From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
"AneeshKumarK.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
Eric B Munson <emunson@mgebm.net>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] hugepage: optimize page fault path locking
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:18:20 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130729061820.GA4784@lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374848845-1429-1-git-send-email-davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 07:27:23AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> This patchset attempts to reduce the amount of contention we impose
> on the hugetlb_instantiation_mutex by replacing the global mutex with
> a table of mutexes, selected based on a hash. The original discussion can
> be found here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/12/428
Hello, Davidlohr.
I recently sent a patchset which remove the hugetlb_instantiation_mutex
entirely ('mm, hugetlb: remove a hugetlb_instantiation_mutex').
This patchset can be found here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/29/54
If possible, could you review it and test it whether your problem is
disappered with it or not?
Thanks.
>
> Patch 1: Allows the file region tracking list to be serialized by its own rwsem.
> This is necessary because the next patch allows concurrent hugepage fault paths,
> getting rid of the hugetlb_instantiation_mutex - which protects chains of struct
> file_regionin inode->i_mapping->private_list (VM_MAYSHARE) or vma_resv_map(vma)->regions
> (!VM_MAYSHARE).
>
> Patch 2: From David Gibson, for some reason never made it into the kernel.
> Further cleanups and enhancements from Anton Blanchard and myself.
> Details of how the hash key is selected is in the patch.
>
> Davidlohr Bueso (2):
> hugepage: protect file regions with rwsem
> hugepage: allow parallelization of the hugepage fault path
>
> mm/hugetlb.c | 134 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 106 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.7.11.7
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
"AneeshKumarK.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
Eric B Munson <emunson@mgebm.net>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] hugepage: optimize page fault path locking
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:18:20 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130729061820.GA4784@lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374848845-1429-1-git-send-email-davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 07:27:23AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> This patchset attempts to reduce the amount of contention we impose
> on the hugetlb_instantiation_mutex by replacing the global mutex with
> a table of mutexes, selected based on a hash. The original discussion can
> be found here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/12/428
Hello, Davidlohr.
I recently sent a patchset which remove the hugetlb_instantiation_mutex
entirely ('mm, hugetlb: remove a hugetlb_instantiation_mutex').
This patchset can be found here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/29/54
If possible, could you review it and test it whether your problem is
disappered with it or not?
Thanks.
>
> Patch 1: Allows the file region tracking list to be serialized by its own rwsem.
> This is necessary because the next patch allows concurrent hugepage fault paths,
> getting rid of the hugetlb_instantiation_mutex - which protects chains of struct
> file_regionin inode->i_mapping->private_list (VM_MAYSHARE) or vma_resv_map(vma)->regions
> (!VM_MAYSHARE).
>
> Patch 2: From David Gibson, for some reason never made it into the kernel.
> Further cleanups and enhancements from Anton Blanchard and myself.
> Details of how the hash key is selected is in the patch.
>
> Davidlohr Bueso (2):
> hugepage: protect file regions with rwsem
> hugepage: allow parallelization of the hugepage fault path
>
> mm/hugetlb.c | 134 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 106 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.7.11.7
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-29 6:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-26 14:27 [PATCH 0/2] hugepage: optimize page fault path locking Davidlohr Bueso
2013-07-26 14:27 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-07-26 14:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] hugepage: protect file regions with rwsem Davidlohr Bueso
2013-07-26 14:27 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-07-26 14:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] hugepage: allow parallelization of the hugepage fault path Davidlohr Bueso
2013-07-26 14:27 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-07-28 6:00 ` Hillf Danton
2013-07-28 6:00 ` Hillf Danton
2013-07-29 19:16 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-07-29 19:16 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-07-29 6:18 ` Joonsoo Kim [this message]
2013-07-29 6:18 ` [PATCH 0/2] hugepage: optimize page fault path locking Joonsoo Kim
2013-08-07 0:08 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-08-07 0:08 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-08-07 9:21 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-08-07 9:21 ` Joonsoo Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130729061820.GA4784@lge.com \
--to=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=davidlohr.bueso@hp.com \
--cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
--cc=emunson@mgebm.net \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.