From: davej@redhat.com (Dave Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] [ARM ATTEND] catching up on exploit mitigations
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:43:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130821154355.GA20784@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130821152614.GN17845@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 04:26:14PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:24:30AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:40:12AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 08:04:44PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > > To use ARM as an example, the bugs I've seen have mostly been in arch specific
> > > > code that does things like page-table manipulation. The chromebook bugs I
> > > > was hitting for eg were various kinds of PTE corruption warnings.
> > >
> > > Hmm, really? Did you reported these bugs? I'm not aware of mainline
> > > having any changes related to bug reports on PTEs on ARM.
> >
> > I wasn't sure if it was a googleism, or happens on mainline, so no.
>
> I've been running several iterations of it for a while (== up to 10 minutes
> run time - which is normally about how long it takes to find the rather-too-
> exposed kmalloc in sys_oabi_epoll_wait) and so far have seen no sign of any
> page table corruption.
awesome. Guess it was a google specific issue then.
(Or something that got fixed post 3.4)
> Maybe you can give some ideas as to how you were running it? Was it
> running as root or as a normal user?
yeah, unpriv'd user.
> Were there any nonstandard platform
> specific devices in /dev which that user could access - such as graphics
> or video decoder devices which could be exposing big holes?
I'm not sure what google patched into that kernel altogether, so who knows..
Dave
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>,
ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] [ARM ATTEND] catching up on exploit mitigations
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:43:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130821154355.GA20784@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130821152614.GN17845@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 04:26:14PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:24:30AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:40:12AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 08:04:44PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > > To use ARM as an example, the bugs I've seen have mostly been in arch specific
> > > > code that does things like page-table manipulation. The chromebook bugs I
> > > > was hitting for eg were various kinds of PTE corruption warnings.
> > >
> > > Hmm, really? Did you reported these bugs? I'm not aware of mainline
> > > having any changes related to bug reports on PTEs on ARM.
> >
> > I wasn't sure if it was a googleism, or happens on mainline, so no.
>
> I've been running several iterations of it for a while (== up to 10 minutes
> run time - which is normally about how long it takes to find the rather-too-
> exposed kmalloc in sys_oabi_epoll_wait) and so far have seen no sign of any
> page table corruption.
awesome. Guess it was a google specific issue then.
(Or something that got fixed post 3.4)
> Maybe you can give some ideas as to how you were running it? Was it
> running as root or as a normal user?
yeah, unpriv'd user.
> Were there any nonstandard platform
> specific devices in /dev which that user could access - such as graphics
> or video decoder devices which could be exposing big holes?
I'm not sure what google patched into that kernel altogether, so who knows..
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-21 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-30 19:05 [ARM ATTEND] catching up on exploit mitigations Kees Cook
2013-07-30 19:05 ` Kees Cook
2013-07-30 22:14 ` [Ksummit-2013-discuss] " Dave Jones
2013-07-30 22:14 ` Dave Jones
2013-07-30 22:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-30 22:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-31 13:55 ` Jason Cooper
2013-07-31 13:55 ` Jason Cooper
2013-07-30 23:11 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-07-30 23:11 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-07-30 23:15 ` Dave Jones
2013-07-30 23:15 ` Dave Jones
2013-07-30 23:33 ` Kees Cook
2013-07-30 23:33 ` Kees Cook
2013-07-31 0:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-31 0:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-30 23:58 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-07-30 23:58 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-07-31 0:04 ` Dave Jones
2013-07-31 0:04 ` Dave Jones
2013-07-31 9:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-07-31 9:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-07-31 14:24 ` Dave Jones
2013-07-31 14:24 ` Dave Jones
2013-08-01 2:47 ` Olof Johansson
2013-08-01 2:47 ` Olof Johansson
2013-08-01 2:59 ` Dave Jones
2013-08-01 2:59 ` Dave Jones
2013-08-01 16:02 ` Vince Weaver
2013-08-01 16:02 ` Vince Weaver
2013-08-21 15:26 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-21 15:26 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-21 15:43 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2013-08-21 15:43 ` Dave Jones
2013-08-21 15:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-21 15:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-01 9:13 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-08-01 9:13 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-08-01 19:05 ` Dave Jones
2013-08-01 19:05 ` Dave Jones
2013-08-01 19:16 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-08-01 19:16 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-08-01 19:26 ` Julia Lawall
2013-08-01 19:26 ` Julia Lawall
2013-08-03 0:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-06 21:44 ` Kees Cook
2013-08-13 4:51 ` Laura Abbott
2013-08-13 4:51 ` Laura Abbott
2013-08-26 19:56 ` Mark Brown
2013-08-26 19:56 ` Mark Brown
2013-08-27 2:09 ` Laura Abbott
2013-08-27 2:09 ` Laura Abbott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130821154355.GA20784@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.