From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] pinctrl: sunxi: Move the pins definitions to a separate header
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 10:41:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130617084106.GE16699@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdajdrcLy6u2cKkrpYnh0Hqx8Hjx+zJ_tfpYCfJFqWCrZA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Linus,
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 01:03:09PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>
> > It will allow us to have a cleaner separation between the data needed by
> > the driver to work, and the core logic of the driver in itself, and will
> > allow having too much noise in the core driver in the future.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
>
> Patch applied.
>
> Since you will anyway have to bring the ARM SoC branch on
> top of the pinctrl tree, I might as well apply this to my tree.
Thanks for merging this.
I applied the other patches except for the 5th one that Emilio commented
on.
> If everything else fails, you'll have a nice development base
> in v3.11 with this in place, right?
Yes, As far as I can see, we should have a pretty complete support for
the GPIO/muxing/IRQ on the "old" allwinner SoCs (sun4i and sun5i) now.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Emilio Lopez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>,
kevin@allwinnertech.com, sunny@allwinnertech.com,
shuge@allwinnertech.com, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] pinctrl: sunxi: Move the pins definitions to a separate header
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 10:41:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130617084106.GE16699@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdajdrcLy6u2cKkrpYnh0Hqx8Hjx+zJ_tfpYCfJFqWCrZA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Linus,
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 01:03:09PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>
> > It will allow us to have a cleaner separation between the data needed by
> > the driver to work, and the core logic of the driver in itself, and will
> > allow having too much noise in the core driver in the future.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
>
> Patch applied.
>
> Since you will anyway have to bring the ARM SoC branch on
> top of the pinctrl tree, I might as well apply this to my tree.
Thanks for merging this.
I applied the other patches except for the 5th one that Emilio commented
on.
> If everything else fails, you'll have a nice development base
> in v3.11 with this in place, right?
Yes, As far as I can see, we should have a pretty complete support for
the GPIO/muxing/IRQ on the "old" allwinner SoCs (sun4i and sun5i) now.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-17 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-09 16:36 [PATCH 0/6] Add support for Allwinner A10s SoCs Maxime Ripard
2013-06-09 16:36 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-06-09 16:36 ` [PATCH 1/6] ARM: sunxi: Add Allwinner A10s machine compatible Maxime Ripard
2013-06-09 16:36 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-06-09 16:36 ` [PATCH 2/6] pinctrl: sunxi: Move the pins definitions to a separate header Maxime Ripard
2013-06-16 11:03 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 11:03 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-17 8:41 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2013-06-17 8:41 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-06-17 16:11 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-17 16:11 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-09 16:36 ` [PATCH 3/6] pinctrl: sunxi: Add Allwinner A10s pins Maxime Ripard
2013-06-09 16:36 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-06-16 11:04 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-16 11:04 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-09 16:36 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: sunxi: dt: Add Allwinner A10s DTSI Maxime Ripard
2013-06-09 16:36 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-06-09 21:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-09 21:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-10 10:34 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-06-10 10:34 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-06-10 14:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-10 14:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-09 16:36 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: sunxi: Add Olimex A10s-Olinuxino-micro device tree Maxime Ripard
2013-06-09 16:36 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-06-14 18:09 ` [linux-sunxi] " Emilio López
2013-06-14 18:09 ` Emilio López
2013-06-17 8:38 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-06-17 8:38 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-06-09 16:36 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: multi_v7: Enable Allwinner EMAC in multi_v7_defconfig Maxime Ripard
2013-06-09 16:36 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-06-15 13:14 ` [PATCH 0/6] Add support for Allwinner A10s SoCs Maxime Ripard
2013-06-15 13:14 ` Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130617084106.GE16699@lukather \
--to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.