From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@gmail.com>,
adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, bpm@sgi.com, elder@kernel.org,
hch@infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, a.sangwan@samsung.com,
Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fs: Introduce new flag FALLOC_FL_COLLAPSE_RANGE
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 10:54:47 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130801005447.GS13468@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130801004645.GC11378@thunk.org>
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:46:45PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 10:23:41AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 06:01:54PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > > Have you considered what happens if you have a 10 megabyte file, of
> > > which the first 5 megs are mmap'ed into a userspace process.
> > >
> > > Now suppose you call COLLAPASE_RANGE on a one megabyte range starting
> > > at offset 1024k from the beginning of the file.
> > >
> > > Does the right thing happen to the mmap'ed region in memory?
> >
> > Implementation detail. like a hole punch, it needs to invalidate the
> > range that it is operating over so mmap()d regions are refaulted
> > after the operation is done.
>
> It's not just the range that it's operating on, but also the region
> beyond the range that's been collapsed out.
Yes, that's part of "the range that it is operating over".
> A quick eyeball of the patch didn't seem to show any code that handled
> this, which is why I asked the question.
Right, but really it's the least of the problems I've noticed - the
XFS code is fundamentally broken in many ways - once I've finished
commenting on it, I'll have a quick look to see if the ext4 code has
the same fundamental flaws....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@gmail.com>,
adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, bpm@sgi.com, elder@kernel.org,
hch@infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, a.sangwan@samsung.com,
Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fs: Introduce new flag FALLOC_FL_COLLAPSE_RANGE
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 10:54:47 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130801005447.GS13468@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130801004645.GC11378@thunk.org>
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:46:45PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 10:23:41AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 06:01:54PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > > Have you considered what happens if you have a 10 megabyte file, of
> > > which the first 5 megs are mmap'ed into a userspace process.
> > >
> > > Now suppose you call COLLAPASE_RANGE on a one megabyte range starting
> > > at offset 1024k from the beginning of the file.
> > >
> > > Does the right thing happen to the mmap'ed region in memory?
> >
> > Implementation detail. like a hole punch, it needs to invalidate the
> > range that it is operating over so mmap()d regions are refaulted
> > after the operation is done.
>
> It's not just the range that it's operating on, but also the region
> beyond the range that's been collapsed out.
Yes, that's part of "the range that it is operating over".
> A quick eyeball of the patch didn't seem to show any code that handled
> this, which is why I asked the question.
Right, but really it's the least of the problems I've noticed - the
XFS code is fundamentally broken in many ways - once I've finished
commenting on it, I'll have a quick look to see if the ext4 code has
the same fundamental flaws....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-01 0:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-31 14:42 [PATCH 1/3] fs: Introduce new flag FALLOC_FL_COLLAPSE_RANGE Namjae Jeon
2013-07-31 14:42 ` Namjae Jeon
2013-07-31 22:01 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-07-31 22:01 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-08-01 0:23 ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-01 0:23 ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-01 0:46 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-08-01 0:46 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-08-01 0:54 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2013-08-01 0:54 ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-01 1:07 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-08-01 1:07 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-08-01 2:59 ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-01 2:59 ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-01 4:06 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-08-01 4:06 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-08-01 4:32 ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-01 4:32 ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-01 0:22 ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-01 0:22 ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-01 5:07 ` Namjae Jeon
2013-08-01 5:07 ` Namjae Jeon
2013-08-02 2:37 ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-02 2:37 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130801005447.GS13468@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=a.sangwan@samsung.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=elder@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linkinjeon@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namjae.jeon@samsung.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.