All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] sched: Reschedule task on preferred NUMA node once selected
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 14:29:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130704132939.GQ1875@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130704122644.GA29916@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 05:56:44PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> * Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> [2013-07-03 15:21:33]:
> 
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index 2a0bbc2..b9139be 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -800,6 +800,37 @@ unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_delay = 1000;
> >   */
> >  unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_settle_count __read_mostly = 3;
> > 
> > +static unsigned long weighted_cpuload(const int cpu);
> > +
> > +static int
> > +find_idlest_cpu_node(int this_cpu, int nid)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long load, min_load = ULONG_MAX;
> > +	int i, idlest_cpu = this_cpu;
> > +
> > +	BUG_ON(cpu_to_node(this_cpu) == nid);
> > +
> > +	for_each_cpu(i, cpumask_of_node(nid)) {
> > +		load = weighted_cpuload(i);
> > +
> > +		if (load < min_load) {
> > +			struct task_struct *p;
> > +
> > +			/* Do not preempt a task running on its preferred node */
> > +			struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(i);
> > +			raw_spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock);
> 
> Not sure why we need this spin_lock? Cant this be done in a rcu block
> instead?
> 

Judging by how find_idlest_cpu works it would appear you are correct.
Thanks very much, I'm still pretty much a scheduler wuss. I know what I
want but not always how to get it :)

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] sched: Reschedule task on preferred NUMA node once selected
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 14:29:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130704132939.GQ1875@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130704122644.GA29916@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 05:56:44PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> * Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> [2013-07-03 15:21:33]:
> 
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index 2a0bbc2..b9139be 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -800,6 +800,37 @@ unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_delay = 1000;
> >   */
> >  unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_settle_count __read_mostly = 3;
> > 
> > +static unsigned long weighted_cpuload(const int cpu);
> > +
> > +static int
> > +find_idlest_cpu_node(int this_cpu, int nid)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long load, min_load = ULONG_MAX;
> > +	int i, idlest_cpu = this_cpu;
> > +
> > +	BUG_ON(cpu_to_node(this_cpu) == nid);
> > +
> > +	for_each_cpu(i, cpumask_of_node(nid)) {
> > +		load = weighted_cpuload(i);
> > +
> > +		if (load < min_load) {
> > +			struct task_struct *p;
> > +
> > +			/* Do not preempt a task running on its preferred node */
> > +			struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(i);
> > +			raw_spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock);
> 
> Not sure why we need this spin_lock? Cant this be done in a rcu block
> instead?
> 

Judging by how find_idlest_cpu works it would appear you are correct.
Thanks very much, I'm still pretty much a scheduler wuss. I know what I
want but not always how to get it :)

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-04 13:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-03 14:21 [PATCH 0/13] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA balancing V2 Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21 ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 01/13] mm: numa: Document automatic NUMA balancing sysctls Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21   ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 02/13] sched: Track NUMA hinting faults on per-node basis Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21   ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 03/13] sched: Select a preferred node with the most numa hinting faults Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21   ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 04/13] sched: Update NUMA hinting faults once per scan Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21   ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 05/13] sched: Favour moving tasks towards the preferred node Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21   ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 06/13] sched: Reschedule task on preferred NUMA node once selected Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21   ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-04 12:26   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-04 12:26     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-04 13:29     ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2013-07-04 13:29       ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 07/13] sched: Split accounting of NUMA hinting faults that pass two-stage filter Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21   ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 21:56   ` Johannes Weiner
2013-07-03 21:56     ` Johannes Weiner
2013-07-04  9:23     ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-04  9:23       ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-04 14:24       ` Rik van Riel
2013-07-04 14:24         ` Rik van Riel
2013-07-04 19:36       ` Johannes Weiner
2013-07-04 19:36         ` Johannes Weiner
2013-07-05  9:41         ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-05  9:41           ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-05 10:48         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-05 10:48           ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 08/13] sched: Increase NUMA PTE scanning when a new preferred node is selected Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21   ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 09/13] sched: Favour moving tasks towards nodes that incurred more faults Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21   ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 18:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-03 18:27     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-04  9:25     ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-04  9:25       ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 10/13] sched: Set the scan rate proportional to the size of the task being scanned Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21   ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 11/13] sched: Check current->mm before allocating NUMA faults Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21   ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 15:33   ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 15:33     ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-04 12:48   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-04 12:48     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-05 10:07     ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-05 10:07       ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 12/13] mm: numa: Scan pages with elevated page_mapcount Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21   ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 18:35   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-03 18:35     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-04  9:27     ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-04  9:27       ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 18:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-03 18:41     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-04  9:32     ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-04  9:32       ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 18:42   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-03 18:42     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 13/13] sched: Account for the number of preferred tasks running on a node when selecting a preferred node Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21   ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 18:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-03 18:32     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-04  9:37     ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-04  9:37       ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-04 13:07       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-04 13:07         ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-04 13:54         ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-04 13:54           ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-04 14:06           ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-04 14:06             ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-04 14:40             ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-04 14:40               ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 16:19 ` [PATCH 0/13] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA balancing V2 Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 16:19   ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 16:26   ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 16:26     ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-04 18:02 ` [PATCH RFC WIP] Process weights based scheduling for better consolidation Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-04 18:02   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-05 10:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-05 10:16     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-05 12:49     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-05 12:49       ` Srikar Dronamraju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130704132939.GQ1875@suse.de \
    --to=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.