All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com (Ezequiel Garcia)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/4] ARM: Add atomic_io_modify optimized routines
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 06:49:08 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130828094907.GB2343@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130828085340.GB58219@MacBook-Pro.local>

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 09:53:40AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 04:35:30PM +0100, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > Implement arch-specific atomic_io_modify and atomic_io_modify_relaxed,
> > which are based on writel/readl_relaxed and writel_relaxed/readl_relaxed,
> > respectively.
> > In both cases, by relaxing the readl, perfomance can be improved.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/include/asm/io.h |  4 ++++
> >  arch/arm/kernel/io.c      | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h
> > index d070741..53637b6 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h
> > @@ -397,5 +397,9 @@ extern int devmem_is_allowed(unsigned long pfn);
> >  extern void register_isa_ports(unsigned int mmio, unsigned int io,
> >  			       unsigned int io_shift);
> >  
> > +#define __HAVE_ARCH_ATOMIC_IO_MODIFY
> > +extern void atomic_io_modify(void __iomem *reg, u32 mask, u32 set);
> > +extern void atomic_io_modify_relaxed(void __iomem *reg, u32 mask, u32 set);
> > +
> >  #endif	/* __KERNEL__ */
> >  #endif	/* __ASM_ARM_IO_H */
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/io.c b/arch/arm/kernel/io.c
> > index dcd5b4d..a8c9c9b 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/io.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/io.c
> > @@ -1,6 +1,35 @@
> >  #include <linux/export.h>
> >  #include <linux/types.h>
> >  #include <linux/io.h>
> > +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> > +
> > +static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(__io_lock);
> > +
> > +void atomic_io_modify_relaxed(void __iomem *reg, u32 mask, u32 set)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> > +	u32 value;
> > +
> > +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&__io_lock, flags);
> > +	value = readl_relaxed(reg) & ~mask;
> > +	value |= (set & mask);
> > +	writel_relaxed(value, reg);
> > +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&__io_lock, flags);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(atomic_io_modify_relaxed);
> > +
> > +void atomic_io_modify(void __iomem *reg, u32 mask, u32 set)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> > +	u32 value;
> > +
> > +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&__io_lock, flags);
> > +	value = readl_relaxed(reg) & ~mask;
> > +	value |= (set & mask);
> > +	writel(value, reg);
> > +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&__io_lock, flags);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(atomic_io_modify);
> 
> Is this any different from the generic one introduced in patch 1/4? I
> would rather just use the generic definition.

Well, according to Will Deacon (and as documented in the commit log)
we can optimize in ARM by using readl_relaxed instead of readl.

Now, I'm sure you now better than me if that results (or not) in any
significant optimization.

> Similarly, a generic
> atomic_io_modify_relaxed() but guarded with something like
> __HAVE_ARCH_RELAXED_IO.
> 

No, that's not possible. As far as I understand, there's no guarantee
of _relaxed variants to be available architecture-wide.
-- 
Ezequiel Garc?a, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
	Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
	Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>,
	Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] ARM: Add atomic_io_modify optimized routines
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 06:49:08 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130828094907.GB2343@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130828085340.GB58219@MacBook-Pro.local>

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 09:53:40AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 04:35:30PM +0100, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > Implement arch-specific atomic_io_modify and atomic_io_modify_relaxed,
> > which are based on writel/readl_relaxed and writel_relaxed/readl_relaxed,
> > respectively.
> > In both cases, by relaxing the readl, perfomance can be improved.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/include/asm/io.h |  4 ++++
> >  arch/arm/kernel/io.c      | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h
> > index d070741..53637b6 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h
> > @@ -397,5 +397,9 @@ extern int devmem_is_allowed(unsigned long pfn);
> >  extern void register_isa_ports(unsigned int mmio, unsigned int io,
> >  			       unsigned int io_shift);
> >  
> > +#define __HAVE_ARCH_ATOMIC_IO_MODIFY
> > +extern void atomic_io_modify(void __iomem *reg, u32 mask, u32 set);
> > +extern void atomic_io_modify_relaxed(void __iomem *reg, u32 mask, u32 set);
> > +
> >  #endif	/* __KERNEL__ */
> >  #endif	/* __ASM_ARM_IO_H */
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/io.c b/arch/arm/kernel/io.c
> > index dcd5b4d..a8c9c9b 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/io.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/io.c
> > @@ -1,6 +1,35 @@
> >  #include <linux/export.h>
> >  #include <linux/types.h>
> >  #include <linux/io.h>
> > +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> > +
> > +static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(__io_lock);
> > +
> > +void atomic_io_modify_relaxed(void __iomem *reg, u32 mask, u32 set)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> > +	u32 value;
> > +
> > +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&__io_lock, flags);
> > +	value = readl_relaxed(reg) & ~mask;
> > +	value |= (set & mask);
> > +	writel_relaxed(value, reg);
> > +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&__io_lock, flags);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(atomic_io_modify_relaxed);
> > +
> > +void atomic_io_modify(void __iomem *reg, u32 mask, u32 set)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> > +	u32 value;
> > +
> > +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&__io_lock, flags);
> > +	value = readl_relaxed(reg) & ~mask;
> > +	value |= (set & mask);
> > +	writel(value, reg);
> > +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&__io_lock, flags);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(atomic_io_modify);
> 
> Is this any different from the generic one introduced in patch 1/4? I
> would rather just use the generic definition.

Well, according to Will Deacon (and as documented in the commit log)
we can optimize in ARM by using readl_relaxed instead of readl.

Now, I'm sure you now better than me if that results (or not) in any
significant optimization.

> Similarly, a generic
> atomic_io_modify_relaxed() but guarded with something like
> __HAVE_ARCH_RELAXED_IO.
> 

No, that's not possible. As far as I understand, there's no guarantee
of _relaxed variants to be available architecture-wide.
-- 
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-28  9:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-24 15:35 [PATCH v4 0/4] Introduce atomic MMIO modify Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-24 15:35 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-24 15:35 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] lib: " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-24 15:35   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-24 18:27   ` richard -rw- weinberger
2013-08-24 18:27     ` richard -rw- weinberger
2013-08-24 19:58     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-24 19:58       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-24 20:35       ` Richard Weinberger
2013-08-24 20:35         ` Richard Weinberger
2013-08-24 20:49         ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-24 20:49           ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-24 20:53           ` Richard Weinberger
2013-08-24 20:53             ` Richard Weinberger
2013-08-24 23:15       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-24 23:15         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-08-27 14:37   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-27 14:37     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-27 20:37   ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-27 20:37     ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-28 10:24     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-28 10:24       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-28 19:33       ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-28 19:33         ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-29  8:03         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-29  8:03           ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-28 10:37   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-28 10:37     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-28 16:16     ` Linus Torvalds
2013-08-28 16:16       ` Linus Torvalds
2013-08-24 15:35 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] ARM: Add atomic_io_modify optimized routines Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-24 15:35   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-28  8:53   ` Catalin Marinas
2013-08-28  8:53     ` Catalin Marinas
2013-08-28  9:49     ` Ezequiel Garcia [this message]
2013-08-28  9:49       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-28 10:01       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-28 10:01         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-28 11:39         ` Catalin Marinas
2013-08-28 11:39           ` Catalin Marinas
2013-08-24 15:35 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] clocksource: orion: Use atomic access for shared registers Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-24 15:35   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-24 15:35 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] watchdog: " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-08-24 15:35   ` Ezequiel Garcia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130828094907.GB2343@localhost \
    --to=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.