From: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jan kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: ext4 extent status tree LRU locking
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:25:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130618022548.GA24671@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51BF7BAA.5030803@intel.com>
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 02:12:10PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 06/17/2013 03:10 AM, Zheng Liu wrote:
> > Dave, that would be great if you could do your testing again to confirm
> > this patch is useful.
>
> I was able to apply this to Ted's
>
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git/
>
> "ext4/dev" tree with a bit of fuzz. What did you generate this against,
> btw?
Ah, sorry, I forgot to mention that this patch bases against ext4/master
branch. Now ext4/dev branch has some regression when I run xfstests.
So I don't base against this branch to generate my patch.
Ted, I notice that now in ext4 tree we have 'dev', 'dev-with-revert',
and 'dev2' branches. Which one is the best to generate a new patch for
the next merge window?
>
> It does seem to be functioning OK for me, and passes the other tests
> that saw so much spinlock contention previously. You can add my
> Tested-by if you like.
Thanks for your testing.
Regards,
- Zheng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-18 2:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-11 23:22 ext4 extent status tree LRU locking Dave Hansen
2013-06-12 7:17 ` Zheng Liu
2013-06-12 15:09 ` Dave Hansen
2013-06-12 16:03 ` Zheng Liu
2013-06-12 17:52 ` Dave Hansen
2013-06-12 20:48 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-06-13 13:27 ` Zheng Liu
2013-06-13 13:35 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-06-14 3:27 ` Zheng Liu
2013-06-14 14:09 ` Zheng Liu
2013-06-14 14:02 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-06-14 17:00 ` Zheng Liu
2013-06-14 18:00 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-06-17 10:10 ` Zheng Liu
2013-06-17 21:12 ` Dave Hansen
2013-06-18 2:25 ` Zheng Liu [this message]
2013-06-18 2:51 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-06-18 3:49 ` Zheng Liu
2013-06-18 2:47 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-06-14 15:57 ` Dave Hansen
2013-06-14 17:11 ` Zheng Liu
2013-06-14 16:55 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130618022548.GA24671@gmail.com \
--to=gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.