From: fabio.baltieri@linaro.org (Fabio Baltieri)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Declare memcpy config as static
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:33:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130621073301.GA19353@balto.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130621031000.GB23141@intel.com>
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 08:40:00AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:17:39AM +0200, Fabio Baltieri wrote:
> > Fix sparse warnings:
> >
> > drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c:81:26: warning: symbol 'dma40_memcpy_conf_phy' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c:95:26: warning: symbol 'dma40_memcpy_conf_log' was not declared. Should it be static?
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org>
> Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
>
> I guess this would be dependent on recent ste_dma40 patches so best way is
> Linus's tree, right?
Yes, but I'm not sure Linus is going to send a third pull request for
dma40 so maybe I should just resend my last two dma40 patches for
arm-soc directly.
Thanks for the Ack.
Fabio
--
Fabio Baltieri
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Declare memcpy config as static
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:33:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130621073301.GA19353@balto.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130621031000.GB23141@intel.com>
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 08:40:00AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:17:39AM +0200, Fabio Baltieri wrote:
> > Fix sparse warnings:
> >
> > drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c:81:26: warning: symbol 'dma40_memcpy_conf_phy' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c:95:26: warning: symbol 'dma40_memcpy_conf_log' was not declared. Should it be static?
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org>
> Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
>
> I guess this would be dependent on recent ste_dma40 patches so best way is
> Linus's tree, right?
Yes, but I'm not sure Linus is going to send a third pull request for
dma40 so maybe I should just resend my last two dma40 patches for
arm-soc directly.
Thanks for the Ack.
Fabio
--
Fabio Baltieri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-21 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-20 9:17 [PATCH] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Declare memcpy config as static Fabio Baltieri
2013-06-20 9:17 ` Fabio Baltieri
2013-06-21 3:10 ` Vinod Koul
2013-06-21 3:10 ` Vinod Koul
2013-06-21 7:33 ` Fabio Baltieri [this message]
2013-06-21 7:33 ` Fabio Baltieri
2013-06-24 11:49 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-24 11:49 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130621073301.GA19353@balto.lan \
--to=fabio.baltieri@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.