All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org,
	matthew-Ztpu424NOJ8@public.gmane.org,
	dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	sage-4GqslpFJ+cxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
	smfrench-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	swhiteho-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	Trond.Myklebust-HgOvQuBEEgTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-afs-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	ceph-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	samba-technical-w/Ol4Ecudpl8XjKLYN78aQ@public.gmane.org,
	cluster-devel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	piastryyy-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/14] locks: move file_lock_list to a set of percpu hlist_heads and convert file_lock_lock to an lglock
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:37:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130613153742.GE20666@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370948948-31784-15-git-send-email-jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 07:09:08AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> The file_lock_list is only used for /proc/locks. The vastly common case
> is for locks to be put onto the list and come off again, without ever
> being traversed.
> 
> Help optimize for this use-case by moving to percpu hlist_head-s. At the
> same time, we can make the locking less contentious by moving to an
> lglock. When iterating over the lists for /proc/locks, we must take the
> global lock and then iterate over each CPU's list in turn.
> 
> This change necessitates a new fl_link_cpu field to keep track of which
> CPU the entry is on. On x86_64 at least, this field is placed within an
> existing hole in the struct to avoid growing its real size.

ACK.--b.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  fs/locks.c         |   57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  include/linux/fs.h |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
> index 8124fc1..094eb4d 100644
> --- a/fs/locks.c
> +++ b/fs/locks.c
> @@ -127,6 +127,8 @@
>  #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
>  #include <linux/pid_namespace.h>
>  #include <linux/hashtable.h>
> +#include <linux/percpu.h>
> +#include <linux/lglock.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>  
> @@ -165,8 +167,8 @@ int lease_break_time = 45;
>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(blocked_hash_lock);
>  static DEFINE_HASHTABLE(blocked_hash, BLOCKED_HASH_BITS);
>  
> -static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(file_lock_lock);
> -static HLIST_HEAD(file_lock_list);
> +DEFINE_STATIC_LGLOCK(file_lock_lglock);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct hlist_head, file_lock_list);
>  
>  static struct kmem_cache *filelock_cache __read_mostly;
>  
> @@ -512,17 +514,21 @@ locks_delete_global_blocked(struct file_lock *waiter)
>  static inline void
>  locks_insert_global_locks(struct file_lock *waiter)
>  {
> -	spin_lock(&file_lock_lock);
> -	hlist_add_head(&waiter->fl_link, &file_lock_list);
> -	spin_unlock(&file_lock_lock);
> +	lg_local_lock(&file_lock_lglock);
> +	waiter->fl_link_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +	hlist_add_head(&waiter->fl_link, this_cpu_ptr(&file_lock_list));
> +	lg_local_unlock(&file_lock_lglock);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void
>  locks_delete_global_locks(struct file_lock *waiter)
>  {
> -	spin_lock(&file_lock_lock);
> +	/* avoid taking lock if already unhashed */
> +	if (hlist_unhashed(&waiter->fl_link))
> +		return;
> +	lg_local_lock_cpu(&file_lock_lglock, waiter->fl_link_cpu);
>  	hlist_del_init(&waiter->fl_link);
> -	spin_unlock(&file_lock_lock);
> +	lg_local_unlock_cpu(&file_lock_lglock, waiter->fl_link_cpu);
>  }
>  
>  /* Remove waiter from blocker's block list.
> @@ -2228,6 +2234,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfs_cancel_lock);
>  #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
>  #include <linux/seq_file.h>
>  
> +struct locks_iterator {
> +	int	li_cpu;
> +	loff_t	li_pos;
> +};
> +
>  static void lock_get_status(struct seq_file *f, struct file_lock *fl,
>  			    loff_t id, char *pfx)
>  {
> @@ -2302,16 +2313,17 @@ static void lock_get_status(struct seq_file *f, struct file_lock *fl,
>  static int locks_show(struct seq_file *f, void *v)
>  {
>  	int bkt;
> +	struct locks_iterator *iter = f->private;
>  	struct file_lock *fl, *bfl;
>  
>  	fl = hlist_entry(v, struct file_lock, fl_link);
>  
> -	lock_get_status(f, fl, *((loff_t *)f->private), "");
> +	lock_get_status(f, fl, iter->li_pos, "");
>  
>  	spin_lock(&blocked_hash_lock);
>  	hash_for_each(blocked_hash, bkt, bfl, fl_link) {
>  		if (bfl->fl_next == fl)
> -			lock_get_status(f, bfl, *((loff_t *)f->private), " ->");
> +			lock_get_status(f, bfl, iter->li_pos, " ->");
>  	}
>  	spin_unlock(&blocked_hash_lock);
>  
> @@ -2320,23 +2332,24 @@ static int locks_show(struct seq_file *f, void *v)
>  
>  static void *locks_start(struct seq_file *f, loff_t *pos)
>  {
> -	loff_t *p = f->private;
> +	struct locks_iterator *iter = f->private;
>  
> -	spin_lock(&file_lock_lock);
> -	*p = (*pos + 1);
> -	return seq_hlist_start(&file_lock_list, *pos);
> +	iter->li_pos = *pos + 1;
> +	lg_global_lock(&file_lock_lglock);
> +	return seq_hlist_start_percpu(&file_lock_list, &iter->li_cpu, *pos);
>  }
>  
>  static void *locks_next(struct seq_file *f, void *v, loff_t *pos)
>  {
> -	loff_t *p = f->private;
> -	++*p;
> -	return seq_hlist_next(v, &file_lock_list, pos);
> +	struct locks_iterator *iter = f->private;
> +
> +	++iter->li_pos;
> +	return seq_hlist_next_percpu(v, &file_lock_list, &iter->li_cpu, pos);
>  }
>  
>  static void locks_stop(struct seq_file *f, void *v)
>  {
> -	spin_unlock(&file_lock_lock);
> +	lg_global_unlock(&file_lock_lglock);
>  }
>  
>  static const struct seq_operations locks_seq_operations = {
> @@ -2348,7 +2361,8 @@ static const struct seq_operations locks_seq_operations = {
>  
>  static int locks_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>  {
> -	return seq_open_private(filp, &locks_seq_operations, sizeof(loff_t));
> +	return seq_open_private(filp, &locks_seq_operations,
> +					sizeof(struct locks_iterator));
>  }
>  
>  static const struct file_operations proc_locks_operations = {
> @@ -2448,9 +2462,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(lock_may_write);
>  
>  static int __init filelock_init(void)
>  {
> +	int i;
> +
>  	filelock_cache = kmem_cache_create("file_lock_cache",
>  			sizeof(struct file_lock), 0, SLAB_PANIC, NULL);
>  
> +	lg_lock_init(&file_lock_lglock, "file_lock_lglock");
> +
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> +		INIT_HLIST_HEAD(per_cpu_ptr(&file_lock_list, i));
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index 232a345..18e59b8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -953,6 +953,7 @@ struct file_lock {
>  	unsigned int fl_flags;
>  	unsigned char fl_type;
>  	unsigned int fl_pid;
> +	int fl_link_cpu;		/* what cpu's list is this on? */
>  	struct pid *fl_nspid;
>  	wait_queue_head_t fl_wait;
>  	struct file *fl_file;
> -- 
> 1.7.1
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH v2 14/14] locks: move file_lock_list to a set of percpu hlist_heads and convert file_lock_lock to an lglock
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:37:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130613153742.GE20666@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370948948-31784-15-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com>

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 07:09:08AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> The file_lock_list is only used for /proc/locks. The vastly common case
> is for locks to be put onto the list and come off again, without ever
> being traversed.
> 
> Help optimize for this use-case by moving to percpu hlist_head-s. At the
> same time, we can make the locking less contentious by moving to an
> lglock. When iterating over the lists for /proc/locks, we must take the
> global lock and then iterate over each CPU's list in turn.
> 
> This change necessitates a new fl_link_cpu field to keep track of which
> CPU the entry is on. On x86_64 at least, this field is placed within an
> existing hole in the struct to avoid growing its real size.

ACK.--b.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/locks.c         |   57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  include/linux/fs.h |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
> index 8124fc1..094eb4d 100644
> --- a/fs/locks.c
> +++ b/fs/locks.c
> @@ -127,6 +127,8 @@
>  #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
>  #include <linux/pid_namespace.h>
>  #include <linux/hashtable.h>
> +#include <linux/percpu.h>
> +#include <linux/lglock.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>  
> @@ -165,8 +167,8 @@ int lease_break_time = 45;
>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(blocked_hash_lock);
>  static DEFINE_HASHTABLE(blocked_hash, BLOCKED_HASH_BITS);
>  
> -static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(file_lock_lock);
> -static HLIST_HEAD(file_lock_list);
> +DEFINE_STATIC_LGLOCK(file_lock_lglock);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct hlist_head, file_lock_list);
>  
>  static struct kmem_cache *filelock_cache __read_mostly;
>  
> @@ -512,17 +514,21 @@ locks_delete_global_blocked(struct file_lock *waiter)
>  static inline void
>  locks_insert_global_locks(struct file_lock *waiter)
>  {
> -	spin_lock(&file_lock_lock);
> -	hlist_add_head(&waiter->fl_link, &file_lock_list);
> -	spin_unlock(&file_lock_lock);
> +	lg_local_lock(&file_lock_lglock);
> +	waiter->fl_link_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +	hlist_add_head(&waiter->fl_link, this_cpu_ptr(&file_lock_list));
> +	lg_local_unlock(&file_lock_lglock);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void
>  locks_delete_global_locks(struct file_lock *waiter)
>  {
> -	spin_lock(&file_lock_lock);
> +	/* avoid taking lock if already unhashed */
> +	if (hlist_unhashed(&waiter->fl_link))
> +		return;
> +	lg_local_lock_cpu(&file_lock_lglock, waiter->fl_link_cpu);
>  	hlist_del_init(&waiter->fl_link);
> -	spin_unlock(&file_lock_lock);
> +	lg_local_unlock_cpu(&file_lock_lglock, waiter->fl_link_cpu);
>  }
>  
>  /* Remove waiter from blocker's block list.
> @@ -2228,6 +2234,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfs_cancel_lock);
>  #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
>  #include <linux/seq_file.h>
>  
> +struct locks_iterator {
> +	int	li_cpu;
> +	loff_t	li_pos;
> +};
> +
>  static void lock_get_status(struct seq_file *f, struct file_lock *fl,
>  			    loff_t id, char *pfx)
>  {
> @@ -2302,16 +2313,17 @@ static void lock_get_status(struct seq_file *f, struct file_lock *fl,
>  static int locks_show(struct seq_file *f, void *v)
>  {
>  	int bkt;
> +	struct locks_iterator *iter = f->private;
>  	struct file_lock *fl, *bfl;
>  
>  	fl = hlist_entry(v, struct file_lock, fl_link);
>  
> -	lock_get_status(f, fl, *((loff_t *)f->private), "");
> +	lock_get_status(f, fl, iter->li_pos, "");
>  
>  	spin_lock(&blocked_hash_lock);
>  	hash_for_each(blocked_hash, bkt, bfl, fl_link) {
>  		if (bfl->fl_next == fl)
> -			lock_get_status(f, bfl, *((loff_t *)f->private), " ->");
> +			lock_get_status(f, bfl, iter->li_pos, " ->");
>  	}
>  	spin_unlock(&blocked_hash_lock);
>  
> @@ -2320,23 +2332,24 @@ static int locks_show(struct seq_file *f, void *v)
>  
>  static void *locks_start(struct seq_file *f, loff_t *pos)
>  {
> -	loff_t *p = f->private;
> +	struct locks_iterator *iter = f->private;
>  
> -	spin_lock(&file_lock_lock);
> -	*p = (*pos + 1);
> -	return seq_hlist_start(&file_lock_list, *pos);
> +	iter->li_pos = *pos + 1;
> +	lg_global_lock(&file_lock_lglock);
> +	return seq_hlist_start_percpu(&file_lock_list, &iter->li_cpu, *pos);
>  }
>  
>  static void *locks_next(struct seq_file *f, void *v, loff_t *pos)
>  {
> -	loff_t *p = f->private;
> -	++*p;
> -	return seq_hlist_next(v, &file_lock_list, pos);
> +	struct locks_iterator *iter = f->private;
> +
> +	++iter->li_pos;
> +	return seq_hlist_next_percpu(v, &file_lock_list, &iter->li_cpu, pos);
>  }
>  
>  static void locks_stop(struct seq_file *f, void *v)
>  {
> -	spin_unlock(&file_lock_lock);
> +	lg_global_unlock(&file_lock_lglock);
>  }
>  
>  static const struct seq_operations locks_seq_operations = {
> @@ -2348,7 +2361,8 @@ static const struct seq_operations locks_seq_operations = {
>  
>  static int locks_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>  {
> -	return seq_open_private(filp, &locks_seq_operations, sizeof(loff_t));
> +	return seq_open_private(filp, &locks_seq_operations,
> +					sizeof(struct locks_iterator));
>  }
>  
>  static const struct file_operations proc_locks_operations = {
> @@ -2448,9 +2462,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(lock_may_write);
>  
>  static int __init filelock_init(void)
>  {
> +	int i;
> +
>  	filelock_cache = kmem_cache_create("file_lock_cache",
>  			sizeof(struct file_lock), 0, SLAB_PANIC, NULL);
>  
> +	lg_lock_init(&file_lock_lglock, "file_lock_lglock");
> +
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> +		INIT_HLIST_HEAD(per_cpu_ptr(&file_lock_list, i));
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index 232a345..18e59b8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -953,6 +953,7 @@ struct file_lock {
>  	unsigned int fl_flags;
>  	unsigned char fl_type;
>  	unsigned int fl_pid;
> +	int fl_link_cpu;		/* what cpu's list is this on? */
>  	struct pid *fl_nspid;
>  	wait_queue_head_t fl_wait;
>  	struct file *fl_file;
> -- 
> 1.7.1
> 



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, matthew@wil.cx, dhowells@redhat.com,
	sage@inktank.com, smfrench@gmail.com, swhiteho@redhat.com,
	Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
	ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org,
	samba-technical@lists.samba.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	piastryyy@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/14] locks: move file_lock_list to a set of percpu hlist_heads and convert file_lock_lock to an lglock
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:37:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130613153742.GE20666@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370948948-31784-15-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com>

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 07:09:08AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> The file_lock_list is only used for /proc/locks. The vastly common case
> is for locks to be put onto the list and come off again, without ever
> being traversed.
> 
> Help optimize for this use-case by moving to percpu hlist_head-s. At the
> same time, we can make the locking less contentious by moving to an
> lglock. When iterating over the lists for /proc/locks, we must take the
> global lock and then iterate over each CPU's list in turn.
> 
> This change necessitates a new fl_link_cpu field to keep track of which
> CPU the entry is on. On x86_64 at least, this field is placed within an
> existing hole in the struct to avoid growing its real size.

ACK.--b.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/locks.c         |   57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  include/linux/fs.h |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
> index 8124fc1..094eb4d 100644
> --- a/fs/locks.c
> +++ b/fs/locks.c
> @@ -127,6 +127,8 @@
>  #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
>  #include <linux/pid_namespace.h>
>  #include <linux/hashtable.h>
> +#include <linux/percpu.h>
> +#include <linux/lglock.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>  
> @@ -165,8 +167,8 @@ int lease_break_time = 45;
>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(blocked_hash_lock);
>  static DEFINE_HASHTABLE(blocked_hash, BLOCKED_HASH_BITS);
>  
> -static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(file_lock_lock);
> -static HLIST_HEAD(file_lock_list);
> +DEFINE_STATIC_LGLOCK(file_lock_lglock);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct hlist_head, file_lock_list);
>  
>  static struct kmem_cache *filelock_cache __read_mostly;
>  
> @@ -512,17 +514,21 @@ locks_delete_global_blocked(struct file_lock *waiter)
>  static inline void
>  locks_insert_global_locks(struct file_lock *waiter)
>  {
> -	spin_lock(&file_lock_lock);
> -	hlist_add_head(&waiter->fl_link, &file_lock_list);
> -	spin_unlock(&file_lock_lock);
> +	lg_local_lock(&file_lock_lglock);
> +	waiter->fl_link_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +	hlist_add_head(&waiter->fl_link, this_cpu_ptr(&file_lock_list));
> +	lg_local_unlock(&file_lock_lglock);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void
>  locks_delete_global_locks(struct file_lock *waiter)
>  {
> -	spin_lock(&file_lock_lock);
> +	/* avoid taking lock if already unhashed */
> +	if (hlist_unhashed(&waiter->fl_link))
> +		return;
> +	lg_local_lock_cpu(&file_lock_lglock, waiter->fl_link_cpu);
>  	hlist_del_init(&waiter->fl_link);
> -	spin_unlock(&file_lock_lock);
> +	lg_local_unlock_cpu(&file_lock_lglock, waiter->fl_link_cpu);
>  }
>  
>  /* Remove waiter from blocker's block list.
> @@ -2228,6 +2234,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfs_cancel_lock);
>  #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
>  #include <linux/seq_file.h>
>  
> +struct locks_iterator {
> +	int	li_cpu;
> +	loff_t	li_pos;
> +};
> +
>  static void lock_get_status(struct seq_file *f, struct file_lock *fl,
>  			    loff_t id, char *pfx)
>  {
> @@ -2302,16 +2313,17 @@ static void lock_get_status(struct seq_file *f, struct file_lock *fl,
>  static int locks_show(struct seq_file *f, void *v)
>  {
>  	int bkt;
> +	struct locks_iterator *iter = f->private;
>  	struct file_lock *fl, *bfl;
>  
>  	fl = hlist_entry(v, struct file_lock, fl_link);
>  
> -	lock_get_status(f, fl, *((loff_t *)f->private), "");
> +	lock_get_status(f, fl, iter->li_pos, "");
>  
>  	spin_lock(&blocked_hash_lock);
>  	hash_for_each(blocked_hash, bkt, bfl, fl_link) {
>  		if (bfl->fl_next == fl)
> -			lock_get_status(f, bfl, *((loff_t *)f->private), " ->");
> +			lock_get_status(f, bfl, iter->li_pos, " ->");
>  	}
>  	spin_unlock(&blocked_hash_lock);
>  
> @@ -2320,23 +2332,24 @@ static int locks_show(struct seq_file *f, void *v)
>  
>  static void *locks_start(struct seq_file *f, loff_t *pos)
>  {
> -	loff_t *p = f->private;
> +	struct locks_iterator *iter = f->private;
>  
> -	spin_lock(&file_lock_lock);
> -	*p = (*pos + 1);
> -	return seq_hlist_start(&file_lock_list, *pos);
> +	iter->li_pos = *pos + 1;
> +	lg_global_lock(&file_lock_lglock);
> +	return seq_hlist_start_percpu(&file_lock_list, &iter->li_cpu, *pos);
>  }
>  
>  static void *locks_next(struct seq_file *f, void *v, loff_t *pos)
>  {
> -	loff_t *p = f->private;
> -	++*p;
> -	return seq_hlist_next(v, &file_lock_list, pos);
> +	struct locks_iterator *iter = f->private;
> +
> +	++iter->li_pos;
> +	return seq_hlist_next_percpu(v, &file_lock_list, &iter->li_cpu, pos);
>  }
>  
>  static void locks_stop(struct seq_file *f, void *v)
>  {
> -	spin_unlock(&file_lock_lock);
> +	lg_global_unlock(&file_lock_lglock);
>  }
>  
>  static const struct seq_operations locks_seq_operations = {
> @@ -2348,7 +2361,8 @@ static const struct seq_operations locks_seq_operations = {
>  
>  static int locks_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>  {
> -	return seq_open_private(filp, &locks_seq_operations, sizeof(loff_t));
> +	return seq_open_private(filp, &locks_seq_operations,
> +					sizeof(struct locks_iterator));
>  }
>  
>  static const struct file_operations proc_locks_operations = {
> @@ -2448,9 +2462,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(lock_may_write);
>  
>  static int __init filelock_init(void)
>  {
> +	int i;
> +
>  	filelock_cache = kmem_cache_create("file_lock_cache",
>  			sizeof(struct file_lock), 0, SLAB_PANIC, NULL);
>  
> +	lg_lock_init(&file_lock_lglock, "file_lock_lglock");
> +
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> +		INIT_HLIST_HEAD(per_cpu_ptr(&file_lock_list, i));
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index 232a345..18e59b8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -953,6 +953,7 @@ struct file_lock {
>  	unsigned int fl_flags;
>  	unsigned char fl_type;
>  	unsigned int fl_pid;
> +	int fl_link_cpu;		/* what cpu's list is this on? */
>  	struct pid *fl_nspid;
>  	wait_queue_head_t fl_wait;
>  	struct file *fl_file;
> -- 
> 1.7.1
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-13 15:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-11 11:08 [PATCH v2 00/14] locks: scalability improvements for file locking Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:08 ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:08 ` [Cluster-devel] " Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] locks: make generic_add_lease and generic_delete_lease static Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:08   ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:08   ` [Cluster-devel] " Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] locks: comment cleanups and clarifications Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:08   ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:08   ` [Cluster-devel] " Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] locks: make "added" in __posix_lock_file a bool Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:08   ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:08   ` [Cluster-devel] " Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] locks: encapsulate the fl_link list handling Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:08   ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:08   ` [Cluster-devel] " Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:09 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] locks: convert to i_lock to protect i_flock list Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:09   ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:09   ` [Cluster-devel] " Jeff Layton
2013-06-13 14:41   ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-13 14:41     ` [Cluster-devel] " J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-13 15:09     ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-13 15:09       ` [Cluster-devel] " Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:09 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] locks: ensure that deadlock detection is atomic with respect to blocked_list modification Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:09   ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:09   ` [Cluster-devel] " Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:09 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] locks: convert fl_link to a hlist_node Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:09   ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:09   ` [Cluster-devel] " Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:09 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] locks: turn the blocked_list into a hashtable Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:09   ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:09   ` [Cluster-devel] " Jeff Layton
2013-06-13 14:50   ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-13 14:50     ` [Cluster-devel] " J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-11 11:09 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] locks: add a new "lm_owner_key" lock operation Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:09   ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:09   ` [Cluster-devel] " Jeff Layton
     [not found]   ` <1370948948-31784-12-git-send-email-jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-13 15:00     ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-13 15:00       ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-13 15:00       ` [Cluster-devel] " J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-11 11:09 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] seq_file: add seq_list_*_percpu helpers Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:09   ` [Cluster-devel] " Jeff Layton
     [not found]   ` <1370948948-31784-14-git-send-email-jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-13 15:27     ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-13 15:27       ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-13 15:27       ` [Cluster-devel] " J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-11 11:09 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] locks: move file_lock_list to a set of percpu hlist_heads and convert file_lock_lock to an lglock Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:09   ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:09   ` [Cluster-devel] " Jeff Layton
     [not found]   ` <1370948948-31784-15-git-send-email-jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-13 15:37     ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2013-06-13 15:37       ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-13 15:37       ` [Cluster-devel] " J. Bruce Fields
     [not found] ` <1370948948-31784-1-git-send-email-jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-11 11:08   ` [PATCH v2 01/14] cifs: use posix_unblock_lock instead of locks_delete_block Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:08     ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:08     ` [Cluster-devel] " Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:09   ` [PATCH v2 06/14] locks: don't walk inode->i_flock list in locks_show Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:09     ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:09     ` [Cluster-devel] " Jeff Layton
2013-06-13 19:45     ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-13 19:45       ` [Cluster-devel] " J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-13 20:26       ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-13 20:26         ` [Cluster-devel] " Jeff Layton
     [not found]         ` <51BB040C.3050101@samba.org>
2013-06-15 11:05           ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-15 11:05             ` [Cluster-devel] " Jeff Layton
     [not found]             ` <20130615070535.6367eed9-9yPaYZwiELC+kQycOl6kW4xkIHaj4LzF@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-15 15:04               ` Simo
2013-06-15 15:04                 ` Simo
2013-06-15 15:04                 ` [Cluster-devel] " Simo
2013-06-11 11:09   ` [PATCH v2 12/14] locks: give the blocked_hash its own spinlock Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:09     ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 11:09     ` [Cluster-devel] " Jeff Layton
     [not found]     ` <1370948948-31784-13-git-send-email-jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-13 15:02       ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-13 15:02         ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-13 15:02         ` [Cluster-devel] " J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-13 15:18         ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-13 15:18           ` [Cluster-devel] " Jeff Layton
     [not found]           ` <20130613111844.59421622-4QP7MXygkU+dMjc06nkz3ljfA9RmPOcC@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-13 15:20             ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-13 15:20               ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-13 15:20               ` [Cluster-devel] " J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-11 16:04   ` [PATCH v2 00/14] locks: scalability improvements for file locking J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-11 16:04     ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-11 16:04     ` [Cluster-devel] " J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-11 16:35     ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 16:35       ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-11 16:35       ` [Cluster-devel] " Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130613153742.GE20666@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields-uc3wqj2krung9huczpvpmw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust-HgOvQuBEEgTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ceph-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=cluster-devel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-afs-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=matthew-Ztpu424NOJ8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=piastryyy-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sage-4GqslpFJ+cxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=samba-technical-w/Ol4Ecudpl8XjKLYN78aQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=smfrench-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=swhiteho-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.