From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Allow imx-pcm-{dma, fiq}.c to be modules
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 22:19:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130705211920.GK27646@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201307052255.10765.arnd@arndb.de>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 387 bytes --]
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 10:55:10PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 05 July 2013, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Is this actually OK with the FIQ APIs?
> I don't know. Why wouldn't it?
It was the only reason I could think of why that'd have been done.
> Other users of the same interfaces (mx1_camera, spi-s3c24xx) can also be
> modules, so I wouldn't expect a fundamental issue.
OK.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: Allow imx-pcm-{dma,fiq}.c to be modules
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 22:19:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130705211920.GK27646@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201307052255.10765.arnd@arndb.de>
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 10:55:10PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 05 July 2013, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Is this actually OK with the FIQ APIs?
> I don't know. Why wouldn't it?
It was the only reason I could think of why that'd have been done.
> Other users of the same interfaces (mx1_camera, spi-s3c24xx) can also be
> modules, so I wouldn't expect a fundamental issue.
OK.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130705/c6dd9378/attachment.sig>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Allow imx-pcm-{dma,fiq}.c to be modules
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 22:19:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130705211920.GK27646@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201307052255.10765.arnd@arndb.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 387 bytes --]
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 10:55:10PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 05 July 2013, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Is this actually OK with the FIQ APIs?
> I don't know. Why wouldn't it?
It was the only reason I could think of why that'd have been done.
> Other users of the same interfaces (mx1_camera, spi-s3c24xx) can also be
> modules, so I wouldn't expect a fundamental issue.
OK.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-05 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-05 15:45 [PATCH] ASoC: Allow imx-pcm-{dma,fiq}.c to be modules Arnd Bergmann
2013-07-05 15:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-07-05 17:33 ` Mark Brown
2013-07-05 17:33 ` Mark Brown
2013-07-05 20:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-07-05 20:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-07-05 20:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-07-05 21:19 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2013-07-05 21:19 ` Mark Brown
2013-07-05 21:19 ` Mark Brown
2013-07-05 21:58 ` [PATCH] ASoC: Allow imx-pcm-{dma, fiq}.c " Arnd Bergmann
2013-07-05 21:58 ` [PATCH] ASoC: Allow imx-pcm-{dma,fiq}.c " Arnd Bergmann
2013-07-05 21:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130705211920.GK27646@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=fabio.estevam@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.