From: mturquette@linaro.org (Mike Turquette)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] clk: abstract parent cache
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 13:01:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130513200123.10068.57183@quantum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366388904-13903-2-git-send-email-james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Quoting James Hogan (2013-04-19 09:28:22)
> Abstract access to the clock parent cache by defining
> __clk_get_parent_by_index(clk, index). This allows access to parent
> clocks from clock drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
> include/linux/clk-provider.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index ed87b24..79d5deb 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -415,6 +415,19 @@ struct clk *__clk_get_parent(struct clk *clk)
> return !clk ? NULL : clk->parent;
> }
>
> +struct clk *__clk_get_parent_by_index(struct clk *clk, u8 index)
This looks good, but in the next version can you remove the double
underscore? I'm getting rid of a lot of those double underscore
helpers now that the reentrancy patch is merged and I think this is a
reasonable top-level API for a clock provider to have.
Thanks,
Mike
> +{
> + if (!clk || index >= clk->num_parents)
> + return NULL;
> + else if (!clk->parents)
> + return __clk_lookup(clk->parent_names[index]);
> + else if (!clk->parents[index])
> + return clk->parents[index] =
> + __clk_lookup(clk->parent_names[index]);
> + else
> + return clk->parents[index];
> +}
> +
> unsigned int __clk_get_enable_count(struct clk *clk)
> {
> return !clk ? 0 : clk->enable_count;
> @@ -1150,13 +1163,7 @@ static struct clk *__clk_init_parent(struct clk *clk)
> kzalloc((sizeof(struct clk*) * clk->num_parents),
> GFP_KERNEL);
>
> - if (!clk->parents)
> - ret = __clk_lookup(clk->parent_names[index]);
> - else if (!clk->parents[index])
> - ret = clk->parents[index] =
> - __clk_lookup(clk->parent_names[index]);
> - else
> - ret = clk->parents[index];
> + ret = __clk_get_parent_by_index(clk, index);
>
> out:
> return ret;
> diff --git a/include/linux/clk-provider.h b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> index 7f197d7..4e0b634 100644
> --- a/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> +++ b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> @@ -347,6 +347,7 @@ const char *__clk_get_name(struct clk *clk);
> struct clk_hw *__clk_get_hw(struct clk *clk);
> u8 __clk_get_num_parents(struct clk *clk);
> struct clk *__clk_get_parent(struct clk *clk);
> +struct clk *__clk_get_parent_by_index(struct clk *clk, u8 index);
> unsigned int __clk_get_enable_count(struct clk *clk);
> unsigned int __clk_get_prepare_count(struct clk *clk);
> unsigned long __clk_get_rate(struct clk *clk);
> --
> 1.8.1.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
To: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] clk: abstract parent cache
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 13:01:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130513200123.10068.57183@quantum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366388904-13903-2-git-send-email-james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Quoting James Hogan (2013-04-19 09:28:22)
> Abstract access to the clock parent cache by defining
> __clk_get_parent_by_index(clk, index). This allows access to parent
> clocks from clock drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
> include/linux/clk-provider.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index ed87b24..79d5deb 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -415,6 +415,19 @@ struct clk *__clk_get_parent(struct clk *clk)
> return !clk ? NULL : clk->parent;
> }
>
> +struct clk *__clk_get_parent_by_index(struct clk *clk, u8 index)
This looks good, but in the next version can you remove the double
underscore? I'm getting rid of a lot of those double underscore
helpers now that the reentrancy patch is merged and I think this is a
reasonable top-level API for a clock provider to have.
Thanks,
Mike
> +{
> + if (!clk || index >= clk->num_parents)
> + return NULL;
> + else if (!clk->parents)
> + return __clk_lookup(clk->parent_names[index]);
> + else if (!clk->parents[index])
> + return clk->parents[index] =
> + __clk_lookup(clk->parent_names[index]);
> + else
> + return clk->parents[index];
> +}
> +
> unsigned int __clk_get_enable_count(struct clk *clk)
> {
> return !clk ? 0 : clk->enable_count;
> @@ -1150,13 +1163,7 @@ static struct clk *__clk_init_parent(struct clk *clk)
> kzalloc((sizeof(struct clk*) * clk->num_parents),
> GFP_KERNEL);
>
> - if (!clk->parents)
> - ret = __clk_lookup(clk->parent_names[index]);
> - else if (!clk->parents[index])
> - ret = clk->parents[index] =
> - __clk_lookup(clk->parent_names[index]);
> - else
> - ret = clk->parents[index];
> + ret = __clk_get_parent_by_index(clk, index);
>
> out:
> return ret;
> diff --git a/include/linux/clk-provider.h b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> index 7f197d7..4e0b634 100644
> --- a/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> +++ b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> @@ -347,6 +347,7 @@ const char *__clk_get_name(struct clk *clk);
> struct clk_hw *__clk_get_hw(struct clk *clk);
> u8 __clk_get_num_parents(struct clk *clk);
> struct clk *__clk_get_parent(struct clk *clk);
> +struct clk *__clk_get_parent_by_index(struct clk *clk, u8 index);
> unsigned int __clk_get_enable_count(struct clk *clk);
> unsigned int __clk_get_prepare_count(struct clk *clk);
> unsigned long __clk_get_rate(struct clk *clk);
> --
> 1.8.1.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-13 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-19 16:28 [PATCH v2 0/3] clk: implement remuxing during set_rate James Hogan
2013-04-19 16:28 ` James Hogan
2013-04-19 16:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] clk: abstract parent cache James Hogan
2013-04-19 16:28 ` James Hogan
2013-05-13 20:01 ` Mike Turquette [this message]
2013-05-13 20:01 ` Mike Turquette
2013-04-19 16:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] clk: add support for clock reparent on set_rate James Hogan
2013-04-19 16:28 ` James Hogan
2013-05-09 20:01 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-05-09 20:01 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-05-10 10:41 ` James Hogan
2013-05-10 10:41 ` James Hogan
2013-05-14 18:13 ` Mike Turquette
2013-05-14 18:13 ` Mike Turquette
2013-05-14 20:35 ` James Hogan
2013-05-14 20:35 ` James Hogan
2013-04-19 16:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] clk: clk-mux: implement remuxing " James Hogan
2013-04-19 16:28 ` James Hogan
2013-05-08 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] clk: implement remuxing during set_rate Stephen Boyd
2013-05-08 23:36 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-05-09 3:50 ` Saravana Kannan
2013-05-09 3:50 ` Saravana Kannan
2013-05-09 9:02 ` James Hogan
2013-05-09 9:02 ` James Hogan
2013-05-09 19:48 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-05-09 19:48 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-05-10 10:43 ` James Hogan
2013-05-10 10:43 ` James Hogan
2013-05-13 19:57 ` Mike Turquette
2013-05-13 19:57 ` Mike Turquette
2013-05-13 21:30 ` James Hogan
2013-05-13 21:30 ` James Hogan
2013-05-14 16:59 ` Mike Turquette
2013-05-14 21:01 ` James Hogan
2013-05-14 21:01 ` James Hogan
2013-05-14 22:15 ` Mike Turquette
2013-05-16 4:11 ` Saravana Kannan
2013-05-16 4:11 ` Saravana Kannan
2013-05-16 9:25 ` James Hogan
2013-05-16 9:25 ` James Hogan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130513200123.10068.57183@quantum \
--to=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.