From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: "arm@kernel.org" <arm@kernel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] omap fixes against v3.11-rc5
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 05:32:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130820123232.GN7656@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOesGMiQBajdyW5AFJx6ASh1pHmdDPrh6Gy3o2HOBtFc9-g_Ag@mail.gmail.com>
* Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> [130816 15:05]:
>
> Our current fixes branch is based on -rc4, and I didn't see any of
> these commits in linux-next, so I took the liberty to rebase them back
> onto our current branch.
>
> I.e. pulled, but rebased.
Thanks no problem at my end. But to avoid future confusion, what's
the reasoning for rebasing? AFAIK, pulling this in would have just
automatically updated your branch to -rc5, no?
The only time where pulling in a branch based on a later mainline
commit would cause problems is if your branch is based on another
series of patches you want to send separately as then you'd get
all the commits between -rc4 and -rc5 when doing the pull request.
Probably nothing new in this for your, but FYI, you can use pulling
or merging branches as a way of updating your publick branches without
rebasing or adding extra merge commits while keeping the branch
pullable.
Let's assume you have arm-soc/fixes based on -rc4, and -rc5
comes out:
$ git checkout -b my-fixes-of-the-week v3.11-rc5
# apply pending patches
...
$ git checkout arm-soc/fixes
$ git merge my-fixes-of-the-week
And then you have essentially fast forwarded your arm-soc/fixes to
-rc5 and it stays pullable ;)
Regards,
Tony
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] omap fixes against v3.11-rc5
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 05:32:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130820123232.GN7656@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOesGMiQBajdyW5AFJx6ASh1pHmdDPrh6Gy3o2HOBtFc9-g_Ag@mail.gmail.com>
* Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> [130816 15:05]:
>
> Our current fixes branch is based on -rc4, and I didn't see any of
> these commits in linux-next, so I took the liberty to rebase them back
> onto our current branch.
>
> I.e. pulled, but rebased.
Thanks no problem at my end. But to avoid future confusion, what's
the reasoning for rebasing? AFAIK, pulling this in would have just
automatically updated your branch to -rc5, no?
The only time where pulling in a branch based on a later mainline
commit would cause problems is if your branch is based on another
series of patches you want to send separately as then you'd get
all the commits between -rc4 and -rc5 when doing the pull request.
Probably nothing new in this for your, but FYI, you can use pulling
or merging branches as a way of updating your publick branches without
rebasing or adding extra merge commits while keeping the branch
pullable.
Let's assume you have arm-soc/fixes based on -rc4, and -rc5
comes out:
$ git checkout -b my-fixes-of-the-week v3.11-rc5
# apply pending patches
...
$ git checkout arm-soc/fixes
$ git merge my-fixes-of-the-week
And then you have essentially fast forwarded your arm-soc/fixes to
-rc5 and it stays pullable ;)
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-20 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-16 7:19 [GIT PULL] omap fixes against v3.11-rc5 Tony Lindgren
2013-08-16 7:19 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-08-16 21:58 ` Olof Johansson
2013-08-16 21:58 ` Olof Johansson
2013-08-20 12:32 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2013-08-20 12:32 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-08-22 5:26 ` Olof Johansson
2013-08-22 5:26 ` Olof Johansson
2013-08-22 7:10 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-08-22 7:10 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130820123232.GN7656@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.