All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: Hush Bensen <hush.bensen@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Richard Davies <richard@arachsys.com>,
	Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>, Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] mm: compaction: add compaction to zone_reclaim_mode
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 11:25:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130715092557.GR4081@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51E097E5.7060308@gmail.com>

On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 06:57:25PM -0500, Hush Bensen wrote:
> Target reclaim will be done once under low wmark in vanilla kernel,
> however, your patch change it to min wmark, why this behavior change?

This was connected to the previous question, so I tried to answer this
as well in the context of the previous email.

> > +			if (!order)
> > +				goto this_zone_full;
> > +			else
> 
> You do the works should be done in slow path, is it worth?

Not sure to understand the question sorry. The reason for checking
order is that I was skeptical in marking the zone as full, just
because an high order allocation failed. The problem is that if the
cache says "full" and it was just a jitter (like compaction not having
run) , we'll fallback into the other nodes.

In the previous patches however I made compaction a lot more reliable
(no more random skips where compaction isn't even tried for a while
after the cursor meets for example) so maybe I could still mark the
zone full without noticeable effects. The above code has changed in
the meanwhile as I moved the code elsewhere,, so it's better to wait I
send out the new version before reviewing the above further.

Thanks!
Andrea

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-15  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-05 15:10 [PATCH 0/7] RFC: adding compaction to zone_reclaim_mode > 0 Andrea Arcangeli
2013-06-05 15:10 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm: remove ZONE_RECLAIM_LOCKED Andrea Arcangeli
2013-06-05 19:23   ` Rik van Riel
2013-06-05 20:37   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-06-05 20:51     ` Christoph Lameter
2013-06-05 21:03       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-06-06 14:15         ` Christoph Lameter
2013-06-06 17:17           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-06-06 18:16             ` Christoph Lameter
2013-06-05 21:33   ` Rafael Aquini
2013-06-06  9:04   ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-06 17:37     ` Rik van Riel
2013-06-14 16:16       ` Rik van Riel
2013-06-17  9:30         ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-17 18:12           ` Rik van Riel
2013-06-26 20:10             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2013-06-05 15:10 ` [PATCH 2/7] mm: compaction: scan all memory with /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory Andrea Arcangeli
2013-06-05 19:34   ` Rik van Riel
2013-06-05 21:39   ` Rafael Aquini
2013-06-06  9:05   ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-05 15:10 ` [PATCH 3/7] mm: compaction: don't depend on kswapd to invoke reset_isolation_suitable Andrea Arcangeli
2013-06-05 19:49   ` Rik van Riel
2013-06-26 20:38     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2013-06-06  9:11   ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-26 20:48     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2013-06-06 12:47   ` Rafael Aquini
2013-06-05 15:10 ` [PATCH 4/7] mm: compaction: reset before initializing the scan cursors Andrea Arcangeli
2013-06-05 20:04   ` Rik van Riel
2013-06-06  9:14   ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-06 12:49   ` Rafael Aquini
2013-06-05 15:10 ` [PATCH 5/7] mm: compaction: increase the high order pages in the watermarks Andrea Arcangeli
2013-06-05 20:18   ` Rik van Riel
2013-06-28 22:14     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2013-06-06  9:19   ` Mel Gorman
2013-06-05 15:10 ` [PATCH 6/7] mm: compaction: export compact_zone_order() Andrea Arcangeli
2013-06-05 20:24   ` Rik van Riel
2013-06-05 15:10 ` [PATCH 7/7] mm: compaction: add compaction to zone_reclaim_mode Andrea Arcangeli
2013-06-05 22:21   ` Rik van Riel
2013-06-06 10:05   ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-11 16:02     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2013-07-12 12:26       ` Hush Bensen
2013-07-12 16:01         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2013-07-12 23:23           ` Hush Bensen
2013-07-15  9:16             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2013-07-12 23:57   ` Hush Bensen
2013-07-15  9:25     ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2013-06-06  8:53 ` [PATCH 0/7] RFC: adding compaction to zone_reclaim_mode > 0 Mel Gorman
2013-06-06 10:09 ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130715092557.GR4081@redhat.com \
    --to=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=aquini@redhat.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=hush.bensen@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=richard@arachsys.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.