Re: [patch 0/3] mm: improve page aging fairness between zones/nodes

[Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>]

Hi Zlatko,

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 06:48:52PM +0200, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> On 19.07.2013 22:55, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> >The way the page allocator interacts with kswapd creates aging
> >imbalances, where the amount of time a userspace page gets in memory
> >under reclaim pressure is dependent on which zone, which node the
> >allocator took the page frame from.
> >
> >#1 fixes missed kswapd wakeups on NUMA systems, which lead to some
> >    nodes falling behind for a full reclaim cycle relative to the other
> >    nodes in the system
> >
> >#3 fixes an interaction where kswapd and a continuous stream of page
> >    allocations keep the preferred zone of a task between the high and
> >    low watermark (allocations succeed + kswapd does not go to sleep)
> >    indefinitely, completely underutilizing the lower zones and
> >    thrashing on the preferred zone
> >
> >These patches are the aging fairness part of the thrash-detection
> >based file LRU balancing.  Andrea recommended to submit them
> >separately as they are bugfixes in their own right.
> >
> 
> I have the patch applied and under testing. So far, so good. It
> looks like it could finally fix the bug that I was chasing few
> months ago (nicely described in your bullet #3). But, few more days
> of testing will be needed before I can reach a quality verdict.

I should have remembered that you talked about this problem... Thanks
a lot for testing!

May I ask for the zone layout of your test machine(s)?  I.e. how many
nodes if NUMA, how big Normal and DMA32 (on Node 0) are.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>