From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: BUG: commit "ARM: Remove __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW on pre-ARMv6 CPUs" breaks armv5 with CONFIG_PREEMPT
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:12:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130620111255.GD18536@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130620102856.GC18536@arm.com>
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:28:56AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> We may need to place the preempt disable/enable at a higher level in the
> scheduler. My theory is that we have a context switch from prev to next.
> We get preempted just before finish_arch_post_lock_switch(), so the MMU
> hasn't been switched yet. The new switch during preemption happens to a
> thread with the same next mm, so the scheduler no longer switch_mm() and
> the TIF_SWITCH_MM isn't set for the new thread.
>
> I'll come back with another patch shortly.
Here's another attempt (as before, only compile-tested):
--------------------8<-------------------------------
>From 02af0f498a9c4b80c196d52c44ab7700fab0f6db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:59:38 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] arm: Fix deferred mm switch on VIVT processors
As of commit b9d4d42ad9 (ARM: Remove __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW on
pre-ARMv6 CPUs), the mm switching on VIVT processors is done in the
finish_arch_post_lock_switch() function to avoid whole cache flushing
with interrupts disabled. The need for deferred mm switch is stored as a
thread flag (TIF_SWITCH_MM). However, with preemption enabled, we can
have another thread switch before finish_arch_post_lock_switch(). If the
new thread has the same mm as the previous 'next' thread, the scheduler
will not call switch_mm() and the TIF_SWITCH_MM flag won't be set for
the new thread.
This patch moves the switch pending flag to the mm_context_t structure
since this is specific to the mm rather than thread.
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reported-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
---
arch/arm/include/asm/mmu.h | 2 ++
arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 8 +++++---
arch/arm/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 -
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu.h
index e3d5554..d1b4998 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu.h
@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
typedef struct {
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_ASID
atomic64_t id;
+#else
+ int switch_pending;
#endif
unsigned int vmalloc_seq;
} mm_context_t;
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
index a7b85e0..4309ae5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static inline void check_and_switch_context(struct mm_struct *mm,
* on non-ASID CPUs, the old mm will remain valid until the
* finish_arch_post_lock_switch() call.
*/
- set_ti_thread_flag(task_thread_info(tsk), TIF_SWITCH_MM);
+ mm->context.switch_pending = 1;
else
cpu_switch_mm(mm->pgd, mm);
}
@@ -56,9 +56,11 @@ static inline void check_and_switch_context(struct mm_struct *mm,
finish_arch_post_lock_switch
static inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
{
- if (test_and_clear_thread_flag(TIF_SWITCH_MM)) {
- struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
+ struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
+
+ if (mm->context.switch_pending) {
cpu_switch_mm(mm->pgd, mm);
+ mm->context.switch_pending = 0;
}
}
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/thread_info.h
index 1995d1a..f00b569 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/thread_info.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/thread_info.h
@@ -156,7 +156,6 @@ extern int vfp_restore_user_hwstate(struct user_vfp __user *,
#define TIF_USING_IWMMXT 17
#define TIF_MEMDIE 18 /* is terminating due to OOM killer */
#define TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK 20
-#define TIF_SWITCH_MM 22 /* deferred switch_mm */
#define _TIF_SIGPENDING (1 << TIF_SIGPENDING)
#define _TIF_NEED_RESCHED (1 << TIF_NEED_RESCHED)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-20 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-20 8:43 BUG: commit "ARM: Remove __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW on pre-ARMv6 CPUs" breaks armv5 with CONFIG_PREEMPT Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-06-20 9:25 ` Will Deacon
2013-06-20 9:51 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-06-20 9:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-06-20 10:08 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-06-20 10:14 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-06-20 10:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-06-20 11:12 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2013-06-20 11:35 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-06-20 11:39 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-06-20 11:47 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-06-20 12:48 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-06-20 13:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-06-20 13:05 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-06-21 10:28 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-06-21 13:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-07-17 8:41 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-07-17 8:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-07-17 11:48 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-07-17 19:41 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130620111255.GD18536@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.