From: Jim Rees <rees@umich.edu>
To: "J.Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@citi.umich.edu>,
NFS <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Is tcp autotuning really what NFS wants?
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:42:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130715134211.GA14237@umich.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130710022735.GI8281@fieldses.org>
Here's the thread on netdev where we discussed this issue:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121545498313619&w=2
Here is where I asked about an api to set a socket buf minimum:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121554794432038&w=2
There are many subtleties, and I suggest anyone who wants to try to fix this
code should read the email thread. The netdev people were pretty insistent
that we turn on autotuning; David Miller said the old behavior was
equivalent to "turn[ing] off half of the TCP stack."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-15 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20130710092255.0240a36d@notabene.brown>
2013-07-10 2:27 ` Is tcp autotuning really what NFS wants? J.Bruce Fields
2013-07-10 4:32 ` NeilBrown
2013-07-10 19:07 ` J.Bruce Fields
2013-07-15 4:32 ` NeilBrown
2013-07-16 1:58 ` J.Bruce Fields
2013-07-16 4:00 ` NeilBrown
2013-07-16 14:24 ` J.Bruce Fields
2013-07-18 0:03 ` Ben Myers
2013-07-24 21:07 ` J.Bruce Fields
2013-07-25 1:30 ` [PATCH] NFSD/sunrpc: avoid deadlock on TCP connection due to memory pressure NeilBrown
2013-07-25 12:35 ` Jim Rees
2013-07-25 20:18 ` J.Bruce Fields
2013-07-25 20:33 ` NeilBrown
2013-07-26 14:19 ` J.Bruce Fields
2013-07-30 2:48 ` NeilBrown
2013-08-01 2:49 ` J.Bruce Fields
2013-07-10 17:33 ` Is tcp autotuning really what NFS wants? Dean
2013-07-10 17:39 ` Ben Greear
2013-07-15 4:35 ` NeilBrown
2013-07-15 23:32 ` Ben Greear
2013-07-16 4:46 ` NeilBrown
2013-07-10 19:59 ` Michael Richardson
2013-07-15 1:26 ` Jim Rees
2013-07-15 5:02 ` NeilBrown
2013-07-15 11:57 ` Jim Rees
2013-07-15 13:42 ` Jim Rees [this message]
2013-07-16 1:10 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130715134211.GA14237@umich.edu \
--to=rees@umich.edu \
--cc=aglo@citi.umich.edu \
--cc=bfields@citi.umich.edu \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.