From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pm: Introduce __pm to mark power management code
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 13:30:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130509203007.GA31769@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1728768.gTkBc2iT1V@vostro.rjw.lan>
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 09:15:00PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, May 09, 2013 10:09:23 AM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > The following patch series introduces a marker for power management functions
> > and data. This this marker, #ifdef CONFIG_PM and #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > can be removed from most of the code. This ensures that the conditional code
> > still compiles but is not included in the object file.
> >
> > As a side effect, drivers declaring struct dev_pm_ops unconditionally
> > get a bit smaller if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not configured.
> >
> > The first patch in the series introduces the marker, the following
> > two patches introduce the marker in two drivers to demonstrate its use.
> >
> > The patch series depends on the "PM: Add pm_ops_ptr() macro" patch
> > submitted by Jingoo Han.
>
> What about CCing a PM core maintainer?
>
Actually, that was the idea. Somehow my send script got screwed up.
No idea what happened. Sorry for that.
Guenter
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 0/3] pm: Introduce __pm to mark power management code
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 20:30:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130509203007.GA31769@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1728768.gTkBc2iT1V@vostro.rjw.lan>
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 09:15:00PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, May 09, 2013 10:09:23 AM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > The following patch series introduces a marker for power management functions
> > and data. This this marker, #ifdef CONFIG_PM and #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > can be removed from most of the code. This ensures that the conditional code
> > still compiles but is not included in the object file.
> >
> > As a side effect, drivers declaring struct dev_pm_ops unconditionally
> > get a bit smaller if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not configured.
> >
> > The first patch in the series introduces the marker, the following
> > two patches introduce the marker in two drivers to demonstrate its use.
> >
> > The patch series depends on the "PM: Add pm_ops_ptr() macro" patch
> > submitted by Jingoo Han.
>
> What about CCing a PM core maintainer?
>
Actually, that was the idea. Somehow my send script got screwed up.
No idea what happened. Sorry for that.
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-09 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-09 17:09 [PATCH 0/3] pm: Introduce __pm to mark power management code Guenter Roeck
2013-05-09 17:09 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2013-05-09 17:38 ` Alan Stern
2013-05-09 17:38 ` Alan Stern
2013-05-09 17:38 ` [lm-sensors] " Alan Stern
2013-05-09 17:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-05-09 17:48 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2013-05-09 18:31 ` Alan Stern
2013-05-09 18:31 ` Alan Stern
2013-05-09 18:31 ` [lm-sensors] " Alan Stern
2013-05-09 19:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-09 19:12 ` [lm-sensors] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-09 19:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-09 19:15 ` [lm-sensors] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-09 20:30 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2013-05-09 20:30 ` Guenter Roeck
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-05-09 17:09 Guenter Roeck
2013-05-09 17:09 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2013-05-09 17:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] pm: Introduce __pm to mark power management functions and data Guenter Roeck
2013-05-09 17:09 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2013-05-09 17:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] hwmon: (tmp102) Convert to use __pm instead of #ifdef CONFIG_PM Guenter Roeck
2013-05-09 17:09 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2013-05-09 17:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] hwmon: (max6639) Convert to use __pm instead of #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP Guenter Roeck
2013-05-09 17:09 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2013-05-10 10:54 ` [PATCH 0/3] pm: Introduce __pm to mark power management code Pavel Machek
2013-05-10 10:54 ` [lm-sensors] " Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130509203007.GA31769@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.