From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, ananth@in.ibm.com,
masbock@linux.vnet.ibm.com, lcm@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
ying.huang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mce: acpi/apei: Honour Firmware First for MCA banks listed in APEI HEST CMC
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:39:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130620073943.GE32694@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130619175438.2852.93449.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:27:17PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> The Corrected Machine Check structure (CMC) in HEST has a flag which can be
> set by the firmware to indicate to the OS that it prefers to process the
> corrected error events first. In this scenario, the OS is expected to not
> monitor for corrected errors (through CMCI/polling). Instead, the firmware
> notifies the OS on corrected error events through GHES.
>
> Linux already has support for GHES. This patch adds support for parsing CMC
> structure and to disable CMCI/polling if the firmware first flag is set.
>
> Further, the list of machine check bank structures at the end of CMC is used
> to determine which MCA banks function in FF mode, so that we continue to
> monitor error events on the other banks.
>
>
> - Naveen
>
> --
> Changes:
> - Incorporated comments from Boris and Tony from the previous thread at
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.acpi.devel/60802
> - Added patch to disable firmware first mode through a boot option.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h | 3 ++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-internal.h | 3 ++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
> drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
> index fa5f71e..380fff8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
> @@ -188,6 +188,9 @@ extern void register_mce_write_callback(ssize_t (*)(struct file *filp,
> const char __user *ubuf,
> size_t usize, loff_t *off));
>
> +/* Disable CMCI/polling for MCA bank claimed by firmware */
> +extern void mce_disable_ce_bank(int bank);
> +
> /*
> * Exception handler
> */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-internal.h
> index 5b7d4fa..193edc1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-internal.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ int mce_severity(struct mce *a, int tolerant, char **msg);
> struct dentry *mce_get_debugfs_dir(void);
>
> extern struct mce_bank *mce_banks;
> +extern mce_banks_t mce_banks_ce_disabled;
> +
> +void cmci_disable_bank(int bank);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_MCE_INTEL
> unsigned long mce_intel_adjust_timer(unsigned long interval);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> index 9239504..9512034 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> @@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(mce_banks_t, mce_poll_banks) = {
> [0 ... BITS_TO_LONGS(MAX_NR_BANKS)-1] = ~0UL
> };
>
> +/* MCA banks controlled through firmware first for corrected errors */
> +mce_banks_t mce_banks_ce_disabled;
Why the second bitfield? The cleared bits in mce_poll_banks should be
the banks which are handled in FF mode, no?
> +
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct work_struct, mce_work);
>
> static void (*quirk_no_way_out)(int bank, struct mce *m, struct pt_regs *regs);
> @@ -1932,6 +1935,28 @@ static struct miscdevice mce_chrdev_device = {
> &mce_chrdev_ops,
> };
>
> +static void __mce_disable_ce_bank(void *arg)
> +{
> + int bank = *((int *)arg);
> +
> + /* Ensure we don't poll this bank */
No need for that comment.
> + __clear_bit(bank, __get_cpu_var(mce_poll_banks));
> + /* Disable CMCI */
No need for that comment either - function name cannot be more
descriptive :-)
> + cmci_disable_bank(bank);
> +}
> +
> +void mce_disable_ce_bank(int bank)
Yeah, let's call it ...disable_poll_bank because we're disabling polling
for those banks. And yes, we poll for errors for which no MCE exception
is generated and those happen to be corrected but still...
> +{
> + if (bank >= mca_cfg.banks) {
> + pr_warning(FW_BUG
> + "Ignoring request to disable invalid MCA bank %d.\n",
> + bank);
> + return;
> + }
> + set_bit(bank, mce_banks_ce_disabled);
> + on_each_cpu(__mce_disable_ce_bank, &bank, 1);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * mce=off Disables machine check
> * mce=no_cmci Disables CMCI
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
> index ae1697c..78256c0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
> @@ -191,6 +191,10 @@ static void cmci_discover(int banks)
> if (test_bit(i, owned))
> continue;
>
> + /* Skip banks in firmware first mode */
> + if (test_bit(i, mce_banks_ce_disabled))
> + continue;
> +
> rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL2(i), val);
>
> /* Already owned by someone else? */
> @@ -259,6 +263,20 @@ void cmci_recheck(void)
> local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
>
> +/* Caller must hold the lock on cmci_discover_lock */
> +static void __cmci_disable_bank(int bank)
> +{
> + u64 val;
> +
> + if (!test_bit(bank, __get_cpu_var(mce_banks_owned)))
> + return;
> + /* Disable CMCI */
> + rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL2(bank), val);
> + val &= ~MCI_CTL2_CMCI_EN;
> + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL2(bank), val);
> + __clear_bit(bank, __get_cpu_var(mce_banks_owned));
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Disable CMCI on this CPU for all banks it owns when it goes down.
> * This allows other CPUs to claim the banks on rediscovery.
> @@ -268,19 +286,12 @@ void cmci_clear(void)
> unsigned long flags;
> int i;
> int banks;
> - u64 val;
>
> if (!cmci_supported(&banks))
> return;
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
> for (i = 0; i < banks; i++) {
> - if (!test_bit(i, __get_cpu_var(mce_banks_owned)))
> - continue;
> - /* Disable CMCI */
> - rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL2(i), val);
> - val &= ~MCI_CTL2_CMCI_EN;
> - wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL2(i), val);
> - __clear_bit(i, __get_cpu_var(mce_banks_owned));
> + __cmci_disable_bank(i);
> }
This leaves only one line so no need for the {} braces anymore.
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
> }
> @@ -315,6 +326,19 @@ void cmci_reenable(void)
> cmci_discover(banks);
> }
>
> +void cmci_disable_bank(int bank)
> +{
> + int banks;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + if (!cmci_supported(&banks))
> + return;
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
> + __cmci_disable_bank(bank);
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
> +}
You need a prototype for that if you're going to call it from mce.c but
CONFIG_X86_MCE_INTEL is not set:
arch/x86/built-in.o: In function `__mce_disable_ce_bank':
/home/boris/kernel/linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c:1945: undefined reference to `cmci_disable_bank'
make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
> +
> static void intel_init_cmci(void)
> {
> int banks;
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c
> index f5ef5d5..d8c69ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <acpi/apei.h>
> +#include <asm/mce.h>
>
> #include "apei-internal.h"
>
> @@ -121,6 +122,39 @@ int apei_hest_parse(apei_hest_func_t func, void *data)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(apei_hest_parse);
>
> +/*
> + * Check if firmware advertises firmware first mode. We need FF bit to be set
> + * along with a set of MC banks which work in FF mode.
> + */
> +static int __init hest_parse_cmc(struct acpi_hest_header *hest_hdr, void *data)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct acpi_hest_ia_corrected *cmc;
> + struct acpi_hest_ia_error_bank *mc_bank;
> +
> + if (hest_hdr->type != ACPI_HEST_TYPE_IA32_CORRECTED_CHECK)
> + return 0;
> +
> + cmc = (struct acpi_hest_ia_corrected *)hest_hdr;
> + if (!cmc->enabled || !(cmc->flags & ACPI_HEST_FIRMWARE_FIRST))
> + return 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * We expect HEST to provide a list of MC banks that
> + * report errors through firmware first mode.
... in firmware first mode.
> + */
> + if (cmc->num_hardware_banks == 0)
if (!cmc->num_hardware_banks)
> + return 0;
Err, why does this function return 0 when the sanity checks above fail?
apei_hest_parse actually looks at the retval and advances the hest_hdr.
> +
> + pr_info(HEST_PFX "Enabling Firmware First mode for corrected errors.\n");
> +
> + mc_bank = (struct acpi_hest_ia_error_bank *)(cmc + 1);
> + for (i = 0; i < cmc->num_hardware_banks; i++, mc_bank++)
> + mce_disable_ce_bank(mc_bank->bank_number);
> +
> + return 0;
IOW, we should return 0 only here.
[ … ]
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, ananth@in.ibm.com,
masbock@linux.vnet.ibm.com, lcm@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
ying.huang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mce: acpi/apei: Honour Firmware First for MCA banks listed in APEI HEST CMC
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:39:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130620073943.GE32694@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130619175438.2852.93449.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:27:17PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> The Corrected Machine Check structure (CMC) in HEST has a flag which can be
> set by the firmware to indicate to the OS that it prefers to process the
> corrected error events first. In this scenario, the OS is expected to not
> monitor for corrected errors (through CMCI/polling). Instead, the firmware
> notifies the OS on corrected error events through GHES.
>
> Linux already has support for GHES. This patch adds support for parsing CMC
> structure and to disable CMCI/polling if the firmware first flag is set.
>
> Further, the list of machine check bank structures at the end of CMC is used
> to determine which MCA banks function in FF mode, so that we continue to
> monitor error events on the other banks.
>
>
> - Naveen
>
> --
> Changes:
> - Incorporated comments from Boris and Tony from the previous thread at
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.acpi.devel/60802
> - Added patch to disable firmware first mode through a boot option.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h | 3 ++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-internal.h | 3 ++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
> drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
> index fa5f71e..380fff8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
> @@ -188,6 +188,9 @@ extern void register_mce_write_callback(ssize_t (*)(struct file *filp,
> const char __user *ubuf,
> size_t usize, loff_t *off));
>
> +/* Disable CMCI/polling for MCA bank claimed by firmware */
> +extern void mce_disable_ce_bank(int bank);
> +
> /*
> * Exception handler
> */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-internal.h
> index 5b7d4fa..193edc1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-internal.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ int mce_severity(struct mce *a, int tolerant, char **msg);
> struct dentry *mce_get_debugfs_dir(void);
>
> extern struct mce_bank *mce_banks;
> +extern mce_banks_t mce_banks_ce_disabled;
> +
> +void cmci_disable_bank(int bank);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_MCE_INTEL
> unsigned long mce_intel_adjust_timer(unsigned long interval);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> index 9239504..9512034 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> @@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(mce_banks_t, mce_poll_banks) = {
> [0 ... BITS_TO_LONGS(MAX_NR_BANKS)-1] = ~0UL
> };
>
> +/* MCA banks controlled through firmware first for corrected errors */
> +mce_banks_t mce_banks_ce_disabled;
Why the second bitfield? The cleared bits in mce_poll_banks should be
the banks which are handled in FF mode, no?
> +
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct work_struct, mce_work);
>
> static void (*quirk_no_way_out)(int bank, struct mce *m, struct pt_regs *regs);
> @@ -1932,6 +1935,28 @@ static struct miscdevice mce_chrdev_device = {
> &mce_chrdev_ops,
> };
>
> +static void __mce_disable_ce_bank(void *arg)
> +{
> + int bank = *((int *)arg);
> +
> + /* Ensure we don't poll this bank */
No need for that comment.
> + __clear_bit(bank, __get_cpu_var(mce_poll_banks));
> + /* Disable CMCI */
No need for that comment either - function name cannot be more
descriptive :-)
> + cmci_disable_bank(bank);
> +}
> +
> +void mce_disable_ce_bank(int bank)
Yeah, let's call it ...disable_poll_bank because we're disabling polling
for those banks. And yes, we poll for errors for which no MCE exception
is generated and those happen to be corrected but still...
> +{
> + if (bank >= mca_cfg.banks) {
> + pr_warning(FW_BUG
> + "Ignoring request to disable invalid MCA bank %d.\n",
> + bank);
> + return;
> + }
> + set_bit(bank, mce_banks_ce_disabled);
> + on_each_cpu(__mce_disable_ce_bank, &bank, 1);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * mce=off Disables machine check
> * mce=no_cmci Disables CMCI
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
> index ae1697c..78256c0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
> @@ -191,6 +191,10 @@ static void cmci_discover(int banks)
> if (test_bit(i, owned))
> continue;
>
> + /* Skip banks in firmware first mode */
> + if (test_bit(i, mce_banks_ce_disabled))
> + continue;
> +
> rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL2(i), val);
>
> /* Already owned by someone else? */
> @@ -259,6 +263,20 @@ void cmci_recheck(void)
> local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
>
> +/* Caller must hold the lock on cmci_discover_lock */
> +static void __cmci_disable_bank(int bank)
> +{
> + u64 val;
> +
> + if (!test_bit(bank, __get_cpu_var(mce_banks_owned)))
> + return;
> + /* Disable CMCI */
> + rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL2(bank), val);
> + val &= ~MCI_CTL2_CMCI_EN;
> + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL2(bank), val);
> + __clear_bit(bank, __get_cpu_var(mce_banks_owned));
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Disable CMCI on this CPU for all banks it owns when it goes down.
> * This allows other CPUs to claim the banks on rediscovery.
> @@ -268,19 +286,12 @@ void cmci_clear(void)
> unsigned long flags;
> int i;
> int banks;
> - u64 val;
>
> if (!cmci_supported(&banks))
> return;
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
> for (i = 0; i < banks; i++) {
> - if (!test_bit(i, __get_cpu_var(mce_banks_owned)))
> - continue;
> - /* Disable CMCI */
> - rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL2(i), val);
> - val &= ~MCI_CTL2_CMCI_EN;
> - wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL2(i), val);
> - __clear_bit(i, __get_cpu_var(mce_banks_owned));
> + __cmci_disable_bank(i);
> }
This leaves only one line so no need for the {} braces anymore.
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
> }
> @@ -315,6 +326,19 @@ void cmci_reenable(void)
> cmci_discover(banks);
> }
>
> +void cmci_disable_bank(int bank)
> +{
> + int banks;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + if (!cmci_supported(&banks))
> + return;
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
> + __cmci_disable_bank(bank);
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
> +}
You need a prototype for that if you're going to call it from mce.c but
CONFIG_X86_MCE_INTEL is not set:
arch/x86/built-in.o: In function `__mce_disable_ce_bank':
/home/boris/kernel/linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c:1945: undefined reference to `cmci_disable_bank'
make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
> +
> static void intel_init_cmci(void)
> {
> int banks;
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c
> index f5ef5d5..d8c69ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <acpi/apei.h>
> +#include <asm/mce.h>
>
> #include "apei-internal.h"
>
> @@ -121,6 +122,39 @@ int apei_hest_parse(apei_hest_func_t func, void *data)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(apei_hest_parse);
>
> +/*
> + * Check if firmware advertises firmware first mode. We need FF bit to be set
> + * along with a set of MC banks which work in FF mode.
> + */
> +static int __init hest_parse_cmc(struct acpi_hest_header *hest_hdr, void *data)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct acpi_hest_ia_corrected *cmc;
> + struct acpi_hest_ia_error_bank *mc_bank;
> +
> + if (hest_hdr->type != ACPI_HEST_TYPE_IA32_CORRECTED_CHECK)
> + return 0;
> +
> + cmc = (struct acpi_hest_ia_corrected *)hest_hdr;
> + if (!cmc->enabled || !(cmc->flags & ACPI_HEST_FIRMWARE_FIRST))
> + return 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * We expect HEST to provide a list of MC banks that
> + * report errors through firmware first mode.
... in firmware first mode.
> + */
> + if (cmc->num_hardware_banks == 0)
if (!cmc->num_hardware_banks)
> + return 0;
Err, why does this function return 0 when the sanity checks above fail?
apei_hest_parse actually looks at the retval and advances the hest_hdr.
> +
> + pr_info(HEST_PFX "Enabling Firmware First mode for corrected errors.\n");
> +
> + mc_bank = (struct acpi_hest_ia_error_bank *)(cmc + 1);
> + for (i = 0; i < cmc->num_hardware_banks; i++, mc_bank++)
> + mce_disable_ce_bank(mc_bank->bank_number);
> +
> + return 0;
IOW, we should return 0 only here.
[ … ]
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-20 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-19 17:57 [PATCH v2 1/2] mce: acpi/apei: Honour Firmware First for MCA banks listed in APEI HEST CMC Naveen N. Rao
2013-06-19 17:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mce: acpi/apei: Add a boot option to disable ff mode for corrected errors Naveen N. Rao
2013-06-19 18:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-19 18:17 ` Naveen N. Rao
2013-06-19 18:19 ` Luck, Tony
2013-06-19 18:19 ` Luck, Tony
2013-06-19 18:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-19 19:05 ` Luck, Tony
2013-06-19 19:05 ` Luck, Tony
2013-06-19 20:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-19 20:33 ` Luck, Tony
2013-06-19 20:33 ` Luck, Tony
2013-06-19 21:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-19 21:28 ` Luck, Tony
2013-06-19 21:28 ` Luck, Tony
2013-06-19 21:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-19 22:08 ` Luck, Tony
2013-06-19 22:08 ` Luck, Tony
2013-06-20 5:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-20 21:21 ` Naveen N. Rao
2013-06-20 22:11 ` Luck, Tony
2013-06-20 22:11 ` Luck, Tony
2013-06-21 7:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-21 16:43 ` Naveen N. Rao
2013-06-28 12:04 ` Naveen N. Rao
2013-06-28 17:31 ` Tony Luck
2013-07-01 15:07 ` Naveen N. Rao
2013-07-01 15:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-01 15:41 ` Naveen N. Rao
2013-06-20 7:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-20 19:02 ` Naveen N. Rao
2013-06-20 7:39 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2013-06-20 7:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mce: acpi/apei: Honour Firmware First for MCA banks listed in APEI HEST CMC Borislav Petkov
2013-06-20 19:08 ` Naveen N. Rao
2013-06-20 19:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-20 20:14 ` Naveen N. Rao
2013-06-20 20:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-20 21:22 ` Naveen N. Rao
2013-06-21 7:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-21 7:46 ` Naveen N. Rao
2013-06-21 8:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-21 9:32 ` Naveen N. Rao
2013-06-21 14:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-21 16:47 ` Tony Luck
2013-06-21 17:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-25 17:46 ` Naveen N. Rao
2013-06-25 17:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-25 17:55 ` Luck, Tony
2013-06-25 17:55 ` Luck, Tony
2013-06-25 18:28 ` Naveen N. Rao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130620073943.GE32694@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=lcm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masbock@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.