From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: gleb@redhat.com, mingo@redhat.com, jeremy@goop.org,
x86@kernel.org, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, hpa@zytor.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com, riel@redhat.com,
andi@firstfloor.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
drjones@redhat.com, ouyang@cs.pitt.edu,
srivatsa.vaddagiri@gmail.com, avi.kivity@gmail.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
chegu_vinod@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V12 4/5] kvm hypervisor : Simplify kvm_for_each_vcpu with kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 23:53:30 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130806182330.2386.64291.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130806182150.2386.95104.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com>
kvm hypervisor: Simplify kvm_for_each_vcpu with kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Note that we are using APIC_DM_REMRD which has reserved usage.
In future if APIC_DM_REMRD usage is standardized, then we should
find some other way or go back to old method.
Suggested-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 5 ++++-
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 25 ++++++-------------------
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
index afc1124..48c13c9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
@@ -706,7 +706,10 @@ out:
break;
case APIC_DM_REMRD:
- apic_debug("Ignoring delivery mode 3\n");
+ result = 1;
+ vcpu->arch.pv.pv_unhalted = 1;
+ kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
+ kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
break;
case APIC_DM_SMI:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 1e73dab..640d112 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -5502,27 +5502,14 @@ int kvm_hv_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
*/
static void kvm_pv_kick_cpu_op(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long flags, int apicid)
{
- struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = NULL;
- int i;
+ struct kvm_lapic_irq lapic_irq;
- kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
- if (!kvm_apic_present(vcpu))
- continue;
+ lapic_irq.shorthand = 0;
+ lapic_irq.dest_mode = 0;
+ lapic_irq.dest_id = apicid;
- if (kvm_apic_match_dest(vcpu, 0, 0, apicid, 0))
- break;
- }
- if (vcpu) {
- /*
- * Setting unhalt flag here can result in spurious runnable
- * state when unhalt reset does not happen in vcpu_block.
- * But that is harmless since that should soon result in halt.
- */
- vcpu->arch.pv.pv_unhalted = true;
- /* We need everybody see unhalt before vcpu unblocks */
- smp_wmb();
- kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
- }
+ lapic_irq.delivery_mode = APIC_DM_REMRD;
+ kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic(kvm, 0, &lapic_irq, NULL);
}
int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: <gleb@redhat.com>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <jeremy@goop.org>,
<x86@kernel.org>, <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
<pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com, riel@redhat.com,
andi@firstfloor.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
drjones@redhat.com, ouyang@cs.pitt.edu,
srivatsa.vaddagiri@gmail.com, avi.kivity@gmail.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
chegu_vinod@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V12 4/5] kvm hypervisor : Simplify kvm_for_each_vcpu with kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 23:53:30 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130806182330.2386.64291.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130806182150.2386.95104.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com>
kvm hypervisor: Simplify kvm_for_each_vcpu with kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Note that we are using APIC_DM_REMRD which has reserved usage.
In future if APIC_DM_REMRD usage is standardized, then we should
find some other way or go back to old method.
Suggested-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 5 ++++-
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 25 ++++++-------------------
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
index afc1124..48c13c9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
@@ -706,7 +706,10 @@ out:
break;
case APIC_DM_REMRD:
- apic_debug("Ignoring delivery mode 3\n");
+ result = 1;
+ vcpu->arch.pv.pv_unhalted = 1;
+ kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
+ kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
break;
case APIC_DM_SMI:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 1e73dab..640d112 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -5502,27 +5502,14 @@ int kvm_hv_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
*/
static void kvm_pv_kick_cpu_op(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long flags, int apicid)
{
- struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = NULL;
- int i;
+ struct kvm_lapic_irq lapic_irq;
- kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
- if (!kvm_apic_present(vcpu))
- continue;
+ lapic_irq.shorthand = 0;
+ lapic_irq.dest_mode = 0;
+ lapic_irq.dest_id = apicid;
- if (kvm_apic_match_dest(vcpu, 0, 0, apicid, 0))
- break;
- }
- if (vcpu) {
- /*
- * Setting unhalt flag here can result in spurious runnable
- * state when unhalt reset does not happen in vcpu_block.
- * But that is harmless since that should soon result in halt.
- */
- vcpu->arch.pv.pv_unhalted = true;
- /* We need everybody see unhalt before vcpu unblocks */
- smp_wmb();
- kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
- }
+ lapic_irq.delivery_mode = APIC_DM_REMRD;
+ kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic(kvm, 0, &lapic_irq, NULL);
}
int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: <gleb@redhat.com>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <jeremy@goop.org>,
<x86@kernel.org>, <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
<pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: <agraf@suse.de>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, <habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<riel@redhat.com>,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<drjones@redhat.com>, <avi.kivity@gmail.com>,
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <chegu_vinod@hp.com>,
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<mtosatti@redhat.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
<srivatsa.vaddagiri@gmail.com>, <ouyang@cs.pitt.edu>,
<andi@firstfloor.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH V12 4/5] kvm hypervisor : Simplify kvm_for_each_vcpu with kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 23:53:30 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130806182330.2386.64291.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130806182150.2386.95104.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com>
kvm hypervisor: Simplify kvm_for_each_vcpu with kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Note that we are using APIC_DM_REMRD which has reserved usage.
In future if APIC_DM_REMRD usage is standardized, then we should
find some other way or go back to old method.
Suggested-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 5 ++++-
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 25 ++++++-------------------
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
index afc1124..48c13c9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
@@ -706,7 +706,10 @@ out:
break;
case APIC_DM_REMRD:
- apic_debug("Ignoring delivery mode 3\n");
+ result = 1;
+ vcpu->arch.pv.pv_unhalted = 1;
+ kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
+ kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
break;
case APIC_DM_SMI:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 1e73dab..640d112 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -5502,27 +5502,14 @@ int kvm_hv_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
*/
static void kvm_pv_kick_cpu_op(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long flags, int apicid)
{
- struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = NULL;
- int i;
+ struct kvm_lapic_irq lapic_irq;
- kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
- if (!kvm_apic_present(vcpu))
- continue;
+ lapic_irq.shorthand = 0;
+ lapic_irq.dest_mode = 0;
+ lapic_irq.dest_id = apicid;
- if (kvm_apic_match_dest(vcpu, 0, 0, apicid, 0))
- break;
- }
- if (vcpu) {
- /*
- * Setting unhalt flag here can result in spurious runnable
- * state when unhalt reset does not happen in vcpu_block.
- * But that is harmless since that should soon result in halt.
- */
- vcpu->arch.pv.pv_unhalted = true;
- /* We need everybody see unhalt before vcpu unblocks */
- smp_wmb();
- kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
- }
+ lapic_irq.delivery_mode = APIC_DM_REMRD;
+ kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic(kvm, 0, &lapic_irq, NULL);
}
int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-06 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-06 18:21 [PATCH V12 0/5] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks for KVM host Raghavendra K T
2013-08-06 18:21 ` Raghavendra K T
2013-08-06 18:21 ` Raghavendra K T
2013-08-06 18:22 ` [PATCH V12 1/5] kvm uapi: Add KICK_CPU and PV_UNHALT definition to uapi Raghavendra K T
2013-08-06 18:22 ` Raghavendra K T
2013-08-06 18:22 ` Raghavendra K T
2013-08-06 18:22 ` [PATCH V12 2/5] kvm hypervisor : Add a hypercall to KVM hypervisor to support pv-ticketlocks Raghavendra K T
2013-08-06 18:22 ` Raghavendra K T
2013-08-06 18:23 ` [PATCH V12 3/5] kvm : Fold pv_unhalt flag into GET_MP_STATE ioctl to aid migration Raghavendra K T
2013-08-06 18:32 ` Eric Northup
2013-08-06 19:10 ` Raghavendra K T
2013-08-06 19:10 ` Raghavendra K T
2013-08-25 12:43 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-25 12:43 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-06 18:32 ` Eric Northup
2013-08-06 18:23 ` Raghavendra K T
2013-08-06 18:23 ` Raghavendra K T [this message]
2013-08-06 18:23 ` [PATCH V12 4/5] kvm hypervisor : Simplify kvm_for_each_vcpu with kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic Raghavendra K T
2013-08-06 18:23 ` Raghavendra K T
2013-08-06 18:23 ` [PATCH V12 5/5] Documentation/kvm : Add documentation on Hypercalls and features used for PV spinlock Raghavendra K T
2013-08-06 18:23 ` Raghavendra K T
2013-08-06 18:23 ` Raghavendra K T
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130806182330.2386.64291.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com \
--to=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=avi.kivity@gmail.com \
--cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ouyang@cs.pitt.edu \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=srivatsa.vaddagiri@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.