Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] ARM: mmc: bcm281xx SDHCI driver

[Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>]

On Friday 10 May 2013, Christian Daudt wrote:
> +
> +struct sdhci_bcm_kona_cfg {
> +	unsigned int	max_freq;
> +	int		is_8bit;
> +	int		irq;
> +	int		cd_gpio;
> +	int		wp_gpio;
> +	int		non_removable;
> +};

I see no use for this structure to be separate: a lot of the fields are
duplicated in the sdhci_host, or should just get merged into
sdhci_bcm_kona_dev.

> +struct sdhci_bcm_kona_dev {
> +	struct sdhci_bcm_kona_cfg *cfg;
> +	struct device *dev;
> +	struct sdhci_host *host;
> +	struct clk *peri_clk;
> +	struct clk *sleep_clk;
> +};

The *dev and *host members in this structure are redundant, just
allocate it together with sdhci_host and use use container_of()
to get from the sdhci_host back it it.

> +static void sdhci_bcm_kona_sd_init(struct sdhci_host *host)
> +{
> +	unsigned int val;
> +
> +	/* enable the interrupt from the IP core */
> +	val = sdhci_readl(host, KONA_SDHOST_COREIMR);
> +	val |= KONA_SDHOST_IP;
> +	sdhci_writel(host, val, KONA_SDHOST_COREIMR);
> +
> +	/* Enable the AHB clock gating module to the host */
> +	val = sdhci_readl(host, KONA_SDHOST_CORECTRL);
> +	val |= KONA_SDHOST_EN;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Back-to-Back register write needs a delay of 1ms at bootup (min 10uS)
> +	 * Back-to-Back writes to same register needs delay when SD bus clock
> +	 * is very low w.r.t AHB clock, mainly during boot-time and during card
> +	 * insert-removal.
> +	 */
> +	mdelay(1);
> +	sdhci_writel(host, val, KONA_SDHOST_CORECTRL);
> +}

Why not use msleep() instead of mdelay() here?

> +static int sdhci_bcm_kona_sd_card_emulate(struct sdhci_host *host, int insert)
> +{
> +	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_priv = sdhci_priv(host);
> +	struct sdhci_bcm_kona_dev *kona_dev = pltfm_priv->priv;
> +	u32 val;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	/* this function can be called from various contexts including ISR */
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
> +	/* Ensure SD bus scanning to detect media change */
> +	host->mmc->rescan_disable = 0;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Back-to-Back register write needs a delay of min 10uS.
> +	 * Back-to-Back writes to same register needs delay when SD bus clock
> +	 * is very low w.r.t AHB clock, mainly during boot-time and during card
> +	 * insert-removal.
> +	 * We keep 20uS
> +	 */
> +	udelay(20);
> +	val = sdhci_readl(host, KONA_SDHOST_CORESTAT);

Does the delay have to be done with interrupts disabled? That is not particularly
nice.

I hope the hardware designers have been appropriately punished for the creating
such crap.
> +static void sdhci_bcm_kona_init_74_clocks(struct sdhci_host *host,
> +				u8 power_mode)
> +{
> +	if (power_mode == MMC_POWER_OFF)
> +		return;
> +	else
> +		mdelay(10);
> +}

This requires at the minimum a comment about why the mdelay is needed.
Maybe we can change the set_ios function so we never need to call it
in atomic context.

> +static struct sdhci_bcm_kona_cfg * __init sdhci_bcm_kona_parse_dt(
> +			struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct sdhci_bcm_kona_cfg *cfg;
> +	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> +	u32 temp;

fold this function into probe()

> +	if (!np)
> +		return NULL;

impossible

> +	cfg = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*cfg), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!cfg) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can't allocate platform cfg\n");
> +		return NULL;
> +	}

Not needed

> +static int __init sdhci_bcm_kona_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	const struct of_device_id *match;

constant, so not needed.

> +	struct sdhci_bcm_kona_cfg *kona_cfg = NULL;

No need to initialize this.

> +	const struct sdhci_pltfm_data *plat_data;

make it global.

> +	struct sdhci_bcm_kona_dev *kona_dev = NULL;

No need to initialize this.

> +	kona_dev = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*kona_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!kona_dev) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Can't allocate kona_dev\n");
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto err_pltfm_free;
> +	}

It is rather silly to have the base sdhci code allocate extra
memory for the platform drivers but then require an extra allocation.
Better change the sdhci_pltfm_init function to let you pass the extra
allocation size.

> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Broadcom");

No person?

	Arnd