Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/hwpoison: fix return value of madvise_hwpoison

[Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

Hi Chen,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 03:37:01AM -0400, Chen Gong wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:38:27AM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> > Hi Naoya,
>> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:28:16PM -0400, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
>> > >On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:39:31AM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> > >> The return value outside for loop is always zero which means madvise_hwpoison 
>> > >> return success, however, this is not truth for soft_offline_page w/ failure
>> > >> return value.
>> > >
>> > >I don't understand what you want to do for what reason. Could you clarify
>> > >those?
>> > 
>> > int ret is defined in two place in madvise_hwpoison. One is out of for
>> > loop and its value is always zero(zero means success for madvise), the 
>> > other one is in for loop. The soft_offline_page function maybe return 
>> > -EBUSY and break, however, the ret out of for loop is return which means 
>> > madvise_hwpoison success. 
>> 
>> Oh, I see. Thanks.
>> 
>I don't think such change is a good idea. The original code is obviously
>easy to confuse people. Why not removing redundant local variable?
>

I think the trick here is get_user_pages_fast will return the number of
pages pinned. It is always 1 in madvise_hwpoison, the return value of 
memory_failure is ignored. Therefore we still need to reset ret to 0 
before return madvise_hwpoison. 

Regards,
Wanpeng Li 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>