From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Dong Fang <yp.fangdong@gmail.com>
Cc: mfasheh@suse.com, jlbec@evilplan.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
jeff.liu@oracle.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
sunil.mushran@gmail.com, tim.gardner@canonical.com,
xuejiufei@huawei.com, shencanquan@huawei.com,
ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v2] fs/ocfs2: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each()
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 10:49:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130729074928.GB5053@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374931429-14062-1-git-send-email-yp.fangdong@gmail.com>
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 09:23:49AM -0400, Dong Fang wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Dong Fang <yp.fangdong@gmail.com>
> ---
Put a note here what changed between v1 and v2. Also no one replied
to the v1 patch to say that it was obsolete. I will take care of it
this time but please handle it yourself in the future.
Anyway, please reply to let us know what changed between v1 and v2.
> fs/ocfs2/cluster/heartbeat.c | 14 +++++---------
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmast.c | 8 +++-----
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h | 4 +---
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmconvert.c | 11 +++--------
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdebug.c | 15 ++++-----------
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c | 20 +++++---------------
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c | 9 ++-------
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c | 17 ++++-------------
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c | 19 +++++--------------
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmunlock.c | 4 +---
> 10 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
>
regards,
dan carpenter
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Dong Fang <yp.fangdong@gmail.com>
Cc: mfasheh@suse.com, jlbec@evilplan.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
jeff.liu@oracle.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
sunil.mushran@gmail.com, tim.gardner@canonical.com,
xuejiufei@huawei.com, shencanquan@huawei.com,
ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs/ocfs2: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each()
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 10:49:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130729074928.GB5053@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374931429-14062-1-git-send-email-yp.fangdong@gmail.com>
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 09:23:49AM -0400, Dong Fang wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Dong Fang <yp.fangdong@gmail.com>
> ---
Put a note here what changed between v1 and v2. Also no one replied
to the v1 patch to say that it was obsolete. I will take care of it
this time but please handle it yourself in the future.
Anyway, please reply to let us know what changed between v1 and v2.
> fs/ocfs2/cluster/heartbeat.c | 14 +++++---------
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmast.c | 8 +++-----
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h | 4 +---
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmconvert.c | 11 +++--------
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdebug.c | 15 ++++-----------
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c | 20 +++++---------------
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c | 9 ++-------
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c | 17 ++++-------------
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c | 19 +++++--------------
> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmunlock.c | 4 +---
> 10 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
>
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-29 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-27 13:23 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v2] fs/ocfs2: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each() Dong Fang
2013-07-27 13:23 ` Dong Fang
2013-07-29 7:49 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2013-07-29 7:49 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-07-29 8:06 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Dan Carpenter
2013-07-29 8:06 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-07-30 16:00 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Dong Fang
2013-07-30 16:00 ` Dong Fang
2013-07-30 5:01 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Jeff Liu
2013-07-30 5:01 ` Jeff Liu
2013-07-30 18:26 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Dong Fang
2013-07-30 18:26 ` Dong Fang
2013-07-30 22:42 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Dong Fang
2013-07-30 22:42 ` Dong Fang
2013-07-30 10:51 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Dan Carpenter
2013-07-30 10:51 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130729074928.GB5053@mwanda \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jeff.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=shencanquan@huawei.com \
--cc=sunil.mushran@gmail.com \
--cc=tim.gardner@canonical.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xuejiufei@huawei.com \
--cc=yp.fangdong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.