From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] pinctrl: Remove duplicate code in pinctrl_pm_select_state functions
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 23:31:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130717063144.GE7656@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51E557D1.4000707@ti.com>
* Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> [130716 07:32]:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On 07/16/2013 04:41 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >* Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> [130716 06:22]:
> >>Hi Tony,
> >>
> >>This patch causes boot failure when I've applied my patch
> >>"[RFC] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: add pinctrl handling"
> >>https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/21/309
> >>
> >>on top of it:
> >
> >Hmm this patch alone removes duplicate code and if it causes
> >issues I must have made a typo somewhere.
>
> No typo :) You've removed the check for !dev-pins.
Oh OK, sorry that was not intentional.
> And the failure place is:
> int pinctrl_pm_select_active_state(struct device *dev)
> {
> return pinctrl_pm_select_state(dev, dev->pins->active_state);
> ^^^^ here
> }
>
> If I understand everything right, the pinctrl support in Device core
> assumed to be optional - so, It's valid case, when there are no
> definition for device's pinctrl in DT at all.
>
> And in this case dev->pins == NULL and pinctrl_pm_select_*() API
> should return 0 always.
Care to post your patch as it sounds like you have it fixed
and tested?
Regards,
Tony
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] pinctrl: Remove duplicate code in pinctrl_pm_select_state functions
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 23:31:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130717063144.GE7656@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51E557D1.4000707@ti.com>
* Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> [130716 07:32]:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On 07/16/2013 04:41 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >* Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> [130716 06:22]:
> >>Hi Tony,
> >>
> >>This patch causes boot failure when I've applied my patch
> >>"[RFC] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: add pinctrl handling"
> >>https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/21/309
> >>
> >>on top of it:
> >
> >Hmm this patch alone removes duplicate code and if it causes
> >issues I must have made a typo somewhere.
>
> No typo :) You've removed the check for !dev-pins.
Oh OK, sorry that was not intentional.
> And the failure place is:
> int pinctrl_pm_select_active_state(struct device *dev)
> {
> return pinctrl_pm_select_state(dev, dev->pins->active_state);
> ^^^^ here
> }
>
> If I understand everything right, the pinctrl support in Device core
> assumed to be optional - so, It's valid case, when there are no
> definition for device's pinctrl in DT at all.
>
> And in this case dev->pins == NULL and pinctrl_pm_select_*() API
> should return 0 always.
Care to post your patch as it sounds like you have it fixed
and tested?
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-17 6:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-16 9:05 [PATCH 0/4] improved support for runtime muxing for pinctrl Tony Lindgren
2013-07-16 9:05 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-16 9:05 ` [PATCH 1/4] pinctrl: Remove duplicate code in pinctrl_pm_select_state functions Tony Lindgren
2013-07-16 9:05 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-16 13:15 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-07-16 13:15 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-07-16 13:15 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-07-16 13:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-16 13:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-16 14:25 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-07-16 14:25 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-07-16 14:25 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-07-17 6:31 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2013-07-17 6:31 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-16 9:05 ` [PATCH 2/4] pinctrl: Allow pinctrl to have multiple active states Tony Lindgren
2013-07-16 9:05 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-17 20:55 ` Stephen Warren
2013-07-17 20:55 ` Stephen Warren
2013-07-16 9:05 ` [PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: Add support for additional dynamic states Tony Lindgren
2013-07-16 9:05 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-16 9:35 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-16 9:35 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-16 9:35 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-07-16 12:06 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-16 12:06 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-17 21:14 ` Stephen Warren
2013-07-17 21:14 ` Stephen Warren
2013-07-18 7:25 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-18 7:25 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-18 10:53 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-18 10:53 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-18 19:21 ` Stephen Warren
2013-07-18 19:21 ` Stephen Warren
2013-07-19 7:29 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-19 7:29 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-19 18:52 ` Stephen Warren
2013-07-19 18:52 ` Stephen Warren
2013-07-29 9:05 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-29 9:05 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-29 22:01 ` Stephen Warren
2013-07-29 22:01 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-14 16:41 ` Linus Walleij
2013-08-14 16:41 ` Linus Walleij
2013-07-17 21:23 ` Stephen Warren
2013-07-17 21:23 ` Stephen Warren
2013-07-18 7:36 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-18 7:36 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-18 19:26 ` Stephen Warren
2013-07-18 19:26 ` Stephen Warren
2013-07-19 7:39 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-19 7:39 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-19 10:29 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-07-19 10:29 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-07-19 10:29 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-07-19 19:03 ` Stephen Warren
2013-07-19 19:03 ` Stephen Warren
2013-07-22 23:15 ` Linus Walleij
2013-07-22 23:15 ` Linus Walleij
2013-07-29 9:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-29 9:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-19 18:58 ` Stephen Warren
2013-07-19 18:58 ` Stephen Warren
2013-07-29 9:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-29 9:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-29 22:08 ` Stephen Warren
2013-07-29 22:08 ` Stephen Warren
2013-07-22 23:07 ` Linus Walleij
2013-07-22 23:07 ` Linus Walleij
2013-07-29 9:31 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-29 9:31 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-16 9:05 ` [PATCH 4/4] drivers: Add pinctrl handling for dynamic pin states Tony Lindgren
2013-07-16 9:05 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-17 21:21 ` Stephen Warren
2013-07-17 21:21 ` Stephen Warren
2013-07-18 7:50 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-18 7:50 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-18 13:48 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-18 13:48 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-16 9:14 ` [PATCH 0/4] improved support for runtime muxing for pinctrl Tony Lindgren
2013-07-16 9:14 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-17 11:49 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-07-17 11:49 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-07-17 11:49 ` Grygorii Strashko
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-07-18 15:15 [PATCHv2 " Tony Lindgren
2013-07-18 15:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] pinctrl: Remove duplicate code in pinctrl_pm_select_state functions Tony Lindgren
2013-07-18 15:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-07-22 22:43 ` Linus Walleij
2013-07-22 22:43 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130717063144.GE7656@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.