From: vinod.koul@intel.com (Vinod Koul)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH -next v2] dmaengine: ste_dma40: fix error return code in d40_probe()
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:24:43 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130612095443.GU4107@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZhK6TUAC132vzcaLKqdMTwPma+ZhKG5Y+AUvekNpz6EQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 11:14:16AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:41:38AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> >> >
> >> > In many of the error handling case, the return value 'ret' not set
> >> > and 0 will be return from d40_probe() even if error, but we should
> >> > return a negative error code instead in those error handling case.
> >> > This patch fixed them, and also removed useless variable 'err'.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> >> > ---
> >> > v1 -> v2: rebased on linux-next.git
> >>
> >> I've tentatively applied this to my dma40 branch, waiting for Vinod
> >> to ACK it.
> > I though you wanted me to apply this :)
> >
> > Nevertheless, Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
> >
> > Can you CC stable too, pls.
>
> Hm I'm not sending any DMA40 stuff for stable, sorry ...
> if you want it to go into stable you'd better pick this
> (the v3 version) into the DMA tree.
okay
>
> Let me know how you want it, I've removed it from my
> dma40 branch for the time being.
Have you removed, Also I see a v3 of this, do you want to ack that before I
apply
--
~Vinod
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@gmail.com>,
Srinidhi KASAGAR <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com>,
Dan Williams <djbw@fb.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2] dmaengine: ste_dma40: fix error return code in d40_probe()
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:24:43 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130612095443.GU4107@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZhK6TUAC132vzcaLKqdMTwPma+ZhKG5Y+AUvekNpz6EQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 11:14:16AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:41:38AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> >> >
> >> > In many of the error handling case, the return value 'ret' not set
> >> > and 0 will be return from d40_probe() even if error, but we should
> >> > return a negative error code instead in those error handling case.
> >> > This patch fixed them, and also removed useless variable 'err'.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> >> > ---
> >> > v1 -> v2: rebased on linux-next.git
> >>
> >> I've tentatively applied this to my dma40 branch, waiting for Vinod
> >> to ACK it.
> > I though you wanted me to apply this :)
> >
> > Nevertheless, Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
> >
> > Can you CC stable too, pls.
>
> Hm I'm not sending any DMA40 stuff for stable, sorry ...
> if you want it to go into stable you'd better pick this
> (the v3 version) into the DMA tree.
okay
>
> Let me know how you want it, I've removed it from my
> dma40 branch for the time being.
Have you removed, Also I see a v3 of this, do you want to ack that before I
apply
--
~Vinod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-12 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-30 4:32 [PATCH -next v2] dmaengine: ste_dma40: fix error return code in d40_probe() Wei Yongjun
2013-05-30 4:32 ` Wei Yongjun
2013-05-30 4:32 ` Wei Yongjun
2013-05-30 7:41 ` Linus Walleij
2013-05-30 7:41 ` Linus Walleij
2013-05-30 7:41 ` Linus Walleij
2013-05-30 17:33 ` Vinod Koul
2013-05-30 17:33 ` Vinod Koul
2013-06-04 9:14 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-04 9:14 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-12 9:54 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2013-06-12 9:54 ` Vinod Koul
2013-06-13 7:49 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-13 7:49 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-17 13:50 ` Vinod Koul
2013-06-17 13:50 ` Vinod Koul
2013-06-17 13:50 ` Vinod Koul
2013-06-17 15:38 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-17 15:38 ` Linus Walleij
2013-05-30 18:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-05-30 18:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-05-31 1:07 ` Wei Yongjun
2013-05-31 1:07 ` Wei Yongjun
2013-05-31 1:07 ` Wei Yongjun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130612095443.GU4107@intel.com \
--to=vinod.koul@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.