stuck.
It should prevent stuck. When we fail to auth, drv_config() with BSS_CHANGED_IDLE
is called via:
ieee80211_destroy_auth_data ->
ieee80211_vif_release_channel ->
__ieee80211_vif_release_channel ->
ieee80211_unassign_vif_chanctx ->
ieee80211_bss_info_change_notify
But there is need to have ->vif.chanctx_conf valid in
__ieee80211_vif_release_channel(), where is below condition:
conf = rcu_dereference_protected(sdata->vif.chanctx_conf,
lockdep_is_held(&local->chanctx_mtx));
if (!conf)
return;
I'm not sure if that always happen. Perhaps would be better to change
BSS_CHANGED_IDLE to BSS_CHANGED_BSSID, which is called directly from
ieee80211_destroy_auth_data() ?
Stanislaw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-22 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-05 20:38 Bisected 3.9 regression for iwl4965 connection problem to 1672c0e3 Jake Edge
2013-05-06 12:38 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-06 14:37 ` Jake Edge
2013-05-06 15:30 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-06 15:31 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-06 15:44 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-07 8:42 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-07 8:46 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2013-05-07 13:53 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-07 15:35 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-07 16:07 ` [PATCH 3.10] iwl4965: workaround connection regression on passive channel Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-22 11:59 ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2013-05-24 20:28 ` Bisected 3.9 regression for iwl4965 connection problem to 1672c0e3 Johannes Berg
2013-05-06 15:11 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-06 15:21 ` Jake Edge
2013-05-06 15:24 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-06 15:29 ` Jake Edge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130522115908.GA22547@redhat.com \
--to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=jake@lwn.net \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.