From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Brad Spengler <spender@grsecurity.net>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Colin Walters <walters@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH? fix unshare(NEWPID) && vfork()
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 20:43:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130819184355.GA25362@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrWrpNszRGCRRMLgiOopcSdDShB3Mck6gRPco=dAZeX3pQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 08/19, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > So do you think this change is fine or not (ignoring the fact it needs
> > cleanups) ?
>
> I think that removing the CLONE_VM check is fine (although there are
> some other ones that should probably be removed as well), but I'm not
> sure if that check needs replacing with something else.
OK, thanks... but I still can't understand.
The patch I sent is equivalent to the new one below. I just tried to
unify it with another check in do_fork().
Oleg.
--- x/kernel/fork.c
+++ x/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1176,7 +1176,7 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
* If the new process will be in a different pid namespace
* don't allow the creation of threads.
*/
- if ((clone_flags & (CLONE_VM|CLONE_NEWPID)) &&
+ if ((clone_flags & (CLONE_THREAD | CLONE_PARENT | CLONE_NEWPID)) &&
(task_active_pid_ns(current) != current->nsproxy->pid_ns))
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-19 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-19 17:25 PATCH? fix unshare(NEWPID) && vfork() Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-19 17:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-08-19 17:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-19 18:10 ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-08-19 18:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-19 18:40 ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-08-19 18:43 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-08-20 17:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-20 18:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-20 20:52 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-21 16:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-22 16:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-20 17:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-08-20 18:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-20 19:00 ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-08-20 19:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-20 19:13 ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-08-20 19:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-20 19:38 ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-08-21 12:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-20 20:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130819184355.GA25362@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=spender@grsecurity.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=walters@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.